I have an idea why don't you point out some of the inconsistencies in the article instead of simply saying "This story sucks because I am a liberal and I don't agree with it."
And the "Kennedy was a man and all men are mortal" cop-out does not count. The author accepts the flaws of other presidents. His completely accurate point is that, lacking a more deserving icon, liberals have built up Kennedy to be something he was not. And it irritates the hell out of you. Good.
And it irritates the hell out of you
What irritates the hell out of me is your demonstrated inability to reason.