[Arkinsaw]

Now, now . . . Let's be fair . . . I didn't call anyone a crackpot.

My post was generically questioning calling him a crackpot on this thread. Honestly, I did not consider your specific comment as anything other than a question.

[LibWhacker]

Thanks. I do find the entire notion very interesting -- and very bizarre . . . A supernova collapsing back on itself and burning once again -- at least by all outward appearances -- as a normal star would. And to be in a stable state long enough for intelligent life to evolve on one of its inner planets, all maintained for the most part by the residual heat of the neutron star at its core. Can't say that isn't fascinating!