Skip to comments.
Kennedy assassination solved!
Posted on 11/19/2003 1:33:19 AM PST by Az Joe
Oswald did it, alone. Now give it up!
Link below.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: assassination; kennedy; kennedyassassination
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-358 next last
To: Shooter 2.5
.
321
posted on
11/24/2003 11:38:20 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
I've found that to usually be the case, but what about the pristine bullet? No mark, no mushroom? Do AP bullets make small entry, large exit wounds?
322
posted on
11/24/2003 11:44:32 AM PST
by
ampat
(to)
To: Az Joe
And the reason for the sealed files?
323
posted on
11/24/2003 11:47:32 AM PST
by
ampat
(to)
To: ampat
It was an early 20th Century design for going through as many soldiers as possible or the equipment they were carrying.
The nose on the Second bullet was damaged and it was flattened. The lead was squeezed out of the exposed base like a toothpaste tube.
324
posted on
11/24/2003 12:05:47 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: ampat
Are there sealed files?
Do the sealed files have anything to do with the assassination?
How do you know that they do?
325
posted on
11/24/2003 1:21:15 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: Az Joe
I think LBJ had a heavy hand in the killing of JFK. Both men were lousy presidents.
As regards Kennedy:
John F. Kennedy (*). Charisma aside, the Bay of Pigs with JFK shrinking from use of air cover was the most reckless gaffe in foreign policy history, which his exemplary Cuban Missile Crisis negotiation didn't erase, leading to humiliation with Khrushchev, face-saving Vietnam buildup to show "manhood." But tax cut of $10 billion, puny by today's standards, spurred prosperity and is cited today by GOP supply-siders (but some Republicans opposed it then as "the biggest gamble in history").
326
posted on
11/24/2003 1:26:29 PM PST
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: JesseHousman
LBJ had a hand in killing Kennedy? Proof please.
327
posted on
11/24/2003 1:29:09 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: Az Joe
The sealed files are a fact. Why seal them?
328
posted on
11/24/2003 5:12:40 PM PST
by
ampat
(to)
To: Az Joe
On one of the documentaries last week, the Emergency Room physicians said that they did NOT have to make an incision for a tracheotomy in JFK's neck because there already was a hole there! (caused by a bullet?) They used that hole for the tracheotomy.
The Warren Commission said that the hole was caused by the ER doctors when they made an incision for a tracheotomy!
The ER doctors also said that they were asked by the Secret Service to CONSTRUCT an autopsy report from their best recollection on the following Monday.
Senator Specter was asked if the front neck wound was caused by a bullet, would that change his conclusion on the Warren Commisssion conclusions? He replied that the question was too SPECULATIVE!
To: ampat
The sealed files are a fact of what? Sealed files in and of themselves mean nothing and prove nothing.
330
posted on
11/24/2003 8:03:13 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: leprechaun9
There has never been a "perfect" invstigation of any crime, including the Kennedy assassination. That does not mean that there was a conspiracy.
331
posted on
11/24/2003 8:05:28 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: Az Joe
LBJ had a hand in killing Kennedy? Proof please.Lyndon Bird was a vicious, power hungry predator. He and Hitlery are a lot alike; albeit Hitlery smears a lot of frosting on her puffy face.
The expressions on Lyndon Bird's evil face subsequent to the assassination speak volumes.
I've read much of the life of this evil one and believe, although he didn't pull the trigger, he gave the go sign to his accomplices.
Any guy that would shake "Jumbo" in the faces of his staffers, sit on the toilet and call them in for conferences thereby relegating them to their positions as serfs, who would openly piss in the congressional parking lot in full view of secretaries (I could go on and on) would be the brains behind offing the one thing that stood between him and his miserable life's dream.
This man not only had no scruples he had absolutely no morals.
Of course, Johnson, Kennedy and Clinton had much in common in respect to moral turpitude, but with Johnson and Clinton I & II, there were insidious criminal minds constantly at work.
332
posted on
11/25/2003 5:54:48 AM PST
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: JesseHousman
Any guy that would shake "Jumbo" in the faces of his staffers, sit on the toilet and call them in for conferences thereby relegating them to their positions as serfs, who would openly piss in the congressional parking lot in full view of secretaries (I could go on and on) would be the brains behind offing the one thing that stood between him and his miserable life's dream. Lots of people have urinated in public and offended their secretaries and staff. Are all these people guilty of various violent crimes? Do you think Oswald is innocent because no one has reported seeing him urinate in public?
333
posted on
11/25/2003 7:06:18 AM PST
by
Tares
To: Tares
Do you think Oswald is innocent because no one has reported seeing him urinate in public?Sorry Linda Bird.
334
posted on
11/25/2003 7:07:47 AM PST
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: Az Joe; All
335
posted on
11/25/2003 8:51:09 AM PST
by
Tares
To: Az Joe
You sound like a lawyer.
336
posted on
11/26/2003 6:21:45 AM PST
by
ampat
(to)
To: Az Joe
oswald did not kill Kennedy... Kennedy was killed as part of a conspiracy......
337
posted on
12/02/2003 9:57:33 AM PST
by
kmrm
To: metalboy
Thats the drivers white shirt collar!
To: metalboy
When you look at that short version, you see something come out the side of the frame. Looked like the shirt collar to me but if you play the whole film it sure looks like he shoots a gun and its perfectly timed to the head shot! The angle of the driver and the position of Kennedy's head could have taken off the right, upper side of his head, at that angle the entrance and the exit could have been blown away with the skull. The head would still have gone back and to the left. As good as the magic bullet conclusion.
To: metalboy; Az Joe
Wow... examining that clip, it looks like Jackie is holding JFK up after the first shot so he can be an easier target. Maybe she knew about his affairs and this was just payback on her part?
Can I prove this theory? Nah... but it is worthy of a book, I am sure some idiots will buy it.
340
posted on
12/07/2003 12:50:43 AM PST
by
ambrose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-358 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson