Skip to comments.
Bombshell: Kobe Accuser Had Sex with Key Witness
The Globe ^
| 11/20/03
| Globe
Posted on 11/21/2003 11:44:43 AM PST by Smogger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 641-656 next last
To: TheOtherOne
I'm getting ALL my work done and I'll be waiting come January 1st........LOL.
381
posted on
11/21/2003 4:20:50 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Smogger
Or her and the bellhop came up with a plan to get a LOT of money out of Kobe?
382
posted on
11/21/2003 4:22:46 PM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: F.J. Mitchell
Since you obviously haven't been following the case allow me to englighten you.
1) She was not sodomized. Early reports that she was were erroneous.
2) Detective Winters who interviewed the alleged witness testified that the victim did not say no. In fact he wrote down in his notes to follow up with the victim as to why she did not say no.
383
posted on
11/21/2003 4:23:44 PM PST
by
Smogger
To: cyncooper
It doesn't say they didn't use a microscope.....and it sure as hell doesn't say it was visible to the naked eye.
384
posted on
11/21/2003 4:24:29 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I know you are right! The person who wrote this broad, sweeping consequence/test, in this law, should have to under go it also!!
To: F.J. Mitchell
You need to catch up; no testimony of sodomy.
And she was able to say plenty other stuff, why not no?
386
posted on
11/21/2003 4:25:14 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: woodyinscc
As you and I have discussed before, if I had a son, I'd tell him to avoid Colorado at all cost.
Their rape laws are draconian, to say the least!
Imagine a 24 (?) year old man NOT getting an erection while watching women have sex!
387
posted on
11/21/2003 4:26:54 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: af_vet_1981
And the worst part of it is, that they probably weren't making idle threats.
388
posted on
11/21/2003 4:27:26 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(If you can't laugh at yourself, we'll do it for you-no problem.)
To: dirtboy
I am only referring to the characterization of the girl as compared to the characterization of Kobe.
She's a slut and he's..........
389
posted on
11/21/2003 4:35:24 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: Howlin
Howlin,
So nice to see you again. Still in MI?
390
posted on
11/21/2003 4:43:38 PM PST
by
playball0
(Fortune favors the bold)
To: playball0
Never been to MI! I'm in NC.
391
posted on
11/21/2003 4:45:18 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
What other stuff was she able to say during the time in Kobe's room? I hadn't heard.
I do know from experience that a person can so scared they cannot utter a single word to save their own life.
The summer I was sixteen, a couple of buddies and myself were swimming in a private pool owned by one's uncle, no one was there but us. I thought I was a pretty good swimmer and thought I had reached shallow enough water to put my feet down and stand up.Wrong! The water was still over my head and there was moss on the slope of the pool where I put my feet down. I couldn't kick off enough to suface enough to start swimming, couldn't get my feet up, completely forgot everything I knew about swimming, got busy drowning.
Every time I came up I could see mu buddies at the other end of the pool, shooting the breeze, they saw me but I couldn't yell help! or anything else, so they thought I was just fooling around.
I went down, swallowed water and came up, there they were but they thought I was playing. I don't know how many times I went down and came up, I just know that the next to the last time when I popped up, I was stil mute and they still thought I was kidding as I submerged again. I must have been down long enough that time to convince them that I was really drowning, because my good buddy was holding onto the edge of the pool and reaching out for me when I came up, and pulled me in.
Believe me, you can be too scared to utter a sound.
She may be guilty as charged of being a gold digger-he may be guilty as charged of feeling that he is above the law. I do not know either of these people. He has fans, he has wealth, he has power-she has none of those. I am on her side until I am proved wrong.
392
posted on
11/21/2003 4:54:11 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(If you can't laugh at yourself, we'll do it for you-no problem.)
To: Smogger
So by your argument a man is a victim of a crime ... his wife is the only witness.. his wife is no longer redible? Please, this is all apologist BS.
393
posted on
11/21/2003 4:57:02 PM PST
by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: cyncooper
"And the record shows (I'm not claiming firsthand knowledge--just the record) that the blood on his shirt was "smears" and plainly visible to the naked eye. No, the officer who collected it did not see it when he took it as he said Bryant had the shirt tucked in and when he was given the shirt he put it in a bag and delivered it to evidence, then later observed the smears with his own eyes. I say bleeding that results in smears is more than normal bleeding"
Sorry, that is inaccurate and misleading.
If that is your understanding, it might be a good idea to refresh your memory by reading the transcript again. Assuming you have read the entire transcript.
Yes, the detective said the Nike T-shirt was tucked in when he first met KB. However, the blood was not even visible to the detective when KB handed over the shirt. It seems the very small amount of blood is on the inside of the shirt only, near the hem and it is barely detectable.
394
posted on
11/21/2003 4:57:11 PM PST
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: Howlin
Not to be crass, but if there was lots of blood it could be that she "had the painters in".
395
posted on
11/21/2003 4:59:05 PM PST
by
trussell
(Prayer Works!!)
To: playball0; Howlin; xsmommy
#354 is excellent --- thanks for alerting xs and me.
396
posted on
11/21/2003 4:59:39 PM PST
by
onyx
To: F.J. Mitchell
A trial is supposed to be a search for truth and we all are rooting for truth to prevail.
Indeed...the more they attack the girl the more I want to defend her. They are the same mental midgets who applauded O. Simpson non-guilty verdict.
397
posted on
11/21/2003 4:59:40 PM PST
by
Chantal
To: Chantal
Exactly! That is why I am siding with her.
398
posted on
11/21/2003 5:01:52 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(If you can't laugh at yourself, we'll do it for you-no problem.)
To: F.J. Mitchell
I read you.... Kobe made the decision for her. It's hard to leave when someone is holding a hand around your throat.
399
posted on
11/21/2003 5:06:50 PM PST
by
Chantal
To: StolarStorm
However, a nut and a slut can still be a rape victim.No doubt about that.
But, when the social interaction between man and woman is a prelude to sex, then rape is difficult to prove, because the charge may truly be false. This woman has, IMHO, demonstrated she is a slut and also 'possessed' by a personality disorder (e.g., a "nut".) The data regarding her behavior clearly show she is virtually sexually promiscuous as is humanly possible and also that she is mentally unstable.
His lawyers will point out that whatever sex their client and this plaintiff had that night, it most certainly wasn't rape.
400
posted on
11/21/2003 5:08:06 PM PST
by
Rudder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 641-656 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson