Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly?

UM List ^ | Tim Wilkins

[xzins]

Cruel Joke or Medical Anomaly? Proponents of same-sex "marriage" owe us an answer

by Tim Wilkins

(part of this article may be unsuitable for young readers)

The Physiology of Mankind

"Love and marriage, love and marriage, go together like a horse and carriage. This I tell ya, brother, you can't have one without the other." Neither can you have a marrriage without a man and a woman, unless you’re the Massacheutts Supreme Court–to whom I ask the following question.

Why is one hundred percent of the homosexual population physiologically heterosexual?

When I asked that question before a group of university students, one said the question contained a presumption–that homosexuals were physiologically heterosexual. I am always open to differing views, yet he offered no explanation. In postmodernism one need not waste syllables buttressing one’s views—verbalizing a belief automatically makes it factual. Hubert Humphrey said, "The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously." The student reminded me of a man who, on another occasion, steadfastly disagreed when I said that at conception the man determines the sex of the child. "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but he does not have a right to his own set of facts."

My statement regarding human physiology is neither sexist nor politically motivated. It is a fact.

Look at this statement from two perspectives—first, a theological perspective and second, a medical perspective.

If in fact God creates some people as homosexuals, we must conclude that God has played a cruel joke on them. He has engineered their minds and emotions for attraction to the same-sex and yet created their physiology to be in direct opposition to that attraction. Such an act would be malicious. Only a sadistic god would conceive and conduct such a horrific deed.

Look at the statement from a medical perspective! If homosexuality is a naturally occurring phenomenon—a legitimate alternative to Mankind’s expression of sexuality, we would have to conclude that homosexuals bear severe physiological anomalies.

I am aware the previous conclusion may infuriate some; few things anger people more than uttering a logical thought. Truth has always angered people—which is why some wise sage cautioned, "Tell the truth and run!"

But alas I do not believe the conclusion because I do not believe homosexuality to be moral.

If for no other reason, homosexuality is illegitimate in that it is anatomically unsuitable.

The Ingenuity of the Physical Body

Regardless from where you believe Mankind originated, we must agree that the human body is the work of a genius. How do we account for tear ducts that automatically flush the eye when a microscopic grain of sand invades them? Who can fathom how an arm or leg produces chill bumps, which in turn raises the hairs on those limbs in order to reduce the amount of body heat being expended by a cold wind?

These mysteries of the human body include libido. When sexually aroused, the woman’s body changes through a series of preparations. Her vagina lengthens for a distinct reason. Her body, equipped with Bartholin’s gland, produces lubrication for a distinct reason. More intricate than any scientific invention ever conceived or constructed, the outer third of her vagina swells with blood for a distinct reason. The Psalmist was correct--we are "fearfully and wonderfully made." (Psalm 139:14)

But these incredible workings lead us to another question which refuses to be ignored--why would such physiological changes occur in homosexual women when the changes do nothing to assist sexual interaction?

One cannot simply dismiss the question as irrelevant. If God makes no mistakes, and He does not, what accounts for this dichotomy among homosexuals? If homosexuality is "natural" why the inappropriate and unnecessary body changes?

No legitimate answer exists. God desires each of us to become personally what He has created us to be physiologically, biologically and anatomically.

The Universality of Sin

The answer to why homosexuality exists is sin—a universal condition unconfined to homosexuals; one hundred percent of the world’s population are sinners. "…for all have sinned and come short of God’s glory." (Romans 3:23)

And the answer to sin is Jesus Christ who, by the way, performed His first miracle during the marriage of a man and a woman.

The proponents of homosexual "marriage" appear to have all the answers. What say ye? Is this phenomenon a cruel joke or a medical anomaly?

[RobbyS]

I understand that in the Germany of Hitler's time, there were two types of gays. The "butch type" became Nazis; the "kindler and gentler" type were social democrats, and were the tupe persecuted by the Nazis. Gay propoganda would have it that all homosexuals are of the second type. As if sexual rage were confined to heterosexuals.

[little jeremiah]

Sorry, Alexander the "great" did not engineer in a different kind of government. That particular view of history ignores the ancient history of India, which predated Alexander in empire-ship by many milllenia.

As far as Leonardo, he was a great artist and genius who unfortunately succumbed, from what I have read, to his homosexual attractions. Just imagine how much greater he would have been if his character and behavior had been more healthy and virtuous!

[scripter]

I didn't, I took more from reading the last part of the sentence, while you took more reading the first part. One could consider that sentence to be and oxymoron.

Not one with comprehension skills.

[pgyanke]

By the way, the Jews have a different opinion than you do on the OT and NT.

The Jews don't have a different opinion on the OT and NT as I laid them out for you. For the Jew, the OT is about waiting for the promised Messiah, just as it is for the Christian. Their history is our history. If the Jews accepted the NT as the fulfillment, they would be Christians. I agree that their not accepting the NT means they do have a different interpretation of the work--but not in the way your comments connote.

[little jeremiah]

"The Pink Swastika" is a great book - although not the only one - detailing the relationship between homosexuality and Nazism. There is a book called, I believe, "The Hidden Hitler" recently translated from German that delves into this as well. I would like to read it.

Revisionist history is very dangerous, and that is what the gay activists are foisting on the ignorant public. It is illusion that the Nazis treated all homosexuals alike - how could it be, since many of them were known, flagrant homosexuals as well as pederasts?

Many religious Jews are disgusted and outraged with the gay activists' exploitation of Holocaust musems and displays - trying to ride the coat tails of the legitimate horrors suffered by the Jewish people, by the lie that "gays" were equally discriminated against or targeted for death. Just absolutely not true. Many of the tormentors - both planners and executors - of the destruction of the Jews, were practicing homosexuals.

Only a very small percentage of homosexuals in Germany were even placed in camps, they were never targeted for extinction, and they were almost universally the "effeminate" group of gays, not the ultra masculine Nazi type. Additionally, many of the people put in camps under the "gay" label were political prisoners, priests and others who were railroaded into the camps under the excuse that they were "gay".

(Incidentally, the famous "book burning" the Nazis did was primarily to burn the records of the Sexuality Research Institute that contained many files on their unusual sexual practices. It was CYA for them.)

[scripter]

You need to click the links

Are you going to provide names, or do we have to take your word for it.

Ever hear of Stephen Bennett?

Read this really slowly:

click
the
links

We also have ex-gays on this forum but I'm certainly not going to give you their screen names. Don't forget to click the links.

[scripter]

Are you saying that there was not homosexuality during the time of Ancient Greece.

You either have really horrible comprehension skills, you're playing games or you're just trying to push the homosexual agenda. You appear to be blatantly misrepresenting what I say.

Don't do it again.

[TEXOKIE]

Great post!

Hey mom! AG! You might want to check this out~!

[little jeremiah]

but I tend not to believe that most homosexuals choose to be that way.

I wonder if you have read much of the tremendous mass of information that scripter has on his links. If you have read much of it, you will see that some homosexuals make the claim that they chose their life. Obviously not all, but some do make that claim.

BTW, an opinion, if based on personal emotion and not facts, is just that - an ill-informed opinion.

"Every man is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own set of facts."

I'm not trying to be mean, it's just that ill-informed opinions abound, but if they are not based on facts, wouldn't it be better to read up first and be truly educated about a subject before determining opinions?

[Amelia]

If you have read much of it, you will see that some homosexuals make the claim that they chose their life. Obviously not all, but some do make that claim.

And you're going from that to the claim that most chose their life? If you'll read my post carefully, I said or implied that probably some chose their life.

I'm not trying to be mean, it's just that ill-informed opinions abound, but if they are not based on facts, wouldn't it be better to read up first and be truly educated about a subject before determining opinions?

I'm not trying to be mean either, but it looks to me as if you are guilty of what you're accusing me of.

I suspect that when someone finds the definitive cause of homosexuality, it will be big news - but until then, all any of us has is opinion.

It is also my opinion, based on Romans 1:20-32, that as society becomes more sinful and turns away from God, God allows more sexual sins, including homosexuality. (If you'll read that section, however, you'll see that homosexuality is by no means the only sexual practice God disapproves of.)

[Paul C. Jesup]

You either have really horrible comprehension skills, you're playing games or you're just trying to push the homosexual agenda. You appear to be blatantly misrepresenting what I say.

I was asking a question.

Don't do it again.

If someone asking you a question is to extreme for you, then you won't make it long on FR.

[Paul C. Jesup]

That is one, where is the other 999 to 1999 names.

[Paul C. Jesup]

What part of PCOS is more prevalent in lesbian women. don't you understand?

Oh I forgot, asking you questions are to extreme for you.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Pgyanke, I agree that their not accepting the NT means they do have a different interpretation of the work--but not in the way your comments connote.

That is the exact point I am trying to make.

[Paul C. Jesup]

See port 274.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Sorry, Alexander the "great" did not engineer in a different kind of government. That particular view of history ignores the ancient history of India, which predated Alexander in empire-ship by many milllenia.

I was not talking about 'government', read what I said, I was talking about 'trade'.

As far as Leonardo, he was a great artist and genius who unfortunately succumbed, from what I have read, to his homosexual attractions. Just imagine how much greater he would have been if his character and behavior had been more healthy and virtuous!

Well considering who he was rumored to sleep with, I doubt he would have gotten as far if he had be straight. Anyway, he was a genius who understood more about human nature than you or I. His codex and he studies on the human anatomy for example

[Paul C. Jesup]

There is an entire forum dedicated to religion on FR, why these people do not use it I don't know.

[scripter]

I was asking a question.

Don't play games and don't misrepresent what I say.

[scripter]

And what part of: more prevalent do you not understand? What about the less prevalent? This idea has already been presented to you (by xzins) and you ignored it. When you take the first part of the sentence, some comprehension and a little logic, it's quite obvious what the doctor said. But for some reason you think you can put words in the doctors mouth. I encourage you to write the doctor and ask for yourself.

I mistakenly thought you could put some things together for youself.

[RobbyS]

Gays are master propogandists because so many of them are in the PR fields. I have read that the editorial board of the NYT is full of them. Besides journalism they are in advertising and all the arts. They have really played this victim card for all it is worth. So many Christians have a bad conscience about their own sexual sins that they welcome the notion that God really don't care does one in bed of with whom. This is why some churches have been taken over by militant gays. Give the deil his due, and he knows his own.