And the record shows (I'm not claiming firsthand knowledge--just the record) that the blood on his shirt was "smears" and plainly visible to the naked eye. No, the officer who collected it did not see it when he took it as he said Bryant had the shirt tucked in and when he was given the shirt he put it in a bag and delivered it to evidence, then later observed the smears with his own eyes. I say bleeding that results in smears is more than normal bleeding.
I don't think that was the testimony; how about a link to that.
I say bleeding that results in smears is more than normal bleeding.
Well, that is what you say; but that's not what the testimony has been; not one person said "so much blood."
Are you sure of that, because, and I could be wrong, I thought the lab found the blood.
Sorry, that is inaccurate and misleading.
If that is your understanding, it might be a good idea to refresh your memory by reading the transcript again. Assuming you have read the entire transcript.
Yes, the detective said the Nike T-shirt was tucked in when he first met KB. However, the blood was not even visible to the detective when KB handed over the shirt. It seems the very small amount of blood is on the inside of the shirt only, near the hem and it is barely detectable.