[Smogger]

Phreebass called it. The #1 reason for false accusation of rape: the accuser makes the accusation to conceal consentual sex from a boyfriend/parent. Well there you have it folks. You have already read accounts that the bellboy was following the Kobe and the accuser around the hotel as she gave Kobe a tour of the facility. Phreebass rightly surmised that his romantic interest would put the moves on the Kobester. Obviously, the bellboy was anxious when his romantic interest disappeared into Kobe's room for 20 minutes. Unforutnately, the alleged victim decided to put his mind at ease that nothing consentual took place with a false allegation of rape. Sickening.

[Smogger]

[Smogger]

ping.

what a suprise.

[Orangedog]

My, she does get around, doesn't she.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

My, oh, my. Kobe is the luckiest son of a gun around!

This girl's mother must want to KILL her, now!

[StolarStorm]

Geeez.... I'm starting to wonder if this girl was the hotel call girl.

[ex-Texan]

*BUMP*!

[End Times Sentinel]

Well, there's no less impeachable source than The Globe!

Hey Smogger, what's the skinny on Art Carney's touching last words?

 

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

 

[WackyKat]

The #1 reason for false accusation of rape: the accuser makes the accusation to conceal consentual sex from a boyfriend/parent. Well there you have it folks.

Get real. She's 19 years old. Why would she have to "conceal" anything, and how would a false rape accusation "conceal" it?

I can see the Bryant camp's victim smear campaign is having its desired effect.

[KantianBurke]

Pietrack, a 23-year-old bellhop at the resort where the alleged rape took place, is the first person Katelyn Faber told about her encounter with Bryant.

Per Jim Robsinson's rules - no naming the defendant. Please pull this thread.

[Smogger]

Thanks for restoring the original thread.

Thanks for valuing free speech.

[PBRSTREETGANG]

Bear in mind that this is The Globe.

[cyncooper]

I just read your locked thread and had a reply all typed and it got pulled, then put back, then locked!

First, even the prosecutors said the underwear evidence belonged to either one of two guys. This indicates she informed them of this information and most of us following the case guessed the bellman was one guy she'd been with.

You queried on the other thread how this guy can be a witness. Because the finding of her blood on Bryant's shirt happens to back up her story, in addition to a he said/she said. And if in fact events transpired exactly as she said, and the bellman did in fact hear the story from her that night and so on, how can he not testify.

Still haven't called Bryant a rapist, but "revelations" like this that are really not new news and don't demonstrate Bryant's innocence do not lead me to think he is. Innocent, that is. Also note that it does show Mackey's "three day" question was cleverly devised to imply 3 consecutive days when she knew it was not. Despite what others have accused me of, I do not begrudge Mackey using defense lawyer tactics to present a deceitful presentation of facts. It's what defense lawyers do. I always wonder why someone deviates from the strict truth to skew it, though,and it does not cause me to think it's because they have nothing to hide.

[rdb3]

It used to be that I'd totally ignore the Globe or the Enquirer. Not anymore after the Je$$e story broke.

This is a trip.

[Lee Heggy]

A guy named 'Pietrack' and a woman with the same name as the college in Animal House...? This is getting too wierd.

[Yaelle]

This "witness" will not prove to be a good one. They may choose not to call him to the stand. Now, is it HIS semen in her panties? Or yet another man's?

I still cannot believe that the D.A. would choose to go ahead with a case like this. I also can't believe she, after being warned of the dangers of falsely crying rape, would go forward with it, either. This can't be good for her reputation (but perhaps better for her reputation than being dead, as she attemtped to become twice in the past year). There is no understanding some people.

[marajade]

So what if she did. That doesn't negate the fact that he might have raped her.

I don't see you applying the same standard to Kobe Bryant, i.e., was he celibate one week before he was accused?

[Uncle Hal]

I heard an interview on one of the cable news networks about a month ago with a guy that worked with the accuser. I am not sure if is the guy referred to in this article. The guy was a terrible interview and said virtually nothing. One thing I do remember is that the host asked him how long he had personally known the accuser and he answered he did not have a personal relationship with the accused and that he only knew her at work. I thought at the time that it was a strange reply. Did anyone else see this? I believe it was on the MSNBC show at 6 pm pst. I cannot remember the hosts name.

[zarf]

As I predicted. Another slut, another day.

[judywillow]

If I were Bryant, the DA in this case would be looking at the mother of all lawsuits.

[Servant of the 9]

I know two women who were raped and both have said that what struck them most forcefully was the wacky dialog the girl reported from Kobe during and after.
They said they were both spoken to that way, as though the rapist was trying to convince her and himself that it wasn't rape, even as he punched them.

In the meantime, someone needs to tell this young lady the rule about always wearing clean underwear.

Her promiscuity is not at all unusual in girls her age today, nor would it have been in the '60s or any time in between.
Being promiscious does not mean she can't be raped.

So9