Replies

Oswald getting busted twice, let go the first time.

It's nearly impossible for that gun to crank out that many accurate shots at a moving target that quickly. That makes Oswald as the single shooter not a very simple explanation, let's not even get into the magic bullet, there is NO simple explanation for that going through that many supposed ricochetes and coming out pristine. Some of the counter explanations require dozens of people to be involved, but not all. It could simply be that Oswald had a compatriot, or two or three guys did it and set him up.

Part of the problem of course is that functionally there is no existing evidence. The body is gone, the autopsy was crap, the site investigation was pathetic. All we've really got for evidence is one amateur film and a few dozen amateur photos. That evidence says there's a definite maybe.

Have you read "CASE CLOSEED" by Posner? The Left really hates the guy for that book so I figure he is on to something.

I have done a lot of reading and watching of documentaries on this over the last few decades and I went from thinking there was a conspiracy to thinking that the most likely scenario is that Oswald did it acting alone.

That's just my opinion and I am certainly no expert. I just think at some point one must settle on a most likely scenario of events based on the existing evidence.

I believe that any conspiracy theory requires the active and passive participation of dozens, if not hundreds, of people. Just not likely in my view.

New technologies may emerge that can give a more definitive answer. Nothing is ever going to be 100% certain.

That's my two cents anyway.