Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JACKO ABUSE ACCUSER, KIN STILL LIVING A NIGHTMARE 10 YRS. LATER
New York Post ^ | November 23, 2003 | LINDA STASI

Posted on 11/23/2003 10:24:32 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

ACCUSING Michael Jackson of sexual abuse comes with a hefty price tag.

A decade after shocking the world with allegations in 1993 that he was molested by the bizarro superstar, the lives of a California man and his relatives remain a living hell.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arkansasmafia; celebrity; celebritymorals; childmolester; clintonalumni; clintonhaters; hillarylist; hollywood; hollywoodmorals; hollywoodpinglist; homosexualvice; jackson; kingofpop; michaeljackson; mjacksonenablers; molester; nambla; pederast; pedophile; pellicano; popculture; protectboyscouts; sodomy; uglyphoneypervert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: cajungirl
"Jackson might not be a known pedophile in your book, but do you think it odd that he is a known pedophile in many other's books."

Whose book?

The only one that matters as far as that's concerned are Court records.

And I dare you to point out the media outlet that's used the words "known pedophile" when describing Michael Jackson during broadcast, or in print.

Show me.

"If you don't see that he is known as a pedophile and wonder why others see him as that then you are mightly willing to ignore smoke all around."

I guess we should have listened to the people in FR arguing that David Westerfield was not guilty of murdering Danielle Van Dam.

When I arrive at conclusions on issues, I do it by examining every fact available, and not by sticking my wetted finger up in the air to find out which way the winds of public opinion are blowing.

81 posted on 11/24/2003 9:46:22 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
"DeSales explained. "It can include rape, it can include sodomy, it can include oral copulation, things like that. But it does require some touching by the adult with the minor somewhere on his body."

By "somewhere on his body" I take it he meant "anywhere on his body".

So, under that definition, an adult can be charged with lewd and lascivious acts on a child as a result of a simple hand shake or a hug?

82 posted on 11/24/2003 9:49:34 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Rizzo, LeToy's ex-husband, and others who have more inside information than any of us have labled Jacko a pedophile. Now his letters, the deposition of his first accuser, and his connection with a mob figure sure paint a horrible picture.

What is fact is that he is abusing children he claims are his. Imagine forcing them to wear veil or animal masks and dangling a baby from the balcony. If it were us, there would have been an investigation and CPS would have been involved.

83 posted on 11/24/2003 9:53:48 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
cant be charged for a handshake. Also included is that the touching has to be with arrousal of the perp or child or intended to arouse the child or something to that effect. I don't think a simple handshake would be calculated to arouse.
84 posted on 11/24/2003 11:16:20 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LaraCroft
Thank you for your post #6. I now know there actually are people out there who would willingly send their child over for Jacko "sleepovers". Some are even on FR, sadly...
85 posted on 11/24/2003 11:20:09 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
What, exactly, did/does Pellicano do for a living?


We know for one that he's a thug who likes to intimidate anyone who press charges.
86 posted on 11/24/2003 11:37:51 AM PST by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis-
Would you let your kids go to a 'sleepover' at Neverland?

I don't think you would.

Sometimes if it looks like a skunk, has a stripe down it's back, stinks to high heaven, and is eating your flowers, guess what? It's a skunk.
87 posted on 11/24/2003 11:53:28 AM PST by GWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Jacksons a predator who preys on children, protected by being part of an industry that itself largely preys on children.... so its not suprising in the least to see the industry continue to rally around the sicko... he is the personification of the entertainment industry.
88 posted on 11/24/2003 11:57:45 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pegita
"Just a thought in passing, LaraCroft, but it's most unusual for a "femaile" to misspell the word "female." Perhaps it has something to do with your post on your About Page .. "I am the freakin poster child for diversity." If you'd care to elaborate ... "

Haa Haa Ha.

I type very very, very quickly and never use spell check, since I am an excellent ... speller, for the most part.

Ha
89 posted on 11/24/2003 12:44:35 PM PST by LaraCroft (Grrr baby, very very grrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GWfan
Cute little "if it looks like a duck" sayings are not called for right now, sometimes looks are deceiving (you know that cute little saying, don't you?), what's called for right now is an intense investigation to settle the question once and for all.

If Michael molested this child, and I mean molested, not hugged, or held, then he should go to jail, if he did not, then this kid’s mother should go to jail.

If you want to judge people on their appearances, or because they are out of the norm, that’s your prerogative, I’ll wait until something is available other than accusations and media hype to begin making up my mind.

90 posted on 11/24/2003 1:12:39 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
"I don't think a simple handshake would be calculated to arouse."

I don't see how the sight of someone’s shoes can be considered sexually arousing, but it does arouse some people, so, the action itself is not as pertinent as the result of it.

If Jacko gets off by shaking a kid’s hand, then, the definition fits.

91 posted on 11/24/2003 1:16:18 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GWfan
"Would you let your kids go to a 'sleepover' at Neverland?"

I would never allow my kids to sleep over (alone) at anyone's place who is not a member of their immediate family.

That’s why I also believe that there I something wrong with this kid’s mother.

92 posted on 11/24/2003 1:19:03 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I'm not minimizing the effect of this kind of behavior, I"m just saying that it's not as bad as murder as you're saying it is. That's all.

Of course murder victims don't suffer for decades after the crime. Ask any woman who has been molested by a family member.

I have to say that a lot of what has been presented on this thread is very questionable. I would never leave my children alone with an uncle who made a habit of kissing school-aged children. I suppose culture makes some difference here, so if I'm out of line, bring it on.

93 posted on 11/24/2003 1:36:22 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: IncredibleHulk
In fact, they inititiate it usually. I am the father and protector they never had because their own father was an abuser and molester. Only at my house were they ever really safe.

I am treading on thin ice here, but I spent seven years in children's protective services. Where and how do you suppose the kids learned that hugging and kissing men other than their husband is the usual and customary approach to friendship between girls and men?

94 posted on 11/24/2003 1:43:01 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
Yeah. After this, I don't see why anybody would be willing to settle a case with Michael Jackson.
95 posted on 11/24/2003 2:04:29 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Wow...so you think his crime as described should be punished the same way you would punish a murderer?

I'll go a step further. If evidence shows that Michael Jackson is guilty of child molestation, I'd like for him to get the death penalty or at the very least, life in prison with no parole. Ditto for all pedophiles. IMO, they're similar to murderers. They kill the innocent lives of children. Its high time that the punishment fit the crime for perverts who ruin the lives of children, preying on them for their own deviant self gratification. It is a fact that pedophiles cannot be cured & continue to re-offend. Society has been negligent in dealing with these vermin & we need new laws to address fairness and justice.
96 posted on 11/24/2003 2:26:28 PM PST by right wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
My thoughts exactly.
97 posted on 11/24/2003 2:33:20 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I don't see how the sight of someone’s shoes can be considered sexually arousing, but it does arouse some people

According to 288(a), and your strange example, there's no correlation. The statute requires that lewd and lascivious act(s) must involve touching the child's body. In your other odd example of handshaking, do you actually believe a District Attorney would charge someone with handshaking and try to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the perp is being sexual aroused or gratified by shaking hands? DA's usually don't go to trial unless they believe they have a very good chance of winning a jury verdict. Of course, they're not always right about the strength of their case (the Bryant case in CO comes to mind), but if you're seriously suggesting that Jackson might be charged with something as benign as shaking a child's hand, there's not much to discuss.

98 posted on 11/24/2003 3:05:41 PM PST by lonevoice (Legal disclaimer: The above is MY OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You're quoting someone that MTV dug up. I'm quoting the exact penal code

DeSales is an Orange County criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor for Los Angeles County. The fact that MTV is quoting him doesn't detract from his credentials.

288(a): Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes provided for in Part 1

You might check Part 1 of the statute to see what crimes are provided for there.

When the Santa Barbara guy was giving his news conference, he made it a point to say that it wasn't oral copulation

Whether or not Jackson is being charged with oral copulation, I don't know. If the DA said no in a press conference, then I'd believe him. I didn't see the news conference. But, Section 288(a) would be the appropriate code with which to file that charge.

99 posted on 11/24/2003 3:16:54 PM PST by lonevoice (Legal disclaimer: The above is MY OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LaraCroft
You're either obtuse or one of those Jacko fanatics.
100 posted on 11/24/2003 4:56:37 PM PST by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson