Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opposing slavery and Yankees in U.S. Civil War
The Toronto Star ^

Posted on 12/09/2003 1:33:48 PM PST by albertabound

Opposing slavery and Yankees in U.S. Civil War

As the U.S. Civil War shook North America in the 1860s, Canadian sympathies often lay with the slaveholding South. In his book Dixie & The Dominion, Toronto Star news editor Adam Mayers examines this paradox of public opinion in a country escaped slaves often called "The Promised Land."

When the news reached the Canadian parliament in July, 1861, that the Northern army had been routed at the Battle of Bull Run, the first major conflict of the American Civil War, a spontaneous cheer was raised in the House for the South.

In Canada, the place that escaped slaves called The Promised Land as they travelled to safety along the underground railroad, the colony's political leaders were rooting for the slave owners' cause.

As strange at it may seem, Canadians were able to separate slavery from the cause of the war, which was fought between 1861 and 1865. This apparent absurdity allowed public opinion to support the South, but oppose slavery, be anti-Yankee, but for closer trade ties with New England. It was the paradox of Canada's relationship with its neighbour in the middle years of the 19th century.

In 1861, Canadians had many things in common with the northern United States. There was language, religion and ethnic similarity. Canada's elite were descendants of United Empire Loyalists, the American colonists who had sided with Britain during the American Revolution.

Canadians and Americans lived along a long, artificial border. The frontier was easy to cross and many Canadians had friends and family living along the south side of the lower Great Lakes in upstate New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan. A free trade agreement in 1854 brought closer economic ties and helped Canada's smaller manufacturing industries find new markets.

Canada (then only Ontario and Quebec) could not help but be drawn into the ideological debate about slavery, the issue that dominated the political stage in the years leading up to the war. The practice had been banned in the colonies for almost three-quarters of a century and there was no public support for the institution. Canada was also proud of its role as the terminus of the Underground Railroad.

After 1850, when American law enforcement agencies were compelled by the Fugitive Slave Act to hunt fleeing slaves and return them to their owners, Canada became even more attractive to runaways. They were safe once they crossed the border and could not be extradited to the United States.

Harriet Beecher Stowe's classic Uncle Tom's Cabin caused a sensation when it was published in Toronto in 1852. The Globe newspaper printed excerpts from the book, helping it become a bestseller. The Globe was then a leading Liberal voice and its owner, George Brown, was a staunch abolitionist. Brown pounded away at the anti-slavery cause in the pages of his paper. He was so involved in the issue that when the Rev. John Brown held a secret meeting in Chatham in 1858 hoping to find recruits for a slave rebellion, George Brown was in the audience.

John Brown's raid a year later on a federal arsenal at Harper's Ferry in what is now West Virginia had many political ramifications as America slid toward war. Brown was captured and charged with treason. At his trial, the Chatham meeting was raised in evidence to support a claim in the Southern States that Canada was involved in a plot to undermine the South's way of life.

For many reasons, the anti-slavery sentiment did not translate into support for the North when the Southern States seceded in April, 1861.

The explanation lay in distrust and suspicion of northern motives in waging the war. Britain and Canada had viewed the dramatic growth of the United States during the first half of the century with alarm. The Americans bought Louisiana from France and Florida from Spain. They picked a fight with Mexico and ended up with Texas and California. Through a deal with Britain, Oregon and the Pacific Northwest were added to the U.S. sphere.

Seen through that lens, the war was about the North trying to impose its expansionist will on the South. The South, on the other hand, was trying to preserve its identity against overwhelming Yankee pressure.

The issue became more confusing when President Abraham Lincoln said in his first inaugural address he did not regard himself primarily as the emancipator of slaves, but the protector of the Union.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it'

Abraham Lincoln

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"My paramount objective in this struggle is to save the Union and is not either to save or destroy slavery," Lincoln said. "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could do it by freeing some of the slaves and leaving others alone, I would do that."

So, if the war wasn't about slavery, what was it about? To many Canadians it seemed to be more of the American Revolution. The Canadian elite, like the British upper-class, saw Southerners as having the same right to leave the Union as the original Thirteen Colonies had to break away from the British Empire.

English novelist and social commentator Anthony Trollope visited Canada during the middle of the war and was puzzled by the strong public opinion favouring the South.

"Their sympathies are with the Southern States not because they (favour slavery)," he wrote in North America. "They sympathize with the South from a strong dislike to the aggression, the braggadocio and the insolence they have felt upon their own borders."

Britain sensed a strategic advantage for her five North American colonies in a divided Union. Canada might emerge as a dominant player if the Union dissolved into two smaller powers. Col. Garnet Wolseley was quick to see that during a tour of Canada as part of a general reinforcement of its defences.

Wolseley later became commander-in-chief of the British army. In 1862, he spent a month visiting the Confederacy. He argued in a letter to his superiors that Britain should grant the Confederate States diplomatic status because the division of the republic into two weak countries would strengthen Britain's North American hand.

Wolseley later told a friend that his good wishes for the South stemmed from "my dislike of the people of the United States and my delight at seeing their swagger and bunkum rudely kicked out of them."

The pro-Southern feeling lasted well after the war. On May 30, 1867, Jefferson Davis, ex-president of the Confederate States, came to Toronto immediately after his release from prison. More than 1,000 people greeted him at the wharf at the foot of Yonge St.

As Davis moved down the gangway, a cheer went up from the crowd. The Hamilton Spectator reported the next day that Davis appeared deeply moved. He bowed and said repeatedly: "Thank you, thank you, you are very kind to me."

Davis had been arrested in April, 1865, when the Confederacy collapsed, ending four years of war. When he was in Toronto, he met with other Southerners who lived in exile in Niagara-on-the-Lake. Davis later told Gen. Robert E. Lee about the humiliation of being "hooted at and jeered" at train stations throughout the Northern States, yet being so thoroughly welcomed in Canada.

The New York Times was indignant that a "war criminal" should be received so well in Canada.

The New York Tribune said the fuss made over Davis "proves that the Canadians are in a very bad condition of mind. They won't recover their equanimity until they are annexed."

On July 1, 1867, a month after Davis arrived in Toronto, Canadians were celebrating Confederation. Since then, Canadians and Americans have enjoyed one of the greatest friendships in the world, a legacy of peaceful co-existence that despite current tensions remains unrivalled among the nations of the world.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TOPICS: Canada
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; dixielist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: stainlessbanner
Like the Emancipation Proclamation, certainly, although I think Fort Sumter is a somewhat more debatable ;)
41 posted on 12/10/2003 6:31:32 AM PST by general_re (Knife goes in, guts come out! That's what Osaka Food Concern is all about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: albertabound
The Canadian's of the past were insightful.

Score one in the win column for Canada.

42 posted on 12/10/2003 6:36:58 AM PST by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
since the lincoln regime openly said that he/they had NO INTEREST in freeing the slaves, one is left with only one main reason for TWBTS = a sincere desire on the part of southrons to be FREE of damnyankee meddling ibn our internal affairs.

free dixie,sw

43 posted on 12/10/2003 8:03:35 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fiscally_right
NOPE! slaves were NOT soldiers, sailors or marines, as slaves were not free to take the oath of enlistment. nonetheless, SOME slaves did take up arms for the south, mostly when they ended up in the midst of battle with their units.

the 100,000+ black CSA soldiers, sailors & marines were FREE men.

that's the "dirty little secret" that the damnyankee apologists don't want you to know.

see BLACKS IN BLUE & GRAY, by Professor H R Blackerby, late of the Tuskeegee University history faculty for more info.

free dixie,sw

44 posted on 12/10/2003 8:11:13 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Capriole
YEP. you got it!

free dixie,sw

45 posted on 12/10/2003 8:12:50 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Even the one's who still root for the Yankees? (like me)
46 posted on 12/10/2003 8:15:15 AM PST by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
The first American urban legend and revisionist history - the CW was fought over slavery.

"What was the reason that induced Georgia to take the step of secession? This reason may be summed up in one single proposition. It was a conviction, a deep conviction on the part of Georgia, that a separation from the North-was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery." -- Speech of Henry Benning to the Virginia Secession Convention

But what did he know, right?

47 posted on 12/10/2003 8:15:26 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: x
the Lousiana Native Guard "volunteered for union service" AFTER the unit's free members were notified that they would be sold as slaves if they didn't "volunteer".

did you not know that OR are you hoping nobody else here did????

free dixie,sw

48 posted on 12/10/2003 8:15:32 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
TRUE!

free dixie,sw

49 posted on 12/10/2003 8:17:22 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
to the slaveowners, the preservation of their slaves WAS important. BUT for the 94-95% of southerners who owned NO slaves, the war was about just ONE thing: DIXIE FREEDOM.

free dixie,sw

50 posted on 12/10/2003 8:19:46 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: stand watie; x
did you not know that OR are you hoping nobody else here did????

Ludicrous claims notwithstanding, the fact still remains that the black soldiers organized and volunteered to fight for the confederacy and were refused becuase they were black. Now according to your post 44 it seems that every single free black male of military age served 4 or 5 times, since that's the only way 100,000 free blacks could have served. They must have made up for the Louisiana Guard, right?

51 posted on 12/10/2003 8:21:57 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
the war was about just ONE thing: DIXIE FREEDOM.

For the 65% or so of the non-slave population, of course.

52 posted on 12/10/2003 8:23:12 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
go argue with Dr Blackerby. he's the one who came up with the numbers, based on the actual service records of the soldiers, sailors & marines.

i KNOW you don't want to accept his figures though, as it makes YOUR position look STUPID & HYPOCRYTICAL!

you'll have to yell really loud at him though, as he's deceased. on the other hand, shouting at him would make just as much sense as the lies, evasions, deceptions & nonsensical PROPAGANDA that you post in support of the damnyankee cause.

free dixie,sw

53 posted on 12/10/2003 8:28:59 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
This is not so absurd. By the time of the Civil War, slavery was beginning to lose support in the south just as it had lost support in the north a few decades earlier.

You have obviously never read the "Cornerstone Speech"

54 posted on 12/10/2003 8:32:22 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
almost nobody in 1861, either north or south, cared what slaves thought or didn't think, including your clayfooted saint, abe the first of damnyankeeland.

the inconvienient truth for damnyankee revisionists was/IS that blacks, reds, browns & asians in the southland were on the whole just as pro-dixie independence as the white population was.

free dixie,sw

55 posted on 12/10/2003 8:33:47 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
THE ARTICLES OF SECESSION

We the people of the State of Georgia in Convention assembled do declare and ordain and it is hereby declared and ordained that the ordinance adopted by the State of Georgia in convention on the 2nd day of Jany. in the year of our Lord seventeen hundred and eighty-eight, whereby the constitution of the United States of America was assented to, ratified and adopted, and also all acts and parts of acts of the general assembly of this State, ratifying and adopting amendments to said constitution, are hereby repealed, rescinded and abrogated.

We do further declare and ordain that the union now existing between the State of Georgia and other States under the name of the United States of America is hereby dissolved, and that the State of Georgia is in full possession and exercise of all those rights of sovereignty which belong and appertain to a free and independent State.
DON'T SEE A WORD ABOUT SLAVERY



56 posted on 12/10/2003 8:37:22 AM PST by righthand man (WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: righthand man
IF you were a slaveowner in 1861 and only about 5-6% of southerners were, then the preservation of slavery was really important to you.

otoh, for the rest of southerners, the WBTS was just about one MAIN cause= dixie FREEDOM!

that is STILL true.

free dixie,sw

57 posted on 12/10/2003 8:42:48 AM PST by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. ,T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: righthand man
DON'T SEE A WORD ABOUT SLAVERY

Georgia Declaration of Causes of Secession - you may find it mentioned once or twice in there. Or one or two dozen times....

58 posted on 12/10/2003 8:53:13 AM PST by general_re (Knife goes in, guts come out! That's what Osaka Food Concern is all about!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: general_re
THIS IS MY LINK
http://members.tripod.com/~CSApartisan/index.html
59 posted on 12/10/2003 8:58:59 AM PST by righthand man (WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: general_re
LOOKS LIKE AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY The Federalist Society
60 posted on 12/10/2003 9:06:26 AM PST by righthand man (WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson