Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush raising Jewish funds from Republicans and Democrats
Chicago Jewish News ^ | 12/8/2003 | Matthew E. Berger

Posted on 12/08/2003 11:06:41 AM PST by Inyokern

Jewish money: Bush raising Jewish funds from Republicans and Democrats
By Matthew E. Berger

When Fred Zeidman raised money in the Jewish community for George W. Bush's presidential run in 2000, several Jewish supporters asked to give their donations in cash, afraid of having a public record of their transaction.

But this time around, Zeidman is not encountering timid Jews. He said many Jewish donors are eager to leap onto the Bush-Cheney bandwagon.

"The difference is night and day," said Zeidman, whom Bush appointed as chairman of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council in 2002. "You can't believe how easy it is."

Zeidman, a Houston resident who bills himself as a coordinator of Bush support in the Jewish community, said he and other Jewish fund-raisers for Bush say they have had little trouble raising the $200,000 needed to join the "Rangers club"-the top ranking of Bush's financial backers.

While all accounts seem to suggest that Bush is getting unprecedented financial support in the Jewish community, it is still unclear whether that financial support will translate into votes come November 2004.

Jews traditionally have voted largely for Democratic candidates in national elections, but Republicans are hoping that support for Bush's foreign policy will mean a much stronger showing than the 19 percent he garnered in 2000.

In the fund raising realm, several big Republican donors, who contributed millions of dollars in "soft money" before new campaign finance laws were put into effect, also were leaders of the organized Jewish community.

This time around, Bush is raising funds outside the normal Republican Jewish circle, finding a new crop of donors willing to contribute to a candidate they see as fervently pro- Israel.

"I think that Israel, the war on terrorism and homeland defense are all coming together right now," said Matthew Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition. He said Jewish donors "see leadership from this president in waging the war on terrorism as a critical thing."

Already, the RJC says, Jewish donors are poised to give more to Bush coffers than three years ago. Brooks estimated that RJC leadership contributed or raised more than $7 million in 2000, and he expects that number to increase significantly this time around.

While much of that money is coming from Jews who backed Bush in 2000, some of the money is from Democratic converts and new donors.

The Bush fund-raising machine is riding a wave of support within segments of the American Jewish community for Bush's policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Supporters point to his decision to disassociate from Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat as a defining moment for U.S. policy in the Middle East.

At a time of intense conflict in the region, some observers believe that foreign policy will play a greater role in picking a president.

While American Jews predominantly vote based on domestic issues and largely have a predisposition to vote Democratic, Middle East policy could be a larger factor than normal in 2004, said Ken Goldstein, a professor of political science and Jewish studies at the University of Wisconsin.

"We are at a time when there is a lot of uncertainty in the Middle East," he said. "American Jews are feeling under attack because of Israel as well."

He compared current times to 1980, when some Jewish support went to President Reagan because of concern about President Carter and the Iran hostage crisis.

"Everything we are doing is to give evidence to the president that the Jewish community is supportive of his policies on Israel," Zeidman said.

Ever since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks transformed Bush into a wartime president-and coincided with an intensification of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict -- Republicans have been stressing what they say is a growing trend of support for Bush in the American Jewish community.

It's a perception that Jewish Democrats combat fiercely.

Exit polls from the 2002 congressional elections showed that 35 percent of American Jews voted Republican, an increase from the 19 percent Bush received in 2000. But Democrats contest the exit polls-which were delayed almost a year because of data problems-and also suggested that they might not accurately predict support for Bush in 2004.

But while it is nearly impossible to tell whether there is indeed a new trend in Jewish politics, it is hard to ignore the anecdotal evidence that shows at least some big Jewish Democrats writing checks for Bush.

Jack Rosen, president of American Jewish Congress, has been backing Democratic presidential contenders for more than 20 years, but he said he recently cut a check for the president.

"I think basically what I am saying is we need to recognize what this president has done for Israel," Rosen said.

He said that some of the Democratic candidates for president have been good on Israel-including some with long track records of support for the Jewish state-but it is impossible to be sure they will always side with the Jewish state when things get difficult.

Bush, he said, has proven himself.

"Until these candidates come out with a clear policy on the Israeli- Palestinian situation and Yasser Arafat, I've got to look at the president, who has set out a policy and been firm on that policy," Rosen said.

While Democratic Jews have been trying to show that all of the would-be nominees are strong on the Middle East, they may be hurt by recent remarks by Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.

The former Vermont governor recently suggested that the United States should have a more even-handed policy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, raising the ire of some American Jews. Dean has since clarified his remarks and met with representatives of the Jewish community.

"The only possible way for Bush to make really significant gains in the Jewish community in 2004 is for the Democratic nominees to be perceived, rightfully or not rightfully, as anti- Israel," said Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council. "And that is a phenomenon that will not happen."

Forman is skeptical of the recent polling numbers touted by the RJC and said that support for Bush from the Jewish community is coming mostly from the organizational leadership, not voters.

"In the central core of some of these organizations in the Jewish community there is a pro-Bush chorus," Forman said. "But if you look at the general electorate, it isn't happening."

Zeidman said that while Republicans are at an advantage right now, a Democratic nominee with a pro-Israel platform could balance Bush's support in the Jewish community.

If that happens, Jews may look at social policy to break the tie, and that may bring more liberal, pro- Israel Jewish voters back into the embrace of the Democratic Party.

"A year from now, people are going to be focused on social issues," he said. "That's going to have a major influence on how people vote, and the campaign is well aware of that."

That's one of the reasons Zeidman and others are doing so much fund raising now. But he is confident that Bush's support will not dissipate.

"People vote for or against an incumbent, not the people running against them," he said. "It's about support for the president or dissatisfaction with him."

It doesn't hurt that Bush has been heavily courting the Jewish community.

Aside from his Middle East policy, Bush has held numerous events geared toward a Jewish audience. He met during the High Holidays with a group of rabbis, and he welcomed the opening of an Anne Frank exhibit at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum with a reception for a wide spectrum of Jewish figures from across the country.

Bush and his advisers have reached out in subtler ways as well, including asking rabbis to give invocations at fund raisers.

Zeidman contends these actions are not direct pleas for votes, just acknowledgments of a continued relationship between the Republican administration and like-minded Jews.

"They have never courted the Jewish vote," he said. "They understand too well the social issues and have no expectation of the Jewish vote."

Goldstein says the Bush administration's aim should not be to court the Jewish vote en masse, but to appeal to just enough Jewish voters to help sway key states, such as Florida and Pennsylvania.

"If he can get 30 percent of the Jewish vote and maintain Jewish financial support in key states, that can be crucial," said Goldstein. "You don't need 100 percent."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinace; electionpresident; fundraising; jewish; republicans
If the head of the American Jewish Congress is supporting Bush, this is huge
1 posted on 12/08/2003 11:06:44 AM PST by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
Huge is right. Whoopee!
2 posted on 12/08/2003 11:10:21 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
During one of the last debates, every Dem candidate punted when asked about their stand on Israel. In some cases, I think it may have been Brian Williams, the candidates were asked twice, still no answer.

Watching a Dem debate is particularly funny, and frustrating at the same time. Candidates literally ignore questions and either completely change the subject or provide some sort of Clintonian spin and twist answer. And there is only one Clinton, and the nine dwarves ain't no Clinton.
3 posted on 12/08/2003 11:15:55 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
I agree. Also, if the cited exit poll data and the anecdotal fundraising information are both true, this is a very important report. It would mean that (i) a significant number of American Jews have finally recognized that a McGovernite foreign policy and a Mondalian tax policy are not in their interest and (ii) they are willing to state this realization publicly. Very good news indeed.
4 posted on 12/08/2003 11:16:58 AM PST by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
After listening to the barrage of anti-Semitism arising from the far-left, is it any wonder why Bush is getting more support. Especially when you see some of these more extreme Democratic presidential candidates actually appearing at rallies where some in the audience aren't just pro-Palstinian...they're vehimently, anti-Israel. The Democrats are also making a big mistake everytime they or their constituents compare Bush with Hitler and Fascism: While the rhetoric may fire their side up, such comparisons do great damage and minimize the suffering of Jews that experienced that brutallity first-hand. It's an insult.
5 posted on 12/08/2003 11:23:23 AM PST by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cwboelter
The Democrats are also making a big mistake everytime they or their constituents compare Bush with Hitler and Fascism: While the rhetoric may fire their side up, such comparisons do great damage and minimize the suffering of Jews that experienced that brutallity first-hand. It's an insult.

Really excellent point. The Democrats don't know what they are doing with such hyped stereotypes. They did it with the confederate flag and guns, stereotyping those here in the south. Senator Teddy Kennedy calling latino and black judges, Neanderthals and the staffers leaks that they blocked judged because they were "Latino" is enough to scream racism to me.

I pray that the Dems continue their stereotyping and that it gets louder and louder till all the nation listens and the press perpetuates it and amplifies it until the Nation is sick of it and says 'Enough' at the polls and with the remote control.

6 posted on 12/08/2003 11:42:30 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
In a world where the three ideologies competing for world domination are Islam, European secular socialism and American Judeo-Christian capitalism, which system better serves us all, no less Jews?
7 posted on 12/08/2003 12:10:56 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
"Paging Abraham Foxman, paging Abraham Foxman... Mr. Foxman, the bus to the rest home is waiting for you outside..."
8 posted on 12/08/2003 12:32:24 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
I've been trying to explain to people around here for a while now, that there is a sea change underway with regards to Jewish political affiliation in the US. The elder generation, for whom socialism was anti-Nazism, is dying out. In their place are a lot of Jews for whom the US' Israel policy is the best indicator of who to vote for in order to avoid another Holocaust here.
9 posted on 12/08/2003 12:46:26 PM PST by thoughtomator (The U.N. is a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
He said that some of the Democratic candidates for president have been good on Israel-including some with long track records of support for the Jewish state-but it is impossible to be sure they will always side with the Jewish state when things get difficult.

Major concession, that. A couple more blunders by Dean could seal the deal, hopefully.

10 posted on 12/08/2003 12:50:14 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
"In the central core of some of these organizations in the Jewish community there is a pro-Bush chorus," Forman said. "But if you look at the general electorate, it isn't happening."

I know 2 Jewish Liberal professors at one of the most liberal universities. For the first time in their life, they admitted last week, that they are questioning their own liberal stance and taking a good look at what they called brain dead Republicans 3 years ago.

To watch any of the democrat debates and come away thinking that democrats are and will remain pro-Israel, would take some very stupid people, and that is something that the Jewish population is not.

11 posted on 12/08/2003 1:00:33 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
I am concerned that many of those same voters will not remember this come election day...but it is definitely an issue.
12 posted on 12/08/2003 1:11:52 PM PST by Abram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern
Sadaam will not be launching any more Scuds bump.
13 posted on 12/08/2003 1:30:46 PM PST by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson