[John O]

Were anyone to exclude a practicing homosexual from entering into contracts on that basis, they would rightly be thrown into prison.

Another case of bad law. If the laws were written correctly, to reflect our founding fathers ideals and the truth that 'homosexuality' is a symptom of an underlying mental trauma then these people would be in therapy instead of in our faces

[NutCrackerBoy]

If the laws were written correctly, to reflect our founding fathers ideals and the truth that 'homosexuality' is a symptom of an underlying mental trauma then these people would be in therapy instead of in our faces.

I advocate a third way: pursue their happiness in relative private.

In most instances in our faces is uncalled for. Gay "marriage" is one of those. But we as individuals should be tolerant, certainly absolutely so about responsible private homosexual behavior.

Based on these stances, I think I can remain sort of neutral on what you say about therapy. I believe it to be irrelevant to the issues on these threads.

[ArGee]

If the laws were written correctly, to reflect our founding fathers ideals and the truth that 'homosexuality' is a symptom of an underlying mental trauma then these people would be in therapy instead of in our faces.

Not so fast, John. SCOTUS made it a violation of human rights to force someone into therapy. That's why there are so many mentally ill walking the streets.

I mean besides the homosexuals.

But otherwise you are right on.

If we could give homosexuals a pill which would change nothing else about them except their "sexual orientation," does anyone argue they would be better off to take the pill?

Shalom.