Posted on 11/18/2003 10:09:03 PM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:10:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
ISTANBUL
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
MIT job opportunity.
===================
Because the President has offered no unambiguous refutation of Islam, instead tries to assuage Islamists by eating iftar dinner with Islamists at the White House, we can see that the President hasn't any idea of what people who want to make the Sharia global law have in mind for the rest of us. There is no evidence that the White House considers the thoughts of Muslims who want to reject the viciously anti-rationalistic element that dominates Islamist thought. CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) has seen to that. They dominate the discussion of Islam.
Bush actually imagines that by being pleasant to everyone, problems will go away because in the end everyone just wants to get along. This is pure political pandering. It's a twelve year old Sunday school student's view of the world. It is a mistaken notion, which has little to do with American ideology and everything to do with trying to be all things to all people.
At the same time in Turkish popular politics there has been a definite trend in the same direction. Thankfully, the Turkish Officer Corps' unambiguous revulsion of the AKP's Islamist themes has been an obstacle to greater Islamist gains there.
The trouble is that in both the American and the Turkish popular mind, affability has replaced analysis and ideological rigor. The idea of intellectually engaging and confronting Islam is absent in both countries, as far as I can see.
Being a pleasant TV personality, and being popular and fun at parties is the problem. Being an irascible crank and not taking any guff off of anyone is the solution.
This requires a self confidence which arises from study, knowledge, and the absolute commitment that the ideas which further human freedom are more important than what others think of you. Jefferson, Lincoln, and Reagan had it. Atatürk, Inönü, and Özal had it. Bush and Erdogan don't.
Greetings, fellow "heathen."
=====================
"Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. You will naturally examine first the religion of your own country. Read the bible then, as you would read Livy or Tacitus."
-- Thomas Jefferson, author of The Declaration of Independence, and later 3rd President of the USA, in a letter to Peter Carr, Aug. 10, 1787
======================
Our two great countries had some pretty sharp Founding Fathers. Other people, critical of our nations, are generally from lesser places without the Law or Moral Philosophy, and are primarily motivated by jealousy.
If there was some highly visible meeting between General Ozkok and General Mushareff of Pakistan, I think that bin Laden wanna-be's and other murderous buffoons would sit up and take notice.
Given the problems they have to deal with, I think that the prevailing attitude is "one bleeding ulcer at a time."
"Turkey can be very influential in Pakistan if it can gain greater political and financial power. There is huge sympathy for Turks among Pakistanis. They believe that we would never sell them out and we believe likewise about them. When the Arabs were stabbing us in the back in WWI they stood by us to the extent of sending their own jewelry to finance the Turkish war effort. They were the only ones that respected us when we had the Caliphate. Their current president speaks fluent Turkish and has profound sympathy for Ataturk.
If only we could suppress the Saudi efforts at Arabizing these people through fundamentalist Islam with extensive financial support to increase welfare and improve their eductational system, we could win this nation back to the civilized world. The country has been struck by decades of poverty, corruption and political chaos. Tens of thousands of people are going to religious schools funded by Wahhabi/Saudi foundations every year because they have no secular schools to go to. If we can bring the rule of secular law into the country and display its benefits, we can show people the right way.
If American money that has been funneled into Saudi Arabia and Egypt over the last two decades had been directed to Pakistan you would have been talking about a significantly different Pakistan."
-- Turk2
If you are still lurking, my friend, please drop us a line!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.