I am positive. I'll find the transcript later when I have a chance, but the idea was given out because the detective said Bryant had the shirt tucked in, then when the shirt was handed over he didn't examine it, just put it in a bag and delivered to evidence where the lab then got it. The detective said at a later time he did in fact observe the smears.
I didn't say "so much" blood, I said "as much a she did" in order to leave smears. I didn't claim it was gallons or deviate at all from what is a known fact. She bled enough to leave smears on his shirt is all I said, and I, for one, do not find that normal or usual, on its face. I'll wait for more testimony to persuade me it's more common than I think.
Thanks. I really appreciat that.
There is absolutely NO testimony about how much blood was seen in her underwear; NONE; it was testified to as "what appeared to be blood," nothing more. So "as much as" doesn't mean anything either!
It does not say anywhere in the judge's ruling that he didn't see it; it says it was found by the lab, period. And it wasn't described as "streaks" and the size was NOT discussed. And the lab said it was a transfer from another source.
The really cheesy part of the detective's testimony was that it wasn't until Mackey crossed him that he admitted that he didn't actually SEE it until the lab showed it to him UNDER A MICROSCOPE.