Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGE BOUNCES SREISAND PRIVACY SUIT
The Smoking Gun ^ | December 3, 2003 | staff

Posted on 12/04/2003 8:34:55 AM PST by fight_truth_decay

A Los Angeles judge today threw out Barbra Streisand's $10 million suit against a California environmental group that posted a photo of the singer's cliffside Malibu estate on its web site. In a 46-page tentative decision, the summary from which you'll find below, Superior Court Judge Allan J. Goodman declared that the aerial photo's publication was protected by the First Amendment and, to boot, was not "highly offensive to a reasonable person." Swatting away Streisand's claim that her privacy was violated, Goodman stated, "As a matter of law, there is nothing private or personal" about the photo, a copy of which you'll find at right. Making matters worse for the performer, Goodman indicated that he is ready to award legal fees to the California Coastal Records Project and the group's founder Kenneth Adelman, who snapped the image which so offended Babs. (10 pages)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adelman; firstamendment; judgegoodman; streisand
"aerial photo's publication was protected by the First Amendment and, to boot, was not "highly offensive to a reasonable person."

Streisands comment back on November 4th : "A Sad Day for Artistic Freedom (Reagans) ...on her website she writes:"I don't believe Democrats often, if ever, try to muscle the First Amendment like this."

And the cherry on top.. (drum roll)...the judge is ready to award legal fees.


1 posted on 12/04/2003 8:34:56 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Judge: "Bailiff, whack her _________________ " (Fill in the blank)
2 posted on 12/04/2003 8:37:48 AM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
What's her big deal? She's a frickin celebrity! She doesn't expect that pictures of her house will be taken?!?

Anyway, here's another example of the left's obvious hypocrisy. Now, if it were Arnold's house, or RR's house caught on film, and later fought over in court, she'd be the first one "championing the rights of the environmentalists!"

It's just amazing that people actually take these people seriously.
3 posted on 12/04/2003 8:38:38 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

4 posted on 12/04/2003 8:38:38 AM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
That's hugh!

I'm series.

5 posted on 12/04/2003 8:39:57 AM PST by DrNo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

No comments by Babs yet via her website..she may be out trimming her shrubs as she wrote recently:
"One man’s hobby is to fly around spying on people ... my hobby is gardening, caring for my roses, watching things grow! When I get upset, I go out and trim bushes. "

Babs definitely has a thing about Bushes.

6 posted on 12/04/2003 9:14:26 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson