Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
that the blood on his shirt was "smears" and plainly visible to the naked eye.

Are you sure of that, because, and I could be wrong, I thought the lab found the blood.

127 posted on 11/21/2003 1:19:42 PM PST by Strider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Strider; Howlin
I thought the lab found the blood.

I am positive. I'll find the transcript later when I have a chance, but the idea was given out because the detective said Bryant had the shirt tucked in, then when the shirt was handed over he didn't examine it, just put it in a bag and delivered to evidence where the lab then got it. The detective said at a later time he did in fact observe the smears.

I didn't say "so much" blood, I said "as much a she did" in order to leave smears. I didn't claim it was gallons or deviate at all from what is a known fact. She bled enough to leave smears on his shirt is all I said, and I, for one, do not find that normal or usual, on its face. I'll wait for more testimony to persuade me it's more common than I think.

167 posted on 11/21/2003 1:38:01 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson