To: Smogger
This "witness" will not prove to be a good one. They may choose not to call him to the stand. Now, is it HIS semen in her panties? Or yet another man's?
I still cannot believe that the D.A. would choose to go ahead with a case like this. I also can't believe she, after being warned of the dangers of falsely crying rape, would go forward with it, either. This can't be good for her reputation (but perhaps better for her reputation than being dead, as she attemtped to become twice in the past year). There is no understanding some people.
60 posted on
11/21/2003 12:51:03 PM PST by
Yaelle
To: Yaelle
Now, is it HIS semen in her panties? Or yet another man's? That sound you hear is my mind BOGGLING..........LOL.
And I cannot believe the DA went with this case either; if he knew all this and still went ahead, lord help him.
66 posted on
11/21/2003 12:54:45 PM PST by
Howlin
To: Yaelle
Now, is it HIS semen in her panties? Or yet another man's? They've never tested it, have they? Enquiring minds want to know!
67 posted on
11/21/2003 12:55:02 PM PST by
Lijahsbubbe
(Take my advice; I don't use it anyway.)
To: Yaelle
"They may choose not to call him to the stand. Now, is it HIS semen in her panties?"
Maybe she mistakenly put on her momma's panties that day. ;^)
113 posted on
11/21/2003 1:16:35 PM PST by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
To: Yaelle
This "witness" will not prove to be a good one. They may choose not to call him to the stand. Now, is it HIS semen in her panties? Or yet another man's? I don't know, but what we DO know is that TWO men refused to submit DNA evidence to the police and NEITHER of them was Kobe Bryant.
179 posted on
11/21/2003 1:42:47 PM PST by
Smogger
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson