Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2003 11:42:35 AM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Phil V.
One world body has to consult with another, before issuing their opinion?

Oh, I see, this is how Breyer, O'Connor, and Bader-Ginsburg see things, too.
2 posted on 12/08/2003 11:44:44 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Gee I wonder how they will rule? /scarcasm.
3 posted on 12/08/2003 11:48:40 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

UN votes 90:8 to send fence to Hague



The United Nations General Assembly voted Monday to request that the International Court of Justice deliberate on whether Israel is legally obligated to halt construction of the security fence.

Ninety voted for the motion, eight against, including the United States, Israel, Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, Uganda and the Pacific islands Naui and Palau. Seventy-four abstained, including the members of the European Union.

EU Ambassador to Israel Giancarlo Chevallard defended the abstentions, saying that European states could not vote against the proposal in order to maintain open channels with those states that support the idea, and that the European vote would regardless be unlikely to affect the inevitable outcome.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said that Israel will, should the need arise, present its case before the IJC and argue that the fence is a legal barrier designed to protect lives.

This is "the fence that Arafat built," UN ambassador Dan Gillerman said Monday. "Arafat built the fence, and his terror initiated it and made the fence inevitable. If there were no Arafat, there would be no need for a fence," he said.

He also attacked the world body itself, saying, "We don't think that it is up to the United Nations or any other international body to determine the legal aspect of this measure," adding that none of Israel's neighbors "have an independent legal system comparable to ours."

The IJC's opinion would not be binding, said Ruth Lapidoth, a professor of international law at Hebrew University. "It is an advisory opinion," she said. "It is only a question of public relations." Such cases usually take between 4 and 15 months, she said.

The Palestinian UN observer, Nasser Al-Kidwa, started pushing for the resolution after Secretary-General Kofi Annan issued a November 28 report declaring that Israel had failed to comply with a General Assembly demand to halt construction of the fence, which juts into the West Bank.

Earlier Monday, Shinui called for a vote to change the security fence's route. If the fence were closer to the Green Line, the party argued, it would be "more of a security fence and less of a political fence."



4 posted on 12/08/2003 11:49:55 AM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Why not just let the Muslim middle east world vote on whether or not Israel has the right to defend herself against internal terrorists...

Wait till the UN decides that America must "give back" the southwest territories it stole from Mexico....and Russia....and France...and the Indians....and gives reparations to former so called slave descendants...etc etc etc...

Of course the UN can also then prosecute any former GIs for War crimes in Vietnam and Korea..
it feels obliged to as well....
5 posted on 12/08/2003 11:50:15 AM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
I say go with concrete, stone, or brick instead of wood. Longer lasting and less maintenance. Also my opinion is that topping it with a nice row of barbed wire, while not aesthetically exciting, is most effective and preferable.

Maybe the Hague can recommend what color to paint the wall...
6 posted on 12/08/2003 11:50:35 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat (www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
This paragraph summed it up nicely:

"This is the fence that Arafat built," said Gillerman. "His terrorism initiated it and made its construction inevitable. If there were no Arafat, there would be no need for a fence."
7 posted on 12/08/2003 11:54:07 AM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
74 of 172 abstain? That's interesting.
8 posted on 12/08/2003 11:59:29 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Predicted court opinion: the fence is a bad thing, because it prevents Palestinians from exercising their legal right to kill Jews.
10 posted on 12/08/2003 12:02:02 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Israel should use this latest outrage as justification to withdraw from the UN. There's no way it could make things any worse for Israel, and any future anti-Israeli resolutions will look like sour grapes on the UN's part.
12 posted on 12/08/2003 12:05:07 PM PST by aynrandfreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Perhaps they can also inquire about "no man's land" in Korea, or the ex-Berlin Wall, or the fences between the US and Mexico.....

Those will truly be timely decisions
14 posted on 12/08/2003 12:23:38 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
The UN should use a ranking system similar to the BCS method used for college football. As such, the USA should have exponentially higher weight placed on its vote and therefore trump the majority of votes from the 90 idiot countries that opted for the resolution. Size does matter.
15 posted on 12/08/2003 12:28:09 PM PST by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
"Opinion won't be legally binding"

Nor will it be enforceable.

We already know the world's opinion espcially Europes opinion on Jews.

17 posted on 12/08/2003 12:40:09 PM PST by Kay Soze (How does the "W" fit in at a gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.; SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Thinkin' Gal; Bobby777; adam_az; Alouette; ...
Will no one allow Israel to defend itself?

Israeli UN ambassador Dan Gillerman, speaking to the UN on Mon. ahead of a vote asking the int'l court to rule on the West Bank fence. (S. Azran)

18 posted on 12/08/2003 12:55:14 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
The United Nations General Assembly approved on Monday a Palestinian-initiated resolution asking the International Court of Justice to issue an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's construction of the separation fence. Ninety nations voted in favor of the draft, eight opposed and 74 countries abstained.

WTH??

Will some one .. any one tell WHY the UN is still around??

19 posted on 12/08/2003 12:56:01 PM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
We really should quit the UN. And kick them out of NY.
23 posted on 12/08/2003 1:07:05 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Still Life:

Puppet with muppet

25 posted on 12/08/2003 1:13:04 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
"This is an attempt... to delegitimize the right of the Jewish people to have a Jewish state that they can defend."

Israel should have never signed the Clinton contract to give up land for peace. Once Clinton got Israel to validate a Palistinian state through the Oslo Accords, it was all over for Israels future. They made a pact with the Devil.

26 posted on 12/08/2003 1:16:13 PM PST by concerned about politics ( "Satire". It's Just "Satire.".......So it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
"This is the fence that Arafat built"


30 posted on 12/08/2003 1:52:46 PM PST by lonevoice (Legal disclaimer: The above is MY OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
Israel has little experience with the ICJ. It approached the court in 1957 to pursue a claim against Bulgaria, after an El Al plane was shot down over the Eastern bloc country two years earlier. But the case was dismissed because Bulgaria was not willing to accept the court's authority. No brainer. Israel need not play this game.
31 posted on 12/08/2003 2:00:33 PM PST by RobbyS (XP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Phil V.
I hope they vote it is bad so that Israel can give the Hague the middle finger, and prove the internationalist' irrelevance
32 posted on 12/08/2003 2:02:01 PM PST by Porterville (No communist or french)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson