Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


The International Thermonuclear Energy Reactor (Iter) is an international collaboration between the EU, USA, Canada, Russia, China and South Korea.

The aim is to design and build a fusion reactor in about a decade at a cost of $5bn. Iter will bridge the gap between current fusion reactors and a commercial plant.



Iter will be based on Jet - the Joint European Torus. In Jet the plasma is shaped like a doenut and confined by a magnetic field.

Coming into operation in 1983, Jet achieved a world record for fusion achieving 12.9 MW output in a 1997 experiment.



The European candidate for the Iter site is situated inland from Marseille on the Mediterranean coast.

Operated by France's Atomic Energy Commission, Cadarache is already the site of extensive fusion research including the Tore Supra tokomak experiment.

1 posted on 11/26/2003 7:15:04 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
Somebody better let Martin Sheen know about this so that he can get his protest signs printed in advance...
2 posted on 11/26/2003 7:17:12 AM PST by Born Conservative ("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This could be as revolutionary as Japan's 10 billion dollar fifth generation computer language that revolutionized data processing a decade ago.
3 posted on 11/26/2003 7:17:13 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Forget Japan..as long as Kim is in control of DNK, with its missiles..the plant is a target...
4 posted on 11/26/2003 7:21:11 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"Spain had initially put forward its own choice of Vandellos but then fell in line with its EU partners ...."

Fell inline with it's EU MASTERS is more like it ...

With the big bosses skimming off the cream of the "Union" how long will it be until some country needs to figure just how to unscramble the EUROmess ?
7 posted on 11/26/2003 7:26:10 AM PST by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
The European Union has chosen France as its preferred location for a nuclear reactor...

France is preferred because, if the reactor goes Chernobyl, nothing important will be destroyed. 8^)

It seriously ticks me off that the Greens have managed to kill reactor construction here, yet France can build as many as needed.

8 posted on 11/26/2003 7:26:44 AM PST by AngryJawa ("The bang is great, but the shockwave is where it’s at.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
I hope they build better reactors than cars. Remember "LeCar"?
10 posted on 11/26/2003 7:30:21 AM PST by Semper Vigilantis (The best defense is a pre-emptive strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

11 posted on 11/26/2003 7:34:15 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
shouldn't they be required to display an ability to send their lone aircraft carrier on a sustained deployment first? talk about letting the kids run with scissors.
16 posted on 11/26/2003 7:46:29 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
FYI: At the moment, the only way to create a functional fusion reactor is by using some amount of Tritium.
To create Tritium, you need a neutron source (ie fission reactor) and processing is similar to Plutonium (other than the toxic problems).

As they said when they were creating the first H-bomb, "We can create 100 lbs of Pu239 or 100 oz of Tritium."

25 posted on 11/26/2003 8:38:57 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Exclusive look at the new technology:


29 posted on 11/26/2003 10:05:13 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Advocates say commercial fusion plants of the future could be cheap to run and environmentally friendly, with much less radioactive waste produced.

Let me then be the first to predict: The Environmental Wacko Community, AKA the Watermelon Crowd will be violently against it.

They are against all energy production since it is the availabilitiy of energy that produces improvements in the human condition, a movement they are firmly opposed to.

31 posted on 11/26/2003 10:13:54 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
What about crystallic fusion? (This has been repeatedly described by space ranger Buzz Lightyear and is instrumental to the vibrant economy in sector 12.)
33 posted on 11/26/2003 10:24:47 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
The European Union has chosen France as its preferred location for a nuclear reactor

"Because everybody hates the (deleted) French, anyway, so we don't care if they have FLKs."

42 posted on 11/26/2003 1:07:04 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Everyone should keep in mind that the
total (not just the US's contribution)
cost is comparable to ten space shuttle flights.
The Physicists seem confident that this big
machine will have a 'power gain' (Q) of at least ten.
If that term means thermal-power out, divided by
beam power-in, that should be slightly above
'electrical' break even.
47 posted on 11/26/2003 9:46:55 PM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson