That must be hard to do since you post on the WOsD's threads consistently and persistently. Far more than I do.
Prove your claim.
You perhaps are confusing me with another poster, "Robert Paulsen". For in fact I have been spending less and less time on these drug warrior threads.
Really!
Here are your drug warrior related posts since December 1, I don't begin to even touch your total number of posts on the subject. And I have not included our most recent posts back forth on the subject. Sorry for the lack of paragraphs, but the large number of your posts has kept me from being able to compartmentalize all your numerous posts on these drug warrior threads.
To: Nathan Zachary
Slow drivers cause accidents as well. How many of you yell at some old geezer driving 20 miles an hour in a 60 MPH zone? look at all the people trying to get around him on a 2 lane hwy, risking head on collisions?
Let's see: it's the drivers trying to pass who are risking head on collision yet the slow driver is the cause? I find that when I do 70 mph in a 65 mph zone on the Interstate I have people crowding my bumper waiting for the chance to whip around me and I rarely pass anyone myself at that speed. I guess I'm a hazard on the road and a cause of dangerous situations. 84 posted on 12/06/2003 7:04:27 AM PST by TigersEye
To: R. Scott Smoke harms lungs! Truly amazing. Tommorow's headline: Sun rises in the east again! To which a contingent of idiots loudly proclaims: "We told you so!"
130 posted on 12/06/2003 6:54:17 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: AxelPaulsenJr; robertpaulsen; jmc813; No King but Jesus So you admit that No King but Jesus is LeRoy? To: AxelPaulsenJr Not the same guy as MrLeRoy. Neither was The Coach. 103 posted on 12/05/2003 3:57:06 PM EST by Lead Moderator Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! What a maroon. AxelPaulsenJr ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: PaxMacian $50/ounce? All that interdiction isn't making it any more costly. It wasn't that cheap in the 60's. You must be young. A lid went for $5 and a lid was a four finger baggie. Quite a bit more than an ounce. It was up to $15 by 1970 and as much as $35 per weighed oz. by '73 when I graduated HS. Interdiction in and of itself doesn't drive the price up or lessen the supply. It's the mere illegality and prosecution efforts that drive prices. 28 posted on 12/04/2003 7:52:55 PM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: PaxMacian $50 per oz is a lot for Mexican though. $17 on the third turnover is more like it but that would make this bust sound too penny ante. 29 posted on 12/04/2003 7:58:59 PM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: No King but Jesus Such is the nature of a zombie I suppose. They will cheer this up until their own ox is gored and a 20 second "knock-and-kick" home invasion is done to them for something other than drugs. Like, say, suspicion of failure to register an "assault gun!?!" These extra-legal quick fixes never stay where you put them. The nature of a legal precedent is like a hot tar patch on the living room floor. Pretty soon tar has been tracked all over the house. 12 posted on 12/04/2003 6:49:55 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schindler Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] To: robertpaulsen The Supreme Court set no firm limit. Of course not. They have to leave a little wiggle room for themselves. They wouldn't want to be held to account for anything now would they!?! 13 posted on 12/04/2003 6:53:03 AM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schindler Schiavo) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: TigersEye Justice David H. Souter, writing for the court, said that because police believed there were drugs inside, officers had more reason to rush. No kidding!?! Of course the police have reason to rush in they are trying to make a bust. These cases aren't brought to you black-robed-geniuses to tell us what motivates the police. You are supposed to determine the Constitutionality of their actions not their reasons, Idjit. 8 posted on 12/03/2003 8:56:40 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: kattracks Justice David H. Souter, writing for the court, said that because police believed there were drugs inside, officers had more reason to rush. So regardless of why they want you if they believe there are drugs inside they can "knock-and- kick." That's the lie the BATfags told a judge about Koresh and company at Waco in order to get military personnel involved. The Constitution is just buttwipe to these justices. 5 posted on 12/02/2003 10:19:21 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ] ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ; .; ;To: kattracks It's time again to assert what should be obvious. I don't recognize no-knock warrants. Forced entry into my house will be met with lethal force whether it is announced or not. As a U.S. citizen with no legal impediments I am always armed with multiple choices of weapons at hand. I support and encourage all other U.S. citizens to follow this example. 3 posted on 12/02/2003 10:08:46 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
To: Prime Choice bttt 10 posted on 12/02/2003 9:38:53 PM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. - Impeach activist judges!)