or will men walk down the aisle to "Today I Met the Boy I'm Going to Marry," as David Tutero and Ryan Jurica did last SeptemberOh puh-leeze.
1 posted on
11/23/2003 10:33:14 AM PST by
putupon
To: Admin Moderator; All
This is an excerpt, forgot to mark the buton.
2 posted on
11/23/2003 10:34:43 AM PST by
putupon
(Go Hoo's-Beat VT!!!)
To: putupon
Will condoms be thrown at the newly wedded gay couple instead of rice?
3 posted on
11/23/2003 10:37:34 AM PST by
Momaw Nadon
(The mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work unless it's open.)
To: putupon
I guess the gay priest concludes the ceremony with "the husband may now suck the **** of the bride"
4 posted on
11/23/2003 10:39:17 AM PST by
thoughtomator
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: putupon
gay divorce lawyers will do well.....who gets the poodle...
medical insurance rates will go through the roof....
and in the end many normal familes will be without coverage
& course this will lead to Hillary care
5 posted on
11/23/2003 10:40:32 AM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: putupon
It also makes one think that same-sex weddings may soon become nearly as common... That's because these "marriages" will have the lifespans of fruitflies and the participants will be back to repeatedly desecrate more altars.
7 posted on
11/23/2003 10:45:53 AM PST by
Plutarch
To: putupon
Fixed, but you don't have to excerpt NYT.
To: putupon
They can call it what they want, but it will never be a marriage.
9 posted on
11/23/2003 10:48:44 AM PST by
mom-7
To: putupon
Minister: "You may kiss the bride. Which one of you is the bride? Okay -- butch one, you may kiss the effeminate one. I now pronounce you man, er, woman, er ... whichever...and spouse. Whatever!"
To: putupon
Next up...pedophiles will be able to marry their "sweethearts."
Liberals will champion this as an "alternate lifestyle" and will label anyone who disagrees as "pedophobic."
12 posted on
11/23/2003 10:52:24 AM PST by
Prime Choice
(Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
To: putupon
Eyuch... now it's not the Best Man... it's the Best Queer !!!
15 posted on
11/23/2003 10:59:38 AM PST by
GeekDejure
(<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
To: putupon
she said, adding that the couple wore whatever they well pleased, "heels if they were men. It was a big, fun, campy thing. Now, it's just as serious as a traditional straight wedding."They are wanting to present to normal people that they aren't the flamboyant freaks that they actually are.
18 posted on
11/23/2003 11:04:19 AM PST by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: putupon
What will be considered failure to consummate one of these so-called 'marriages'?
20 posted on
11/23/2003 11:16:14 AM PST by
Loyalist
(Oldthinkers unbellyfeel Amchurch.)
To: putupon
It also makes one think that same-sex weddings may soon become nearly as commonplace as the traditional black tie, country club and limousine kind. Maybe in San Francisco and Provincetown, but not where I live. Besides, how can 2% of the population do anything that becomes equally commonplace as what the other 98% are doing. The author is clueless.
To: putupon
Now, it's just as serious as a traditional straight wedding." It has long been rumored that in the course of ordinary events a moment in time comes when some peculiar event occurs for the first time and somewhere a bell rings; this bell is the one that sounds the knell for the death of all that came before it.
The phrase form the article quoted above suggests that this may be such a moment, for if the fun has gone out of "gay" marriage, then what is the point?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson