[hchutch]

You make some good points. However, I also see that it is a chance to fix a few things.

We've seen how Fox News Channel took off in a short period of time. The Left is upset about that. How do you think the playing field would change with a "Fox Evening News" airing opposite Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw?

[Chairman_December_19th_Society]

Let me get back to your #1238 in a moment. Something called "work" is getting in the way. :((

[Dane]

You make some good points. However, I also see that it is a chance to fix a few things.

My basic question earlier in this thread of if the California recall would have happened without the internet has gone unanswered.

Seems like some(not the people pinged) just like to use FR to rant, IMO.

[Chairman_December_19th_Society]

How do you think the playing field would change with a "Fox Evening News" airing opposite Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw?

Special Report with Bret Hume runs before, in a lot of markets, the three leftist wags. Indeed, most of the news in that show is piped out by 6:30; the remaining half hour tends to get into discussion. Then there's the Fox Report at 7:00 - also hard news. Alas, I'm not sure how that can, from a hard news standpoint, be buffed up more, but with the sheeple still getting their news (albiet among a declining share) from the three wags (for the most part), this makes the whole operation tough. I'm sure tonight's spin will be along the lines that this was a victory for those seeking to remove money from politics thereby increasing the voice of the little guy.

Never mind that it will do neither. It will simply make the money from the big boys move to areas that are harder to trace, IMO.