Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terry Nichols' Judge OKs Elohim City Witnesses
Whoisjohndoe2.com, citing Associated Press ^ | 11/18/2003 | J.M. Berger

Posted on 11/19/2003 4:48:05 AM PST by JohnBerger

Defense lawyers will be allowed to call witnesses associated with the Elohim City white supremacist compound in the state murder trial of Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols, a judge ruled Tuesday.

Judge Steven Taylor rejected a prosecution motion to disallow 30 witnesses, including some federal government witnesses and various people associated with white supremacist groups and the Elohim City compound. Persistent allegations have tied Timothy McVeigh to Elohim City and other loosely affiliated white supremacist groups over the last several years.

A series of reports by Associated Press reporter John Solomon earlier this year said that the FBI failed to thoroughly investigate claims that McVeigh was tied to Elohim City, despite phone records and some eyewitness testimony suggesting a connection. Solomon also reported that federal prosecutors rejected a plea bargain offer which would have connected McVeigh to a white supremacist bank robbery gang operating in the West and Midwest before the bombing.

Prosecutors said they would appeal the judge's ruling.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: elohimcity; fredthompson; okcbombing; terrynichols; timothymcveigh
Next hearing is Dec. 1...
1 posted on 11/19/2003 4:48:06 AM PST by JohnBerger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *OKCbombing
Ping...
2 posted on 11/19/2003 4:49:42 AM PST by JohnBerger (http://www.whoisjohndoe2.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBerger
Is this going to open up the Arab connection again?
3 posted on 11/19/2003 4:50:49 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBerger
What does Nichols gain from having these witnesses called?
4 posted on 11/19/2003 4:50:57 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
Is this going to open up the Arab connection again?

I fail to see how that might tend to exonerate Nichols.

5 posted on 11/19/2003 4:51:30 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; LS
*** Is this going to open up the Arab connection again?
** I fail to see how that might tend to exonerate Nichols.

On the first point, not necessarily, except in that a proven connection to Elohim would almost certainly lead to an FBI inspector's general audit of the entire OKC case... Again.

On the second point, proving McVeigh was connected to a larger conspiracy does two things for Nichols.

One, it allows him to argue that some witness sightings were of someone else, like John Doe 2, instead of being Nichols.

Two, if McVeigh was part of a larger conspiracy, then Nichols can argue that he isn't culpable *enough* to be guilty of capital murder, and thus eligible for the death penalty, which is the whole point of this second trial.

Nichols successfully made Argument Two in his federal trial; not the conspiracy point, but that he wasn't guilty of first degree murder, which is why he hasn't already been executed.

In my opinion, none of the theories about wider conspiracies in OKC exonerates Nichols or McVeigh in the least. I see the occasional characterization of these guys as "patsies," as if that somehow excuses them from knowingly taking part in mass murder. It doesn't.

jmb
6 posted on 11/19/2003 5:09:54 AM PST by JohnBerger (http://www.whoisjohndoe2.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I wasn't suggesting it was. Many of the "conspiracy theorists," I think, have wrongly tried to exculpate both McVeigh and Nichols while (rightly) seeking to find out who else was involved. One does not exclude the other: I find it totally plausible that McVeigh and Nichols were idiot dupes who had some other help.
7 posted on 11/19/2003 5:37:24 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS
I agree with you, I have thought so from the very first day. My friends are husband/wife doctors in OKC. Justine is a radiologist and David is anesthesiologist there. David said the worst part about it was all the glass. The patients had so much glass stuck in their bodies that the doctors and nurses cut their hands on the patients. When I think of that, I get upset all over again.
8 posted on 11/19/2003 5:51:52 AM PST by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary? Me Neither!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnBerger
Thanks for the update. There is so much other important news lately, that this could easily be missed.
9 posted on 11/19/2003 6:35:37 AM PST by syriacus (In this world there's matter, antimatter, and ANTIFACT. Schumer is an expert on antifacts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBerger
How is it that Bush/Ashcroft could have been allowed to execute McVeigh BEFORE the trial of McVeigh's alleged accomplice?
10 posted on 11/19/2003 7:41:40 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
How is it that Bush/Ashcroft could have been allowed to execute McVeigh BEFORE the trial of McVeigh's alleged accomplice?

1. Nichols was tried on federal charges at the same time as McVeigh, and was convicted on most charges. He is now being tried on 165 charges of capital murder by the state of Oklahoma.

2. McVeigh was found guilty of a federal capital felony.

3. McVeigh waived his appeals shortly after Bush and Ashcroft took office.

There is no requirement to keep a scumbag alive any longer than his appellate process lasts.

11 posted on 11/19/2003 3:03:30 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
I would add to the above that the federal government was, and is, opposed to the state trial taking place, and they have not gone out of their way to accomodate the needs of the state prosecutors. In fact, quite the opposite, as previously reported:

http://angry.egoplex.com/2003_10_01_johndoearchive.html#106667379053048147

jmb
12 posted on 11/19/2003 3:23:48 PM PST by JohnBerger (http://www.whoisjohndoe2.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson