[RGSpincich]

Taping by Amber is legal. NOW, will you guys belive me. LOL.

Have a Merry Christmas, all. I may be deeply involved in other matters until then but I'll be back. That darn paying job getting in the way of my FReeping again. ;~)

[drjulie]

"No kidding. Jury selection will be extremely tedious and thorough I believe. Out of likely hundreds of prospects, they will choose 12 PLUS the alternates. I too, think it will be a nightmare for both sides."

I pulled this over from the last thread. Won't they have to select a death penalty qualified jury? I hadn't really though about that - but that would be a huge advantage to the prosecution.

[runningbear]

have a great x-mas RG...

Me, in about 2 weeks,,,,, I'm blessed .... lol....

[Jackie-O]

Thanks for the ping rb!
RG, thanks for the info...I didn't thing they were going to find Amber's taping illegal...MG wasn't crying foul too loudly... ;o)

[Velveeta]

Never doubted you, RG.

Merry Christmas to you as well! Looking forward to your return, you'll be missed.

[Spunky]

"Taping by Amber is legal. NOW, will you guys belive me. LOL.

I believed you. I remember posting the California code and wondering if she fit into the special category.

I still wonder if she does on those calls she taped before the detective got involved.

From Article:
Recording calls is against the law in California -- unless the one taping gets the other person's consent. Another law permits covert recording to gather evidence of certain crimes, including murder.

That's how Frey did it. In fact, she had help from detectives who bought her a recording device and showed her how to use it -- hoping she could extract evidence from her boyfriend...............

Questioning from a defense attorney suggested that Frey had begun taping their calls on her own as of Dec. 16.