Skip to comments.
Revealed: the Iraqi colonel who told MI6 that Saddam could launch WMD within 45 minutes
Telegraph ^
| 12/6/03
| Con Coughlin
Posted on 12/06/2003 5:37:33 PM PST by Mark Felton
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
This has more info than previously posted article on same subject.
This is big news.
To: Mark Felton
It would sure shut the Libs up if we could find a couple cases of these buried somewhere.
2
posted on
12/06/2003 5:44:36 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
To: Mark Felton
What kind of WMD's could be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades? Sounds like chemical weapons to me.
3
posted on
12/06/2003 5:46:54 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Mark Felton
Thanks
4
posted on
12/06/2003 5:47:06 PM PST
by
Gothmog
To: Mark Felton
Bravo!
5
posted on
12/06/2003 5:51:43 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
(CBS [SeeBS] Deserves a Long Double Flush . . . Pull the Chain!)
To: Mark Felton
Is this guy in our custody? Seems like a valuable source.
6
posted on
12/06/2003 5:52:15 PM PST
by
Normal4me
To: Mark Felton
This IS indeed big news !! Thanks for the post!
7
posted on
12/06/2003 5:53:34 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: Mark Felton
and what are the chances we will see these on the Front Page of the Gray Lady tomorrow ????
ZERO
8
posted on
12/06/2003 5:57:00 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: Mark Felton
I am sure Steponallofus will be reporting on this tomorrow, unless it's not in the DNC talking points??? This story makes sense.
Pray for W ant the Truth
9
posted on
12/06/2003 5:57:24 PM PST
by
bray
(The Wicked Witch of NY is Melting!)
To: Mark Felton
Hmmmmmmmmmmm -- do you think the leftist media, e.g., the NYTimes, WashPost, CBSNBCABCMSNBCCNBCCNN, will bother to report this?!
10
posted on
12/06/2003 5:58:22 PM PST
by
DrDeb
To: Mark Felton
Shall we start a pool as to when the media will announce this news on the front pages?
I'll start....I'm picking NEVER.
Leni
11
posted on
12/06/2003 5:58:22 PM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Florida Freepers! Go to Fla. chapter forum for important announcements on chapter re-organization!)
To: fhayek
Your #3:
What kind of WMD's could be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades? Sounds like chemical weapons to me. Small, easy to conceal, lots of them still out there, and the bad guys know where they are.
12
posted on
12/06/2003 5:59:23 PM PST
by
White Mountain
(By their fruits ye shall know them.)
To: fhayek
"the secret weapon", were made in Iraq and designed to be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades. Probably Bio.
The amount of Chem you could put on the front of an RPG would not do much damage to NBC prepared troops, especially in vehicles designed to operate in that enviornment, such as tanks, etc.
Bio, on the other hand.... oh boy.
Suggest reading "The Cobra Event" by Richard Preston, who also wrote "Hot Zone." Cobra Event is not science fiction, it's "science fact."
Cobra Event was required reading in newsrooms all across country right after 9/11.
13
posted on
12/06/2003 6:01:56 PM PST
by
MindBender26
(For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper Network station)
To: Mark Felton
The only reason that these weapons were not used, said Col al-Dabbagh, was because the bulk of the Iraqi army did not want to fight for Saddam. "The West should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight," he said. "If the army had fought for Saddam Hussein and used these weapons there would have been terrible consequences." Col al-Dabbagh, who was recalled to Baghdad to work at Iraq's air defence headquarters during the war itself, believes that the WMD have been hidden at secret locations by the Fedayeen and are still in Iraq. "Only when Saddam is caught will people talk about these weapons," he said. ABC,NBC,CBS....
Anybody?
14
posted on
12/06/2003 6:03:50 PM PST
by
Indie
(We were warned. My people perish for lack of knowledge.)
To: Temple Owl
ping
15
posted on
12/06/2003 6:06:39 PM PST
by
Tribune7
(It's not like he let his secretary drown in his car or something.)
To: fhayek
Could be chemical or biological.
16
posted on
12/06/2003 6:06:41 PM PST
by
Endeavor
To: Mark Felton
BTTT
17
posted on
12/06/2003 6:08:05 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: MindBender26
One problem with bio weapons, they take time to affect the person being infected with them. On the other hand, Sarin (nerve agent) would be a quick killer of unprotected troops.
18
posted on
12/06/2003 6:24:08 PM PST
by
GreyFriar
(3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
To: DrDeb
Saw it covered on NBC nightly news.
To: Endeavor
Assuming this story is true, I would bet on chemical weapons. Biological weapons, as I understand it, require extensive production facilities (to prevent killing all of your production workers, as well as the surrounding population). Such facilities (on the outskirts of Baghdad)would be kind of hard to hide.
20
posted on
12/06/2003 6:53:44 PM PST
by
fhayek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson