Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. Supreme Court Rules - Gay Couples have the Right to Marry
FoxNews | 11-18-03 | FoxNews

Posted on 11/18/2003 7:02:44 AM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Mass. Supreme Court rules that illegal for state to deny marriage license to gay couples.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; aids; antifamily; gay; godsjudgement; goodridge; hiv; homos; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; judicalactivism; justdamn; legislatingsin; oligarchy; pederasty; perversion; perverts; prisoners; protectmarriage; queers; reprobates; romans1; samesexmarriage; sodomites; sodomy; tyrannyofthefew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 561-565 next last
To: cajungirl
I think it is abusive to children, they deserve their full time father.

How can you think that and then think it's ok for two women to raise a child or two men to raise a child?

381 posted on 11/18/2003 9:29:50 AM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Hot dogs and donuts?

Fudge or carpet samples?

382 posted on 11/18/2003 9:30:01 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Well I am not a bartcop. It is a shock to people here but not all conservatives are as socially conservative as others.
383 posted on 11/18/2003 9:30:38 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
What a platform for the RATS!:

Higher Taxes, Don't fight the terrorists, let guys marry other guys.

A "perfect storm".

384 posted on 11/18/2003 9:31:35 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
I never said that.
385 posted on 11/18/2003 9:31:40 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Ma., the land of Ted Kennedy and Ketchup Kerry, so this doesn't surprise me at all.

Those worthless lunatic libs in Ma. might make heterosexual marriage illegal any day now.
386 posted on 11/18/2003 9:31:40 AM PST by Grampa Dave (George Soros, the Evil Daddy Warbucks, has owned the DemonicRats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Listen..stick to your guns..you make a good argument, though you and I differ....but don't get down in the trash with them..
387 posted on 11/18/2003 9:32:33 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
HOOT! LOL!

Fur traders and boy stalkers.....

388 posted on 11/18/2003 9:32:41 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I'll give you Solomon and David as examples.

Rest assured, I never said you couldn't show examples of plural marriage in the Old Testament. The challenge is to show an example where they worked out well.

389 posted on 11/18/2003 9:32:41 AM PST by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
To: Rutles4Ever

I think it is abusive to women. Every woman deserves her own husband to have full time rights to nag. I think it is abusive to children, they deserve their full time father. I think polygymists are outlaws. I never met one. Polygymists marry under age girls, they use religion to abuse their wives and children.

352 posted on 11/18/2003 10:12 AM MST by cajungirl (no) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies | Report Abuse

390 posted on 11/18/2003 9:35:45 AM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Mears
It was from a professor at Mt. Holyoke that I first learned about LUGS (Lesbians Until Graduation): the homosexual pressure at the college was so great, this professor told me, girls would entire into lesbian relationships even though they were predominately heterosexual in their inclinations. They joked about it as a way to be socially accepted and to stay focused on their work without the distraction of guys. When the graduated and moved to Boston or New York (the destinations for most), they revert to men and, in many cases, get married and raise families. Apparently this has been going on at Holyoke for twenty years or so, although it seems (I am told) to have become almost universal in the past few years.

In college searching for our daughter last year, we carefully investigated most of the Seven Sisters (Smith, Mt. Holyoke, Bryn Mawr, Radcliffe (now fully integrated into Hahvahd), Wellesley, Vassar, and Barnard). Wellesley remains the strongest academically, and they were very interested in my daughter. However, her visit, and the lesbian host she stayed with, quickly convinced her it was not the place for her. A number of alumnae I know are very upset at the whole thing, but don't know what to do, as more and more homosexuals are attracted to the schools, and fewer and fewer heterosexual women are willing to go.

391 posted on 11/18/2003 9:37:02 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke
Poor me,my Senators are Kerry and Kennedy and my Congressman is Barney Frank.I doubt if I contact them it would do much good.

Hope all you posters from other states contact your elected officials to get something done about this.

This was passed just in time for Newton North H.S. in Newton Mass's "Transgender,Bisexual,`Gay,and Lesbian Day" on December 10.

This state has become a sink.
392 posted on 11/18/2003 9:37:19 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
We must free the people to make their own choices.

I was not in favor of this. You make a persuasive argument about freeing the people to make their own choices if we extend no protection to a perverted lifestyle of choice. What would they have done with this problem in 1792 ? They would have squashed it like a bug.

The vast majority will make the right choice. Absent the force of government, the forces of social normalcy will win every time.

393 posted on 11/18/2003 9:39:28 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: xzins
This ruling cannot be limited to just "gay" couples. The Court has essentially ruled that there are no limitations on marriage between two or more adults. Polygamy cannot be prohibited. Neither can a marriage between a brother and sister. Neither can a marriage between a Father and Daughter or a Father and son or a mother and a son or a mother and a daughter, or a polygamous marriage between a father and his son and daughter or many sons and daughters.

This ruling is as insane as can be. This is the end of the judiciary and common sense. I cannot respect a court that would make such a stupid insane ruling. But this is what the godless democrats have wrought upon this nation.

I am not surprised.
394 posted on 11/18/2003 9:39:42 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Milquetoast Q. Whitebread is alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mears
"Transgender,Bisexual,`Gay,and Lesbian Day" on December 10.

I'm quite sure that they've added "Questioning" to the title. If they haven't, they will soon, as this is used to recruit adolescents who are unsure about their sexuality or are just having trouble fitting in.

395 posted on 11/18/2003 9:42:04 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
This fits in with Dean's take on the subject. Dean advocates NO marriage JUST civil unions. This fits in with the de-recognistion of marriage as an institution.

In other words there will no longer be a marriage license which is non-religious. (priests are generally notaries and they execute the marriage license in their capacity as a notary for Gov purposes.) The only document to be issued will be a domestic partnership agreement.

This is more a move to make marriage a mere contract. Of course this would make all the model laws on domestic relations irrelivant.
396 posted on 11/18/2003 9:42:48 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I appreciate your posts on this forum, jwalsh07.
397 posted on 11/18/2003 9:43:49 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1024056/posts?page=250#250

Go to the above and tell me what you think of those ideas about civil disobedience.

What would you add to the list, if anything? What do you think of the idea?

What would happen if 100's of 100,000's participated?
398 posted on 11/18/2003 9:46:58 AM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Adult incest is legal.

Polygamy will become legal based on the contractual model Mass has adopted.

Homosexuals have always sought to do away with the age of consent. They want your children.

The homosexual movement is now officially the modern inheritors of the National Socialist movement of 1930-40's Germany. They have used their tactics to a tee. Where are the "never again" people?
399 posted on 11/18/2003 9:47:18 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
First woman approved as head of Massachusetts high court

BOSTON (AP) — Justice Margaret Marshall was elevated to chief justice of Massachusetts' highest court Wednesday, becoming the first woman to head the nation's oldest appellate court.

Ms. Marshall, a former chief counsel at Harvard University, overcame charges of anti-Catholic bias to win a 6-3 confirmation vote by the Governor's Council, which votes on nominations by the governor.

"1 follow in the footsteps of giants," Ms. Marshall said. "1 do so with humility, and with a deep commitment to the rule of law."

Ms. Marshall, 55, a native of South Africa,

was appointed an associate justice of the Supreme Judicial Court in 1996. She was at Harvard at the time and had previously been in private practice.

Her nomination to head the 307-year-old court was marred when Cardinal Bernard Law raised concerns that she harbored anti-Catholic bias.

Law, who heads the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston, wrote last month to Gov. Paul Cellucci and said Ms. Marshall was "open to serious charges of anti-Catholicism."

He cited an incident in which Ms. Marshall, while at Harvard, chastised a professor who had used university stationery for a personal note with an anti-abortion message.

Catholic groups also feared she could not be impartial on abortion cases because she once served on an abortion clinic's board of trustees. Ms. Marshall denied her personal views would affect her role as jurist.

Law later retracted his complaint after speaking with Ms. Marshall, who is Protestant. "She gave me her assurance that she was not anti-Catholic," he said, "and I have absolutely no reason to not accept her word on that."

Is Justice Margaret Marshall a U.S Citizens?

400 posted on 11/18/2003 9:49:02 AM PST by freetradenotfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 561-565 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson