Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jacqueline Kennedy’s bloody suit
MSNBC ^ | 22-November-2003 | Pedantic_Lady

Posted on 11/21/2003 4:54:38 PM PST by Pedantic_Lady

WASHINGTON — Not long after that terrible day in Dallas — no one knows exactly when — a brown paper box arrived at the National Archives. The return address was on O Street, the Georgetown home of Jacqueline Kennedy’s mother. Packed inside was the pink Chanel suit first glimpsed Nov. 22, 1963, when the first lady joined JFK at a Fort Worth breakfast, and which, covered in his blood, she still wore the next morning to escort the slain president’s casket into the White House.

THERE IN THE Archives, the suit remains. Stored in a custom-designed corrugated board box, it rests on a gray steel shelf in a secured area of a suburban warehouse. It has never been cleaned. The wool skirt and jacket lie flat, with a suggestion of human form created by acid-free tissue paper folded inside the sleeves.

Only recently was a deed of gift obtained from the Kennedys’ sole surviving child, Caroline. But one hundred years will have to pass before the suit can again come before the American public. This condition is consistent with Mrs. Kennedy’s determination to balance her obligations to history with her family’s privacy. Archivists’ interests, moreover, are not only the past and present, but the future.

“Once it can be displayed it will really bring the ’60s to the present — whatever that present is,” said Steven Tilley, who oversees the Archives’ JFK Assassination Records Collection.

The Archives also has JFK’s jacket, shirt and tie — exhibits in the Warren Commission investigation of the shooting. But aside from the Brooks Brothers overcoat Abraham Lincoln wore to Ford’s Theater on April 14, 1865 — the lining embroidered with an American eagle and the words “One Country/One Destiny” — perhaps no clothing in American history carries the iconic power of that pink suit.

Even out of sight, it is an indelible image in public memory. The first lady made sure of that. She purposefully bore the horror and brutality of the president’s murder for a shattered nation to see. Had she changed or shielded her appearance, Americans’ experience of the assassination would have been fundamentally altered.

“Everybody remembers the pink suit,” Tilley said. Mrs. Kennedy brought nothing new to Texas, her press secretary, Pamela Turnure, recalled in Carl Sferrazza Anthony’s book, “As We Remember Her.” She took two suits, a cocktail dress and a day dress already in her wardrobe. Her clothes stole the show on foreign trips; on a domestic political trip, Turnure said, she didn’t want to deflect attention from the president.

A VISION IN PINK

The morning of Nov. 22, a crowd gathered at the president’s Fort Worth hotel. “Where’s Jackie?” admirers shouted when JFK appeared. “Mrs. Kennedy is organizing herself,” the president replied. “It takes longer. But of course she looks better than we do after she does it.”

Two-thousand Texans roared their approval when a vision in pink — JFK had picked the suit — finally walked into the Chamber of Commerce breakfast. Then it was on to Dallas. At 12:30 p.m., shots were fired at the motorcade, which then sped to Parkland Hospital. The Secret Service hurried Lady Bird Johnson out of her limousine, but not before she glanced over her shoulder. She described the scene to the Warren Commission: “I ... saw, in the president’s car, a bundle of pink, just like a drift of blossoms, lying on the back seat. I think it was Mrs. Kennedy lying over the President’s body.”

In her autobiography, Lady Bird recalled the scene aboard Air Force One while accompanying the casket to Washington: “Mrs. Kennedy’s dress was stained with blood. One leg was almost entirely covered with it and her right glove was caked, it was caked with blood — her husband’s blood. Somehow that was one of the most poignant sights — that immaculate woman exquisitely dressed, and caked in blood.”

FIRST LADY UNWAVERING

Mrs. Kennedy repeatedly rebuffed suggestions, beginning in the chaos outside Parkland’s trauma room, that she change clothes. In “The Death of a President,” William Manchester chronicled how tensions on Air Force One grew with “the feeling that something must be done about her appearance.” Mrs. Johnson tried; so, later, did Mrs. Kennedy’s own mother, Janet Auchincloss.

But she didn’t waver. Ambassador John Kenneth Galbraith had admired the first lady’s “excellent sense of theater” during a triumphant 1962 visit to India. What the fashion industry dubbed “the Jackie look,” the first lady saw as her “state wardrobe.” Through elegantly simple lines and a dazzling rainbow of strong solid colors — ice blue, leaf green, lemon yellow — she conveyed the youth, grace and style of President Kennedy’s New Frontier. Pink ran throughout, from a shell pink sequined chiffon evening gown to what Galbraith called a “radioactive pink” rajah-style coat.

With the president dead, that sense of theater turned to a new and determined purpose. “Keeping that clothing on was completely consistent with her realization that clothing is a medium of expression, and she wanted to say something to the world,” said Wake Forest University art Professor David Lubin, author of “Shooting Kennedy: JFK and the Culture of Images.”

‘WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO JACK’

Mrs. Johnson never forgot the essence of that message, or the fierceness in the 34-year-old widow’s voice as she refused all entreaties to change her clothes. “I want them to see what they have done to Jack,” she said.

In that suit she stood at Lyndon B. Johnson’s side as he took the oath of office on Air Force One, “a silhouette from another world,” as Manchester put it. At Andrews Air Force Base, a proposal was made to exit the plane on the starboard side to avoid news photographers. She rejected it. One of the last pictures of her in the suit is in the East Room. Her shoulders hang heavily. Smeared blood covers a leg, and her gaze is fixed on the casket being lowered onto the catafalque.

At every sight of her, the nation’s grief deepened. In the private quarters of the White House, sometime around dawn on Nov. 23, she finally shed her bloodied clothing.

It’s hard to imagine, with her acute appreciation of history, that Mrs. Kennedy made no provision for the pink suit. Her maid later told Manchester that, while Mrs. Kennedy bathed, she “packed the clothes and hid the bag.” But there is no known record in the Archives explaining who later sent the box or why. There is only the return address, and in it, one small clue: an old postal zone used before zip codes, which began that July. So archivists speculate that it came to them not long after Nov. 22, 1963.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: jfk; kennedyassassination
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: MinuteGal
However, in the context of today's liberal thought processes, "they" means the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Funny you should mention that. MSNBC had a special on JFK the other nite. Chris Matthews was interviewing Hilary. She said something to the effect of "blah blah blah, I'll never forget when..." and then quoting Jackie, " I want them to see what THEY did to my husband." I believe Hilary repeated that quote, and with emphasis. She was getting her right wing conspiracy point made.

61 posted on 11/21/2003 11:19:39 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Take my advice; I don't use it anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
I guess no one else is interested, but I don't think it's fair of you to leave us hanging.

Tell us more.
62 posted on 11/21/2003 11:49:19 PM PST by lambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
I should add, my wife went to law school with JFK, Jr., and we were both practicing law in NY during the years the poor guy was trying to pass the bar, so your meeting him's not really all that remarkable to me. But Oswald's daughter? How'd that happen?
63 posted on 11/21/2003 11:54:09 PM PST by lambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
Your # 61 was most interesting and is indicative of my previous point. My appreciation for your sharp memory and for posting your recollection.

Leni

64 posted on 11/22/2003 4:42:05 AM PST by MinuteGal (Everyone...start saving your pesos for the next cruise. Great mutual Christmas gift for the family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
I've probably read 90% of the books written on the subject, and have reached a conclusion that just about ties up all the loose ends. I was 10 at the time, but my parents were able to give me a rather unique perspective on the matter, which fueled my later interest.

I'm curious! Please tell the conclusion you reached that tied up all the loose ends.
65 posted on 11/22/2003 5:10:16 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nicksaunt
Thank you for posting the article regarding the pink suit. I had no idea that it had been donated to the National Archives, for some reason I thought it had been given to Jackie's mother.

The theory is that Jackie's mother donated it to the National Archives.

I wasn't around for the Kennedy assassination, but if it was anything close to the level of the emotion and fear on 9/11, I'm especially glad to have missed it.

66 posted on 11/22/2003 7:36:26 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Burn24
You know what I've never understood? What was that business with her crawling over the trunk of the limo? Seems to me your first instinct in a situation like that would be to hold your loved one close to your heart, try to protect him, as Mrs. Connoly did.

She did it to give a Secret Service agent a hand onto the back of the limo. If you see all of the footage and photographs taken of the assassination, it's obvious what she's doing...but the excerpts don't make her look good. When she did that the car was speeding up and the agent was breaking into a full run to make it onto the limo.

67 posted on 11/22/2003 7:42:33 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Burn24
She was grabbing the hand of a secret service officer and trying to pull him into the car.
68 posted on 11/22/2003 7:44:22 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Henchman
Nice thread. Most of the replies have been civil and respectful. Regardless of JFK having been a Dem, he was nevertheless, the President of the United States of America. His assassination was a despicable thing and a blow to the honor of the nation. Jackie O was a perfect First Lady in my opinion.

I agree; she was a hard act to follow and in my opinion, nobody has come close to matching her for style, class, and grace...though Pat Nixon's determination to remain dignified as her husband's presidency disintegrated was impressive.

It's horrifying anytime an elected leader is stolen from the public by an assassin, no matter what party he's from.

69 posted on 11/22/2003 7:45:46 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
I may be the only Freeper to have met both John Kennedy, Jr. and Lee Oswald's daughter.

It's entirely possible!

70 posted on 11/22/2003 7:47:47 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: South40
I doubt she was blaming the country.

I think people are reading way too much into her use of the word "they."

71 posted on 11/22/2003 7:50:18 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: strictlyaminorleaguer
Not to gross anyone out here, but I remember reading that Jackie climbed onto the trunk to retrieve a portion of her husband's skull. If I'm recalling correctly, she said she was acting on autopilot and not thinking of her safety, but only trying to help her husband. I can't even imagine the trauma she suffered that day. I don't remember JFK's assassination (only 3 at the time), but I do remember how devastated my mother was at Bobby's in 1968. It was a different era.

I've always been told she was giving a secret service agent a hand onto the limo; the photos and films seem to support this.

72 posted on 11/22/2003 7:51:41 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
I always believed that she married him because he was so rich and she thought he could protect her and her kids. By marrying him, she got the kids out of the country and away from all the other Kennedy kids.

Now that you mention it, I'd heard rumblings about that myself...that she didn't really like the Kennedy clan as a whole and didn't want her kids hanging out with them. Can't say she succeeded with JFK Jr., but she did a bang-up job with Caroline.

73 posted on 11/22/2003 7:53:40 AM PST by Pedantic_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: halfdome
I've always thought it looked like she was trying to get away too and nobody should judge her. Part of JFK's head was blown off and I've always thought it horrified her to see him that way and she was trying to get away. I also think she was trying to get to the secret service guys for protection.
74 posted on 11/22/2003 8:01:21 AM PST by gingerky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: South40
I was 7 and it was announced over the PA system at school...my teacher broke down---others heard crying in the hallways. Watched the funeral procession at my grandmothers house and those images are burned in.
Those were weird times: Air Raid Drills (hit the floor/get under the desk)--having to be drilled for the locations of all the local fallout shelters--announcements that "sometime today an aircraft will be breaking the sound barrier nearby"..(and sometimes not announced: crack-BOOM)

75 posted on 11/22/2003 8:19:35 AM PST by two23 (---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South40
I remember hearing a quote. When asked if she wanted to change clothes she said no...let them see what they have done. Who was "they"?

For an answer -- and an indication of what the Kennedys thought about the assassination -- read Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK (partly based on the investigation Daniel Patrick Moynihan did of the assassination for RFK).

76 posted on 11/22/2003 8:28:44 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls; mikegi
I think she was tring to climb out of the car to get away.

Didn't John Connally say out loud, "They're going to kill us all"? I assume Jackie would have heard that.

77 posted on 11/22/2003 8:34:14 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
However, I can only see two shots when supposedly three were fired. Do you know when
the third shot was supposedly fired? Was it before or after the two clear shots (or in between)?


As much as I hate to admit it, PBS's "FrontLine" show had a pretty good
recounting of Oswald's meandering life and appointment with destiny in Dallas.

FrontLine showed some digital recreations from Failure Analysis (which do court-room
recreations of crime scenes).

This presentaion included a "sniper's-eye view" from the sixth floor of the book depository.
Their scenario claims 3 shots in 8 seconds.
Shot #1 was a miss.
Shot #2 was the JFK throat shot, with the slowed bullet then hitting Connelly in the back,
then exiting Connelly and hitting his arm.
Shot #3 was the devastating head-shot to JFK.

I hadn't seen/heard him before, but a school depository worker who was on the fifth
floor directly under Oswald's "sniper nest" said he heard the three shots and could
even hear the cycling of the bolt action of the rifle.

The documentary was pretty good, included some of the conspiracy theories, and admitted
that there were they simply could not account for some of the time Oswald spent in New Orleans,
where he might have had involvement with The Mob, anti-Castro Cuban expatriates,
or right-wing fringe elements.
There may have been a conspiracy, but if so, it's probably something we'll not
know the details about in this life.
78 posted on 11/22/2003 8:50:24 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gingerky
I've always thought it looked like she was trying to get away too and nobody should judge her.

Amen to that.
I've done enough hunting and seen enough gore while working in hospitals...
and I still cringe (and sometimes turn away) when the Zapruder film is shown.
I can imagine plenty of tough guys freaking out in that sort of situation...
79 posted on 11/22/2003 8:53:07 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
Yes, security was not as streamlined as it is today.

1. JFK refused to have the "security bubble" on the convertible. I don't know
how much it would have helped, but reflections might have made it tougher for
a sniper to make a good shot.

2. And I think I've heard that some of JFK's security detail hit the bars a bit
harder than was prudent the night of Nov. 21 and into some of the wee hours of Nov. 22.
(Of course, that may or may not have had any influence on the outcome.)
80 posted on 11/22/2003 8:56:12 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson