Posted on 12/03/2003 10:23:16 AM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) signed legislation Wednesday that he said would help prevent "sudden and needless destruction" from wildfires like the California blazes that destroyed thousands of homes.
|
"With the Healthy Forest Restoration Act, we will help to prevent catastrophic wildfires," Bush said in a signing ceremony at the Agriculture Department. He was joined by firefighters who fought the Western blazes.
"We're proud to be standing with them up here," the president said. He said wildfires had destroyed 11 million acres over the last two years, and killed 22 people in Southern California this year alone.
Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo., who sponsored the House version of the legislation, compared the measure to President Theodore Roosevelt's call for the establishment of the National Forest system 99 years ago this week.
Critics, however, decried it as a payback to the timber industry, which will get greater access to pristine stands of old-growth trees.
"This law will not prevent every fire but it is an important step forward," the president said. Decrying what he said has been a "misguided forest policy," Bush said that "a lot of people have been well intentioned. They saved the trees. But they lost the forest. We want to save the forest."
"We'll help save lives and property and we'll help protect our forests from sudden and needless destruction," Bush said.
The Senate passed the bill by voice vote on Nov. 21 less than an hour after the House approved it, 286-140.
For three years, a deadlock in the Senate had prevented the passage of legislation intended to speed forest treatment. But 15 raging fires driven by Santa Ana winds through Southern California prompted Democrats to compromise on the bill. The wildfires burned more than 750,000 acres, destroyed 3,640 homes, 33 businesses and 1,141 other structures.
Even after the California fires, 2003 was slightly below average in terms of acres burned and nowhere near the severity of the 2000 and 2002 fire seasons. In the past year, 3.8 million acres have burned across the country. Twenty-eight firefighters died battling the blazes, according to the Wildland Firefighter Foundation.
The bill the first major forest management legislation in a quarter-century is similar to Bush's "Healthy Forests Initiative," which he proposed while touring a charred forest in Oregon in August 2002. The measure streamlines the approval process for projects to cut excess trees out of thick, overgrown forests or stands of trees killed by insect infestation.
Other elements of the president's proposal had already been enacted through administrative actions.
The Bush administration estimates roughly 190 million acres are at risk for a severe fire, an area the size of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming combined.
Sean Cosgrove, a forest expert with the Sierra Club (news - web sites), said some good may come from the increased spending on forest treatment, but there is bound to be unnecessary logging in roadless areas and wildlife habitat as the timber companies try to harvest valuable old-growth trees.
"The timber industry fought real hard for this bill for a reason and it's not because they want to remove brush and chaparral," Cosgrove said. "Through and through this thing is about increasing commercial logging with less environmental oversight."
Since 1999, the timber industry has contributed $14.1 million to political campaigns, 80 percent of it going to Republicans, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics. Bush has received $519,350 from the industry in that period.
The timber industry also spent $23.8 million on lobbying efforts since 2000, according to figures compiled by Political Money Line.
The measure would authorize $760 million a year for thinning projects on 20 million acres of federal land, a $340 million increase. At least half of all money spent on those projects must be near homes and communities.
The bill also creates a major change in the way that federal courts consider legal challenges of tree-cutting projects.
Judges would have to weigh the environmental consequences of inaction and the risk of fire in cases involving thinning projects. Any court order blocking such projects would have to be reconsidered every 60 days.
___
The bill is H.R. 1904.
___
On the Net:
White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov
National Interagency Fire Center: http://www.nifc.gov
Sierra Club: http://www.sierraclub.org
Ping
Wed Dec 3,11:39 AM ET |
U.S. President George W. Bush (news - web sites) appears to touch a small tree as he leaves the stage after signing the Healthy Forests Restoration Act during a ceremony at the Department of Agriculture in Washington December 3, 2003. The new legislation is intended to help prevent the devastating wildfires that have annually plagued the western states. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque REUTERS
Thank You, Envirowackos, for all your misguided efforts in trying to keep the "home fires" burning. Idiots!!! |
President Bush (news - web sites) laughs during a ceremony at the Agriculture Department in Washington Wednesday, Dec. 3,2003, where he signed the Healthy Forest Restoration Act. From left are, Sen. Max Baucus (news, bio, voting record), D-Mont., Sen. Mike Crapo, D-Idaho, Rep. Richard Pombo (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif., Rep. Bob Goodlatte (news, bio, voting record), R-Va., Sen. Thad Cochran (news, bio, voting record), R-Miss., Interior Secretary Gale Norton and Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds) |
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
Since when are the timber companies going to clear away dead and rotting trees? They're going to cut down live standing trees and leave the unsalable crap sitting right where it is now.
LOL!! You are kidding of course. You obviously are clueless how the system works.
Any attempt by a logging company to "clean out" diseased trees would be met by an apeal from some local screwball enviro group. That is if the USFS would even consider a "clean out"...the USFS is incompetent and is now made up almost entirely of employees with degrees in recreation and ecology, biology and wilderness studies. They are the first line of resistance.
But lets for the sake of argument say the USFS agrees to allow a salvage timber sale...say a couple of hundred acres. When the sale is advertised, the first thing that happens is an appeal is filed...don't forget with NEPA the USFS would have to complete an Environmental Impact Study. This normally takes the FS at least two to three years to complete.
Sounds easy, just go in and "clean out" the old dead trees...by the time it happens, if ever, the entire forest is dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.