Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officer ‘leaked email to save lives’
ic Wales ^ | 11/27/2003

Posted on 11/27/2003 8:42:38 AM PST by dighton

A British intelligence officer charged with leaking a top-secret memo to the press has appeared in court.

Katharine Gun, 29, is charged under Section 1 of the Official Secrets Act.

Mrs Gun, from Moor End Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire worked for the Government communications headquarters GCHQ as a translator at the security services main monitoring centre in Cheltenham.

It is claimed she leaked an email from American spies asking British counterparts to tap telephones.

Mrs Gun appeared in the dock at Bow Street Magistrates Court, central London only to confirm her name and address.

Ben Emmerson QC, representing Mrs Gun, said: “We will be entering a not guilty plea. I shall make it clear that she does not dispute she is responsible for leaking an email, the subject of this charge.

“Her defence will be her actions were justified by a defence of necessity. The disclosure made by her was a sincere attempt to prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens.”

Edward Brown, prosecuting, said the case raised some potentially very complex issues and legal questions. The court heard that there were issues over what instructions the defendant can give to her defence solicitors.

Mrs Gun was sacked from GCHQ in June. She was charged on November 13.

Senior district judge Timothy Workman granted unconditional bail to Mrs Gun until January 19 for a further appearance at Bow Street before the matter is transferred to Crown Court.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: espionage; gchq; iraq; katharinegun; nsa; securitycouncil; treason; unitednations

1 posted on 11/27/2003 8:42:38 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dighton
I wish she were here so we could hang her.
2 posted on 11/27/2003 9:00:19 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
She is a disgrace.
3 posted on 11/27/2003 9:03:06 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
“Her defence will be her actions were justified by a defence of necessity. The disclosure made by her was a sincere attempt to prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens.”

What a twisted person... she should be hung for endangering the lives of servicemen and civilians.

4 posted on 11/27/2003 9:05:51 AM PST by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; Catspaw; hellinahandcart; All
“The disclosure made by her was a sincere attempt to prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens.”

Sorry, not buying that as a defense or that as fact.

7 posted on 11/27/2003 9:18:04 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Whose lives, exactly, was it that were being "saved"?

Not the victims who otherwise would have suffered under a growing repression that would have been practiced by Saddam Hussein who had NOT been removed from power. Not the vast numbers of "soft" targets that would have otherwise been struck by terrorists not engaged in a futile attempt to defend what remains of the Ba'athist regime in Iraq.

Certainly, a number of soldiers have been engaged in these firefights, and occasional ambushes, and have died, with more maimed as a result of these confrontation. Some civilians have died or suffered casualties in the crossfire. Large numbers of irregular combatants have died in defense of a failed cause.

But what benefit would result in reversal of the sentence of doom that has been pronounced upon the Ba'athist regime of Iraq? Humbling of the US Bush Administration? And whom would that help? Anybody we should like?
8 posted on 11/27/2003 9:20:21 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens

There is no telling how many lives she cost. This pig must do hard time for life if she is not executed.

9 posted on 11/27/2003 9:22:29 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
“Her defense will be her actions were justified by a defense of necessity. The disclosure made by her was a sincere attempt to prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens.”

Since when is faith a defense?

"I had conviction when I stabbed her to death, your honor. I felt I was doing the right thing. I am not guilty. I think I may have even saved lives."

There are so many flaws in this defense council's argument that he should just stay home when this case comes to trial. And the prosecutor had better show effort in the trial, and quit mumbling that half-assed "complex issue" blather.
10 posted on 11/27/2003 9:37:45 AM PST by APFel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
This woman has no right to make a ministers, or more probably, a Prime Ministers decision.

Imagine the chaos if everyone in the chain of command or gov't could just decide to do as they please!

How many people in a Nation even have a big enough "picture" to justify their decision, three or four? The hubris here is unbelievable!

The only justifyible claim would be that routing this to the proper minister would have taken too long the damage was imminent and so she took matters into hand. AND IS CONTENT TO LIVE WITH THE DECISION OF THE COURT! What do you want to bet that she wants to get off?

A PREDICTION::::As they lose traction and power this is just the beginning of the left's descent into rage. They will begin terrorist activities in America and Britian WITHIN three years. That's what they ALWAYS do. Remember, you read it here, or, as an intelligent, observant Conservative, you predicted it yourself recently!
11 posted on 11/27/2003 9:46:45 AM PST by TalBlack ("Tal, no song means anything without someone else...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The facility she worked at is a main center for British Intelligence operations. Kinda like the equivalent to our NSA. Very hush hush.

The British Official Secrets Act once was very strictly enforced. Cases of its violation usually never made it to the press. Times do change. I expect a conviction;sentenced to 10 yrs and she will be out in 3-4. We'll see.

12 posted on 11/27/2003 10:01:36 AM PST by Khurkris (Ranger On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The guy who did a pre-employment background check on her should be sacked as well!!!
13 posted on 11/27/2003 10:09:12 AM PST by Robert Drobot (God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
A story from 11/14/03, with more detail.
14 posted on 11/27/2003 10:23:45 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
Her defence will be her actions were justified by a defence of necessity

Sounds like a good defense to pursue in the Senate Intelligence committee memo leak.

15 posted on 11/27/2003 12:28:41 PM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; BlueLancer; Poohbah; Catspaw; hellinahandcart
The disclosure made by her was a sincere attempt to prevent what she believed to be an unlawful war and saved the lives of British servicemen and women and Iraqi citizens.”

Wellnow, there's a novel defense - "the ends justify the means". Might as well try to run the table if you're going to pull that one out of your dark and stinky place - no doubt releasing the e-mail also ended homelessness, cured cancer, and saved Christmas....

16 posted on 11/27/2003 8:01:04 PM PST by general_re (Take away the elements in order of apparent non-importance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: general_re; dighton; BlueLancer; Poohbah; Catspaw; hellinahandcart
This nitwit was under the influence ...

... of Harold Pinter and his sock puppet, former scientist Richard Dawkins.
17 posted on 11/27/2003 9:22:58 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson