[donh]

Yet the gunshot claim continues to proliferate due to a concerted effort to sell videos on the topic.

Well, and also due to what anyone whose ever fired an automatic weapon can plainly see by looking at the film--reflections can't produce even timing like that. This so-called analysis is bought and paid for from a defense contractor, and it depends on a bullshit recreation put on by the accused's interested parties. This would not stand up in an honestly run courtroom, any more than a murderer's computer recreation of a murder would.

Like the flim-flam we just went through regarding tanks penetrating the building, this is expensive camoflage the feds have paid through the nose for to make everyone think they didn't see what they obviously saw.

[_Jim]

I'm not going to bother to address anything at all you raise in the way of issues or contentions; you have in the past, argued the smallest of points up to, and including (IMO) the result of simple maths on the level of summing 2 + 2 in order to 'gain traction' in an argument, TO the exclusion of the totality of the evidence.

THIS is disingenuous, bordering on deceit AND a waste of my valuable technical time.

Tilt at this windmill if you wish, construct a website that addresses the issues in question here factually and sign your name to it - and maybe, just maybe I'll take a look at it.

'til then - you're just so much wind ...