[NutCrackerBoy]

If the laws were written correctly, to reflect our founding fathers ideals and the truth that 'homosexuality' is a symptom of an underlying mental trauma then these people would be in therapy instead of in our faces.

I advocate a third way: pursue their happiness in relative private.

In most instances in our faces is uncalled for. Gay "marriage" is one of those. But we as individuals should be tolerant, certainly absolutely so about responsible private homosexual behavior.

Based on these stances, I think I can remain sort of neutral on what you say about therapy. I believe it to be irrelevant to the issues on these threads.

[ArGee]

I advocate a third way: pursue their happiness in relative private.

If they were happy that way, we wouldn't have so many threads about them on FR.

They won't allow that way.

Shalom.

[John O]

In most instances in our faces is uncalled for. Gay "marriage" is one of those. But we as individuals should be tolerant, certainly absolutely so about responsible private homosexual behavior.

If they had kept their disease and behavior private and did not seek to recruit then I'd have no problem with them living as they wish. The problem is that they are a hazard not only to themselves (see Scripters disease data) but to society as a whole (see the molestation,crime,drugs etc data) and they refuse to keep their perverse behavior private.

Of course the humane thing is to get them cured but if they won't seek the cure then they will bear the responsibility for it. Can't force someone to get better, you can only quarantine them away from the healthy population