Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw
Thanks. I do find the entire notion very interesting -- and very bizarre . . . A supernova collapsing back on itself and burning once again -- at least by all outward appearances -- as a normal star would. And to be in a stable state long enough for intelligent life to evolve on one of its inner planets, all maintained for the most part by the residual heat of the neutron star at its core. Can't say that isn't fascinating!
38 posted on 11/19/2003 10:40:19 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
If it did supernova then where'd all its hydrogen come from?
44 posted on 11/19/2003 10:50:21 AM PST by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
A supernova collapsing back on itself and burning once again -- at least by all outward appearances -- as a normal star would. And to be in a stable state long enough for intelligent life to evolve on one of its inner planets, all maintained for the most part by the residual heat of the neutron star at its core.

That seems to summarize it. It's not the ordinary stellar history. And at what part of the sun is fusion happening? Presumably not in the iron core. If it's what we assume, hydrogen-into-helium fusion, how did all that hydrogen survive the supernova explosion and remain behind to ignite the burned-out remains of the nova?

48 posted on 11/19/2003 11:11:53 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson