THIS is disingenuous, bordering on deceit AND a waste of my valuable technical time.
Tilt at this windmill if you wish, construct a website that addresses the issues in question here factually and sign your name to it - and maybe, just maybe I'll take a look at it.
'til then - you're just so much wind ...
What a bag of wind. The "totality of the evidence" which no one disputes, is that the feds gased and burned and crushed a whole bunch of kids with military equipment, right in front of God, CBS, and everybody, and have been sending out flappers like you to make it seem otherwise for about a decade now.
Valuable technical time indeed. Barfing up expensive, loony, technical-sounding federal ass-covering BS. Fact is, your client had his ass in the crack ever since he bulldozed the crime scene and lost the front door. Something he obviously knew better than to do to a crime scene, unless he had something rather major to hide--as all his subsequent evidence-concocting shenanigans show.
If by, "arguing the smallest points", you mean that I cite federal sources in great detail to support my points, and actually do the math implied by their data, than I have to agree with you.
As an example. I'd like to point out that when the court of science is offered, as an explanation of an observed event, a choice between a highly miraculous explanation, or an explanation not yet presented to the court, science has, so far, observed that the first choice has a 100% failure rate.
What are the odds that the front door was ACCIDENTLY lost, the crime scene was ACCIDENTLY bulldozed, the CS gas's flammable component was ACCIDENTLY added to the equation, the children's corpses were ACCIDENTLY de-refrigerated, the flashbangs were ACCIDENTLY omitted from testimony, and the FLIR film ACCIDENTLY recorded shard reflection as automatic weapons fire.
Do the math, and tell us which scientific explanation holds water: a) gosh, it was just the darndest accident. b) the feds colluded to hide their guilt in the intentional murder of those children.
The feds lied and lied and lied about the flashbangs, on the record, in court, in front of god and everybody. That makes them officially liers, whose evidence must be regarded as concocted, by an honestly run court, not packed to the rafters with federal whores. As has so far been observed. What that means, is that we can draw a pretty glaringly obvious conclusion, which an honest court would have to underwrite:
The feds filled that building with CS gas, ventilated it, and then tossed a couple of flashbangs in simultaneously to create a couple of fireballs at once, and cause a flashover, to destroy all the witnesses and evidence, just as was the reason for the door disappearing, the crime scene disappearing, the bodies disappearing, the timing of the attack to make it look like the davidians could have started simultaneous fireballs with some kerosene, at least to the undereducated, and the court records being intentionally falsified.
You are testifying on behalf of judicially know liars using evidence they supplied, from an FBI lab that has already been embarassed several times for producing politically correct, rather than forensically correct "evidence". I don't believe squat about any evidence that came willingly from federal sources about this, and neither should anyone with an ounce of decency still clinging to their bones.