As far as I can tell, you have no capacity to recognize truth.
I have an idea why don't you point out some of the inconsistencies in the article instead of simply saying "This story sucks because I am a liberal and I don't agree with it."
And the "Kennedy was a man and all men are mortal" cop-out does not count. The author accepts the flaws of other presidents. His completely accurate point is that, lacking a more deserving icon, liberals have built up Kennedy to be something he was not. And it irritates the hell out of you. Good.