To: Sam Cree
"I think an official accusation gets it done."As does 10 acres of marijuana plants on one's property and 250 pounds of marijuana in one's barn.
But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).
To: robertpaulsen
Yeah, 10 acres on 320 acres that he wasn't working because he just lost his life. How many acres do you have and can you vouch that you know exactly what is on each and every square inch of that land?
To: robertpaulsen
"But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)." Yes, but are you OK with property confiscation before a man is found guilty by a court of law?
11 posted on
11/23/2003 12:26:26 PM PST by
Sam Cree
(democrats are herd animals)
To: robertpaulsen
But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).Dude, he was grieving his wife. He may not have walked his property in a year.
13 posted on
11/23/2003 12:28:37 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(I like my women as I like my coffee: Cold and bitter.)
To: robertpaulsen
"As does 10 acres of marijuana plants on one's property and 250 pounds of marijuana in one's barn. But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). "
purely circumstantial evidence, my friend....
now, if you, personally, saw him smoke 250 pounds of....
23 posted on
11/23/2003 12:44:43 PM PST by
hoot2
To: robertpaulsen
I live in a mountainous area of 10 to 100 parcels. On a regular basis owners discover that pot growers have sneaked onto their land and planted in places that are rarely seen. I personally don't know what's going on on every inch of my real estate 24/7.
25 posted on
11/23/2003 12:49:04 PM PST by
EggsAckley
(..................."Dean's got Tom McClintock Eyes".........................)
To: robertpaulsen
He was found not guilty. The government still hasn't given his property back. You don't have a problem with that?
40 posted on
11/23/2003 1:16:29 PM PST by
ellery
To: robertpaulsen
"I think an official accusation gets it done." As does 10 acres of marijuana plants on one's property and 250 pounds of marijuana in one's barn.
But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).
It seems from this dialogue that you agree that if the owner did not know about it, then he shouldn't have his property siezed?
To: robertpaulsen
But that shouldn't count because "he didn't know" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)
I live in an apartment. I go into the basement once a year. Last time I went down there, there was a fridge, which, it turned out, had been hooked up to my power for a year. Of course, I'm lying and I knew all about it. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
To: robertpaulsen
"As does 10 acres of marijuana plants on one's property and 250 pounds of marijuana in one's barn."
Hey Bob, I see your still around as clueless as ever.
91 posted on
11/23/2003 2:58:19 PM PST by
Kerberos
To: robertpaulsen
I'll plant a few weeds on your property and then take your property and split up the booty with some other thugs. You don't mind do you? Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
136 posted on
11/24/2003 7:28:45 AM PST by
Protagoras
(Putting goverment in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
To: robertpaulsen
"10 acres of marijuana plants on one's property and 250 pounds of marijuana in one's barn." Perhaps your distortion is unintended, or just ignorance...
An "estimated" total of the grass found was alleged to be roughly 250 pounds.
I know how the agents grab this stuff, because a guy who lived near me got popped some years ago. The Feds grabbed the whole plant with clods of dirt on the roots and weighed the entire mess still wet.
The neighbor's two plants would have rendered 2-4 ounces of cured pot... less than is needed to get a conviction for "intent to distribute." On the other hand, he was charged with possession of 8 pounds due to the officers' knowingly fraudulent collection methods.
The agents know how this stuff is processed for use, and to knowingly misrepresent to the courts that this guy had "8 pounds" and intended to "distribute" was clearly a felony on the part of the thus-purjored agents.
But, I guess that taking a dangerous criminal off of the streets is more important than those silly Laws, huh? Not how the law was designed to work, my friend.
;-/
253 posted on
12/01/2003 12:00:03 PM PST by
Gargantua
(Embrace clarity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson