Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: the Iraqi colonel who told MI6 that Saddam could launch WMD within 45 minutes
Telegraph ^ | 12/6/03 | Con Coughlin

Posted on 12/06/2003 5:37:33 PM PST by Mark Felton

An Iraqi colonel who commanded a front-line unit during the build-up to the war in Iraq has revealed how he passed top secret information to British intelligence warning that Saddam Hussein had deployed weapons of mass destruction that could be used on the battlefield against coalition troops in less than 45 minutes.

Lt-Col al-Dabbagh, 40, who was the head of an Iraqi air defence unit in the western desert, said that cases containing WMD warheads were delivered to front-line units, including his own, towards the end of last year.

He said they were to be used by Saddam's Fedayeen paramilitaries and units of the Special Republican Guard when the war with coalition troops reached "a critical stage".

The containers, which came from a number of factories on the outskirts of Baghdad, were delivered to the army by the Fedayeen and were distributed to the front-line units under cover of darkness.

In an exclusive interview with the Telegraph, Col al-Dabbagh said that he believed he was the source of the British Government's controversial claim, published in September last year in the intelligence dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, that Saddam could launch WMD within 45 minutes.

"I am the one responsible for providing this information," said the colonel, who is now working as an adviser to Iraq's Governing Council.

He also insisted that the information contained in the dossier relating to Saddam's battlefield WMD capability was correct. "It is 100 per cent accurate," he said after reading the relevant passage.

The devices, which were known by Iraqi officers as "the secret weapon", were made in Iraq and designed to be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades. They could also have been launched sooner than the 45-minutes claimed in the dossier.

"Forget 45 minutes," said Col al-Dabbagh "we could have fired these within half-an-hour."

Local commanders were told that they could use the weapons only on the personal orders of Saddam. "We were told that when the war came we would only have a short time to use everything we had to defend ourselves, including the secret weapon," he said.

The only reason that these weapons were not used, said Col al-Dabbagh, was because the bulk of the Iraqi army did not want to fight for Saddam. "The West should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight," he said.

"If the army had fought for Saddam Hussein and used these weapons there would have been terrible consequences."

Col al-Dabbagh, who was recalled to Baghdad to work at Iraq's air defence headquarters during the war itself, believes that the WMD have been hidden at secret locations by the Fedayeen and are still in Iraq. "Only when Saddam is caught will people talk about these weapons," he said.

During the Hutton inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly, Sir Richard Dearlove, the head of MI6, said that the information contained in the intelligence dossier relating to the 45-minute claim had come from a single "established and reliable" source serving in the Iraqi armed forces. Privately British intelligence officers have claimed that they believe the original source was killed during the war.

Dr Kelly killed himself last July after it was revealed that he was the source of a BBC radio report claiming that the Labour Government had included the 45-minute claim against the wishes of MI6 to "sex up" the intelligence dossier.

Col al-Dabbagh, who spied for the Iraqi National Accord (INA), a London-based exile group, for several years before the war, said, however, that he provided several reports to British intelligence on Saddam's plans to deploy WMD from early 2002 onwards.

The INA, which was made up of retired and serving Iraqi officers and Ba'ath party officials, is known to have enjoyed a close relationship with MI6 and America's Central Intelligence Agency.

Dr Ayad Allawi, the head of the INA who is now a prominent member of the Governing Council in Baghdad, confirmed that he had passed Col al-Dabbagh's reports on Saddam's WMD to both British and American intelligence officers "sometime in the spring and summer of 2002".

Apart from providing intelligence on Saddam's WMD programme, Col al-Dabbagh also provided details of Iraq's troop and air defence deployments before the war.

Although he gave details of Iraq's battlefield WMD capability, he said that he had no knowledge of any plans by Saddam to use missiles to attack British bases in Cyprus and other Nato targets.

In the build-up to the conflict, Tony Blair was criticised by intelligence officials for giving the impression that Saddam had developed ballistic missiles that could carry WMD warheads and hit targets such as Israel and Britain's military bases in Cyprus.

But Col al-Dabbagh said that he doubted that Iraq under Saddam had this capability. "I know nothing about this. My information was only about what we could do on the battlefield."

Col al-Dabbagh, who received two death threats from Saddam loyalists days after his interview with the Telegraph, said that he was willing to travel to London to give evidence to the Hutton inquiry. "I was there and I knew what Saddam was doing before the war," he said.

An official close to the Hutton inquiry said: "What Mr Dabbagh has to say sounds very interesting and it is certainly new evidence that we will want to look at."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aldabbagh; dabbagh; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
This has more info than previously posted article on same subject.

This is big news.

1 posted on 12/06/2003 5:37:34 PM PST by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
It would sure shut the Libs up if we could find a couple cases of these buried somewhere.
2 posted on 12/06/2003 5:44:36 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
What kind of WMD's could be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades? Sounds like chemical weapons to me.
3 posted on 12/06/2003 5:46:54 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Thanks
4 posted on 12/06/2003 5:47:06 PM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Bravo!
5 posted on 12/06/2003 5:51:43 PM PST by ex-Texan (CBS [SeeBS] Deserves a Long Double Flush . . . Pull the Chain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Is this guy in our custody? Seems like a valuable source.
6 posted on 12/06/2003 5:52:15 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
This IS indeed big news !! Thanks for the post!
7 posted on 12/06/2003 5:53:34 PM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
and what are the chances we will see these on the Front Page of the Gray Lady tomorrow ????

ZERO
8 posted on 12/06/2003 5:57:00 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I am sure Steponallofus will be reporting on this tomorrow, unless it's not in the DNC talking points??? This story makes sense.

Pray for W ant the Truth

9 posted on 12/06/2003 5:57:24 PM PST by bray (The Wicked Witch of NY is Melting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Hmmmmmmmmmmm -- do you think the leftist media, e.g., the NYTimes, WashPost, CBSNBCABCMSNBCCNBCCNN, will bother to report this?!
10 posted on 12/06/2003 5:58:22 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Shall we start a pool as to when the media will announce this news on the front pages?

I'll start....I'm picking NEVER.

Leni

11 posted on 12/06/2003 5:58:22 PM PST by MinuteGal (Florida Freepers! Go to Fla. chapter forum for important announcements on chapter re-organization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Your #3: What kind of WMD's could be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades? Sounds like chemical weapons to me.

Small, easy to conceal, lots of them still out there, and the bad guys know where they are.

12 posted on 12/06/2003 5:59:23 PM PST by White Mountain (By their fruits ye shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
"the secret weapon", were made in Iraq and designed to be launched by hand-held rocket-propelled grenades.

Probably Bio.

The amount of Chem you could put on the front of an RPG would not do much damage to NBC prepared troops, especially in vehicles designed to operate in that enviornment, such as tanks, etc.

Bio, on the other hand.... oh boy.

Suggest reading "The Cobra Event" by Richard Preston, who also wrote "Hot Zone." Cobra Event is not science fiction, it's "science fact."

Cobra Event was required reading in newsrooms all across country right after 9/11.

13 posted on 12/06/2003 6:01:56 PM PST by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper Network station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
The only reason that these weapons were not used, said Col al-Dabbagh, was because the bulk of the Iraqi army did not want to fight for Saddam. "The West should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight," he said. "If the army had fought for Saddam Hussein and used these weapons there would have been terrible consequences." Col al-Dabbagh, who was recalled to Baghdad to work at Iraq's air defence headquarters during the war itself, believes that the WMD have been hidden at secret locations by the Fedayeen and are still in Iraq. "Only when Saddam is caught will people talk about these weapons," he said.

ABC,NBC,CBS....

Anybody?

14 posted on 12/06/2003 6:03:50 PM PST by Indie (We were warned. My people perish for lack of knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
ping
15 posted on 12/06/2003 6:06:39 PM PST by Tribune7 (It's not like he let his secretary drown in his car or something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Could be chemical or biological.
16 posted on 12/06/2003 6:06:41 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
BTTT
17 posted on 12/06/2003 6:08:05 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
One problem with bio weapons, they take time to affect the person being infected with them. On the other hand, Sarin (nerve agent) would be a quick killer of unprotected troops.
18 posted on 12/06/2003 6:24:08 PM PST by GreyFriar (3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Saw it covered on NBC nightly news.
19 posted on 12/06/2003 6:51:55 PM PST by bellevuesbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Assuming this story is true, I would bet on chemical weapons. Biological weapons, as I understand it, require extensive production facilities (to prevent killing all of your production workers, as well as the surrounding population). Such facilities (on the outskirts of Baghdad)would be kind of hard to hide.
20 posted on 12/06/2003 6:53:44 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson