Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Evidence in JFK Assassination Compels LBJ Attorney Barr McClellan To Demand Release of Documents
biz.yahoo.com ^ | Monday November 17, 3:35 pm ET | PRNewswire

Posted on 11/19/2003 8:34:56 PM PST by Destro

Press Release

Source: Hannover House

New Evidence in J.F.K. Assassination Compels L.B.J. Attorney, Barr McClellan, To Demand Release of Documents

Monday November 17, 3:35 pm ET

McClellan, Former Attorney for Lyndon Baines Johnson, Petitions Support Of Senate Judiciary Committee and Department of Justice to Investigate New Evidence and to Release All Documents in J.F.K. Assassination Case

WASHINGTON, Nov. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Barr McClellan, an attorney who worked closely with former President Lyndon Baines Johnson, has asked for the support of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Department of Justice to investigate new evidence of L.B.J.'s involvement in the J.F.K. assassination. McClellan has also asked for the release of hundreds of documents that were withheld by the C.I.A. and F.B.I. from a 1998 investigation conducted by the Assassination Records Review Board.

"The American public has waited forty years to hear the truth about the J.F.K. assassination," said McClellan. "For government agencies to withhold critical evidence and not cooperate with the AARB investigation is a form of obstruction of justice. Under the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, the public should be granted access to these documents."

According to McClellan and former AARB investigator Doug Horne, hundreds of relevant documents were withheld from the 1998 investigation into the J.F.K. Assassination. They believe that these materials are now in the possession of the National Archives, relocated from sealed files previously controlled by the C.I.A. and F.B.I. Additionally, McClellan has suggested a formal review of the evidence in his book, "Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K." which clearly shows a direct connection between L.B.J. and the individual involved with the assassination and cover-up.

"At this time we need to see what else is missing and what else would be helpful to presenting the entire truth," McClellan continued. "The Senate Judiciary Committee and the Department of Justice could make the request of the National Archives and should do so."

A press conference is scheduled for Tuesday, November 18, at which time McClellan will make a more specific request for document production, and will detail support for this cause from diverse and highly placed sources. The public and media are invited to attend this special conference at the National Press Club, in Washington, D.C. at 3:00 p.m. EST. "Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K." by Barr McClellan was released last month by Hannover House. 464 pages, $24.95 sugg. retail, ISBN 0-9637846-2-5. NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045

Digital images of ASSASSINATION EVIDENCE graphics are downloadable at: www.BarrMcClellan.com

Images of BOOK JACKET and AUTHOR also posted on website and accessible.

PRESS / NEWS MEDIA ARE GRANTED AUTHORIZATION TO REPRINT IMAGES FROM WEBSITE


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; jfk; jfkassassination; kennedyassassination; lbj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last
To: rightofrush
fedgov shills (sinkspur) don't have to think, they have handlers.
161 posted on 01/03/2004 2:54:46 PM PST by ChefKeith (NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ChefKeith; sinkspur; rightofrush
fedgov shill is right. He has trouble now knowing that the gov. indicted Johnson for murder. That he did not hear about such an indictement by a grand jury puzzles him because he assumes the govt would have told him of such a murder indictment. If the govt did not comment then it must not have happened.
162 posted on 01/03/2004 2:58:02 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: elli1
"McClellan's bio said he represented LBJ interests from 66-71. Incidentally, Scott McClellan (Ari's replacement) is his son."

"McClellan" is my maiden name. Small world...

163 posted on 01/03/2004 2:59:05 PM PST by redhead (Les Français sont des singes de capitulation qui mangent du fromage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
"Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K." which clearly shows a direct connection between L.B.J. and the individual involved with the assassination and cover-up.
Jeez, here we go again. Hasn't this thing been beaten to death already? That book isn't worth lining a bird cage.

Still curious,have you read it?
164 posted on 01/03/2004 3:01:28 PM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You're wrong. The second assasin was the smoking man from the storm drain. He also shot MLK. I saw it on X-Files.
165 posted on 01/03/2004 3:09:04 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grizzfan
You seen this thread? or the book?
166 posted on 01/03/2004 3:51:46 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shootergrassyknoll
If you haven't read Barr McClellan's book, do so. His book is the only book I've read that links all the people in Texas that you've read about in other books. LBJ had no knowledge of the assassination, per say, he was the reason JFK was assassinated. Edward Clark was LBJ's Lawyer and protector! Clark was a powerful man in Texas, Owned allot of politicians, judges etc. Thats why it had to take place in Texas, so he could handle any damage control after the assassination. There was only three people who knew about the JFK assassination in advance, Edward Clark, Mac Wallace and the man named Sonny, the last two were assassins and they knew only shortly before the act. Oswald was recruited as a pasty, he was involved but was to be shot to death in a shoot out with the cops, that didn't happen. The book makes the most sense of anything I've read, read and you be the judge, believe me, it beats the Warren report!

Yeah, it makes perfect sense. Everyone involved in the assassination knew each other or were connected by a few degrees of separation. From Ruby to the property owners to LBJ to...everyone.

167 posted on 01/03/2004 4:08:48 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Never heard of it.

Why do you comment on things you know nothing about? You just enjoy throwing your stinkbombs.

168 posted on 01/03/2004 4:09:58 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
You seen this thread? or the book?

Oh, my goodness, no. Thanks for the ping.

169 posted on 01/03/2004 4:25:27 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Did you read post # 63?
170 posted on 01/03/2004 5:26:14 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Why do you comment on things you know nothing about?

I know about the Kennedy assassination; I didn't know about this wild-ass theory that Destro and McClellan have about some unheard-of guy killing Kennedy at Johnson's behest.

You comment on things you know nothing about....the Kobe Bryant case, for instance.

171 posted on 01/03/2004 5:45:28 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Destro
He has trouble now knowing that the gov. indicted Johnson for murder.

Can't indict dead men.

Why don't you drop it, Destro, and go back to arguing Orthodoxy? You don't look like a kook when you're discussing religion.

172 posted on 01/03/2004 5:48:16 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Here ya go:

The Gonzo Science Files: JFK Assassination: The Shooters

Written By: Jim Richardson and Allen Richardson
Posted: 3/9/2003

More of our interview with JFK assassination researcher Dr. Jim Fetzer. In this installment, Dr. Fetzer names some of those who may have been the actual gunmen.

Gonzo Science: So who were the shooters? Do you have names?

Fetzer: Well, they’re multiple ... (infamous mafia member) Johnny Rosselli claimed to have been one of them.

Gonzo Science: Do you think he’s credible?

Fetzer: Oh, Rosselli’s a pretty credible guy.

There’s quite a few candidates (for shooters).

The shooter on top of the County Records building may have been a deputy sheriff by the name of Harry Weatherford.

The guy who was in the Dal-Tex building may have been a guy named Eugene Brading, also known as Jim Braden. He might also have been this guy Chuckie Nicoletti. Nicoletti may also have been in the Dal-Tex building.

I believe the shooter in the Book Depository may have been a Cuban.

Why they were shooting (Texas Governor) Connally has not been obvious, but the fact that he was hit, you know, I don’t see it as just a miss, in particular if he was hit two or three times. … But I now believe you are right to suggest to me that the person who was supposed to be sitting in that seat was Ralph Yarborough, LBJ’s liberal political enemy, which explains not only why they were shooting at him but also why LBJ put up such a huge fuss over who should ride with JFK. When Jack insisted that the Chief Executive of the state should ride with the Chief Executive of the United States that morning, it must have been too late to change the arrangements that were in place. I am in debt to you, Jim, for this observation, which is simply brilliant!

Other shooters - one of the most distant, who fired through the windshield, the toughest shot - it looks like the best speculation would be Malcolm “Mac” Wallace. This was a very wonderful marksman, who apparently had killed other people for Lyndon Johnson.

Madeline Duncan Brown, Lyndon’s mistress, by whom he had a son, was a trap and game shooter. She used to go out to the local skeet club. She said the two weeks before the assassination she was out there and Mac Wallace was there almost every day and that he never missed anything he aimed at - he was really good! And she suspected - her conjecture was - that Mac Wallace was one of the shooters.

Charles Harrelson was there. Harrelson is serving a life sentence for the assassination of a federal judge with a high-powered rifle, having killed “Maximum John” Woods.

Gonzo Science: (Harrelson) is (actor) Woody’s dad, right?

Fetzer: Yeah, Woody’s dad. He was hired by a couple of drug dealers who were about to be sentenced and who didn’t want to be sent up for life. And he actually said …

Gonzo Science: He confessed.

Fetzer: Yeah, he said that he killed Jack, by which I interpret he meant he fired the shot that entered the right temple. Now, he was subsequently put on video, and he admitted that he said it, but said he was out of his mind at the time, and the very fact that he said it showed that he was out of his mind … isn’t that a clever thing to say?

One thing I’ve been struck by the people who’ve been involved in this thing is that most of them are highly intelligent. This guy, Woody’s dad, Charles ñ very intelligent guy. He also went on to add that the “agency” - his word - that was responsible for this would never let it be known who was involved, see? So he’s trying to step out of the noose, right? Step out of the noose. He may well have been one of the shooters.

But I mean, Rosselli approached Joe Bananno in a prison where Rosselli (and Bananno were) incarcerated. … This is a story coming from Bananno’s son, Bill Bananno, who said he had no reason to disbelieve Johnny, who had been one of the shooters in the St. Valentine’s Day massacre - on a radio talk show they’re talking about this - and how Rosselli was complaining to these other members of the mob how he’d been left out to dry in Dallas; that after he’d done the shooting, that there was no one there to help him get away; and that he had to walk a long time in the sewer to get to this area where he would be picked up. And in fact that’s how some of the shooters escaped - they went through the sewer and then were picked up by a small private plane and flown out, in a dry river bed -

Gonzo Science: Did David Ferrie do the flying?

Fetzer: Ferrie might have been someone who was going to, but in fact Didn’t actually. I mean, he would be a, you know, backup - Ferrie knew a lot about this. He might have been an alternative escape. That was kind of the reason why, I think, he was standing by this ice rink telephone (in Houston, as chronicled in The Man on the Grassy Knoll): he was supposed to fly in and bring somebody out. But I think in the end they didn’t need him - like that. I think Ferrie was definitely involved in the plot.

You can find this riveting interview at Paranormal News.

Des, my head is spinning. If Wallace shot through the windshield, from the front, how is a print of his found on the 6th floor the School Book Depository?

He can't bi-locate, can he?

173 posted on 01/03/2004 5:59:46 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Why does that source have any bearing on Barr's finger print evidence linking Wallace to the 6th floor?

As for the indictment. You are right it was not technically an indictment.

THE ESTES DOCUMENTS

In 1961, Henry Marshall was found shot to death on his remote Texas farm. He had been shot five times with a .22 caliber rifle and, since the rifle was lying beside his body, the coroner had no problem coming up with the probable scenario: Suicide. The only problem was the type of rifle - it was a bolt-action, and in non-shooter lay man's terms, this simply meant that Marshall would had to have manually worked the bolt four times (up, back, forward, down, fire - up, back, forward, down, fire, etc.) in order to shoot himself. At the same time he would have had to turn the rifle around at an awkward angle, pointing it into his side, stretching his arm and squeezing off each shot with his thumb. Five times. In addition to the obvious difficulties for a man to have committed suicide in this fashion, were the outcries of Marshall's family, who fervently disagreed with the suicide verdict. There appeared to be no good reason for Marshall, a successful farmer, with money in the bank and a solid record with his employer, the U. S. Department of Agriculture, to have committed suicide. But despite the strange appearance of things, the cause of death was officially listed as suicide by gunshot.

Things started to change a few months later when Secretary of Agriculture, Orville Freeman, released information pertaining to an investigation that Marshall had been participating in at the time of his death.

Billie Sol Estes, now known as the Texas wheeler-dealer and con-man supreme was, in 1961, at the peak of his agricultural career. He had become a multimillionaire and a virtual icon in Pecos, Texas. His success was due, in great part, by his solid connections in government - and one of his primary connections was Vice President Lyndon Johnson. Things started to fall apart when Estes' cotton allotment scheme began to be scrutinized by Agriculture officials. Estes had master minded a bizarre method of having the government transfer other farmer's cotton allotments to his own cotton acreage. In this way all of his land could be used to grow the tightly regulated crop. Such a scheme would have been impossible without help from high officials, either inside the U.S.D.A., or Washington, or both. Henry Marshall, in reviewing the cotton allotment irregularities connected with Billy Sol Estes, evidently uncovered a warm path that led to Vice President Johnson, but also to his own untimely death.

Billie Sol went to trial and then prison, never once breathing the name of Lyndon Johnson - until his release in 1984. A Texas Ranger, Clint Peoples, had befriended Estes and convinced him that he should come clean with the whole truth. True to his word, Estes agreed to appear before a Robertson County grand jury and clear the record concerning the cotton allotments, the death of Henry Marshall and the involvement of LBJ and others.

He recounted the whole ugly picture - from the millions he had funnelled into Johnson's secret slush fund, to the illegal cotton allotment scheme, to the murder of Henry Marshall. Estes testified that Lyndon Johnson, Cliff Carter, Malcolm Wallace and himself met several times to discuss the issue of the "loose cannon" - Henry Marshall. Marshall had refused a LBJ-arranged promotion to Washington headquarters, and it was feared that he was about to talk. Johnson, according to Estes finally said, "Get rid of him," and Malcolm "Mac" Wallace was given the assignment. According to testimony, Wallace followed Marshall to a remote area of his farm and beat him nearly unconscious. Then while trying to asphyxiate him with exhaust from Marshall's pickup truck, Wallace thought he heard someone approaching the scene, and hastily grabbed a rifle which customarily rested in the window rack of the truck. Quickly pumping five shots into Marshall's body, Wallace fled the scene. Suicide.

That 1984 grand jury testimony accomplished only one official action. Marshall's death certificate was finally changed to read: "Cause of death - murder by gunshot." All of the guilty participants were dead - Johnson, Carter and Wallace. The only one left was Estes, and the U. S. Justice Department, getting wind of the Robertson grand jury testimony, wanted to talk to him.

174 posted on 01/03/2004 9:58:24 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
"Who is Dr. Cyril Wecht??

Dr. Wecht is one of very few forensic pathologists in this country. He is from Pittsburgh but travels the country on cases.

His original take on the Kennedy shooting was supportive of the single bullet theory. However, during the last 10 years he has done a 100% turn around and supports another bullet theory. Problem is he won't discuss the "new evidence" that changed his mind.

175 posted on 01/04/2004 10:31:53 AM PST by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: grizzfan
Yes I did. I don't think there is any Texas connection between Bush and LBJ. McClellan is just someone who wants to get his story (as he knows it) out.

LBJ's Historian, Robert Caro, says he has one more book to do on him that will cover the presidential years. I'll be interested in Caro's take on McClellan's book.
176 posted on 01/04/2004 11:04:17 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
Wow!
177 posted on 01/04/2004 11:04:45 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I know about the Kennedy assassination; I didn't know about this wild-ass theory that Destro and McClellan have about some unheard-of guy killing Kennedy at Johnson's behest.

If you don't know the details then maybe you should learn them before you offer your strong opinion on it. This isn't some dude out on the edges of cyberspace, it's Johnson's personal attourney, an insider.

You comment on things you know nothing about....the Kobe Bryant case, for instance.

What don't I know about it it? I know as many details about that as you.

178 posted on 01/04/2004 4:24:34 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
This isn't some dude out on the edges of cyberspace, it's Johnson's personal attourney, an insider.

What is he, about 80?

He's on the edges of sanity, with this silly theory.

179 posted on 01/04/2004 4:44:07 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If you can't read and update yourself on the JFK assassination - at least have the decency to not insult other people as to their beliefs. It is very obvious to myself and others you haven't read anything in a long time - update yourself - then make your comments. I believe you stated you didn't want to read any other new books - believe me - that shows in your comments.

Further, it's pretty obvious the law cannot prosecute Johnson for the assassination - but life goes on - even with Johnson dead. If a United States court wants to determine he is guilty anyway I'm not going to close my eyes and ears to the new available information and continue to believe the Warren Report.

I get the impression that the last and only thing you've ever considered reading is the Warren Report. - why in God's name do you follow these threads then? Let other people talk amoungst themselves about the updated and accurate information. If you want to remain uninformed - fine! Do not bother the rest of us with your stubborn refusal to see things for what they really are.
180 posted on 01/04/2004 4:59:07 PM PST by LaurieB (It just goes to show you......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson