Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the 9
"The Federal Courts may be in error, you and Mr. Moore may be right, but they are not criminals, and Mr. Moore is."

You mentioned we are a nation of laws. But we are not a nation that worships laws. That is a vital point.

Thomas Jefferson was a criminal when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. John Hancock was a criminal when he signed it. Patrick Henry was a criminal when he said, "Give me liberty, or give me death." Prior to the Civil War, people who smuggled slaves out of the plantations were criminals. More recently, Soviet defectors were criminals. The people who defied Saddam Insane were, technically, criminals. The Iranian students resisting the mullahs are, technically speaking, criminals. I honor all of them! They stand for something higher than the law! The real crime here is the crime of tyranny.

Yes, we must vote out the slime that defends this perversity. Until that time, we must speak out for every man who defends himself with an 'unregistered gun', every veteran who hoists the US flag in defiance of neighborhood rules, and anyone who mounts the 10 Commandments on his or her wall, no matter where that wall is.

No member of the public 'offended' by the 10 Commandments should have the power to oppress the rest of us. No atheist I know of in congress has had the nerve to be 'offended' by the morning prayer before each session, not since the founding of our nation. That speaks volumes.

It is our heritage, and no one can sanely argue that it is not the intent of our Founding Fathers, which is what our judiciary is sworn to uphold, the Constitution, the written intent of our Founding Fathers. Do actions not speak louder than words? The behavior of our Founding Fathers, shortly after signing the Constitution, is the behavior they intended when they wrote it.

The legal system is so perverted, so few judges have been impeached, that they say we must pay artists who defile the crucifix [Piss Christ] with our tax money, and they say that killing an unborn child must be protected by the law. If someone illegally shows photos of a murdered unborn child to a woman at a family planning center, it might be against the 'Almighty Law', just as rescuing slaves was against the 'Almighty Law' prior to the Civil War. If you place law above righteousness, let the blood and the perversity be on your hands.
44 posted on 11/16/2003 4:38:18 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Demokkkrats and their 'Conscience of the Senate'--- KKK Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March
It is our heritage, and no one can sanely argue that it is not the intent of our Founding Fathers, which is what our judiciary is sworn to uphold, the Constitution, the written intent of our Founding Fathers. Do actions not speak louder than words? The behavior of our Founding Fathers, shortly after signing the Constitution, is the behavior they intended when they wrote it.

Fine bro, if that is the way you wanna do it.

Either the courts decide what the laws are, like it or not, or we each decide for ourselves, and you will like that a lot less.

You sound like a damned DemonRat, whining that your desires are special and different, that you are an opressed minority entitled to break the law cause 'the man' is out to get you.

Mr. Moore needs to grow up, take responsibility for his actions, accept his punishment as just and get on with life.

So9 So9

53 posted on 11/16/2003 5:25:10 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson