Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Six Days? (Six Days of Creation, Literal Days or Era's.
Koinonia House ^ | 11/15/2003 | Dr. Chuck Missler

Posted on 11/15/2003 10:50:03 PM PST by bondserv

Part One of a Series:
Why Six Days?
by Chuck Missler

The Book of Genesis presents a disturbing problem for many Bible-believing Christians. Did God really create the heaven and the earth in just six 24-hour days? How does a serious student of the Torah - the five books of Moses - reconcile the Genesis account with the "billions of years" encountered in the dictums of astronomy, geology, et al?

Many continue to attempt to circumvent the problem by assuming that the six days represent "geological eras," or that the traditional text is simply a rhetorical "framework" for a literary summary of the creative process. Various forms of "theistic evolution" have been contrived in attempts to reconcile the Biblical text with the various theories and conjectures which dominate our evolution-based society.

However, the sincere student cannot escape the confrontations which result from the straightforward reading of the text with the ostensible declarations of "science." How can we deal with these fundamental issues?

Why Is It So Critical?

There are four basic questions that confront all of us: Who am I? Where did I come from? Why am I here? Where am I going when I die?

And your eternal destiny will be determined by your "world view" in addressing these issues. And there are really only two world-views: either everything - including you - is the result of some kind of cosmic accident, or this is all the result of a deliberate design by a Designer.

This issue could not be more fundamental to everything. It comes as a shock to many to discover that every major theme and doctrine in the Bible has its roots in this "Book of Beginnings": sovereign election; salvation, justification by faith, believer's security, separation, disciplinary chastisement, the Divine Incarnation, the "rapture" of the church, death and resurrection, the priesthoods (both Aaronic and Melchizedekian), the Antichrist, and even the Palestinian Covenant that is being challenged by the continuing tensions throughout the world today all have their roots in this critical foundational book of the Bible. And each of these issues also has its consummation in the Book of (the) Revelation. (Like every good textbook, the answers are always in the back!)

Who Really Wrote the Torah?

There are those who have suggested the books of Moses were actually compilations by a number of redactors over the years - the common "Documentary Hypothesis" being one of the most prevalent theories. Fortunately, these previously popular notions have been thoroughly shredded by competent scholarship. But allow me to save you many hours of boring library research. I know who wrote the Books of Moses: Moses did. How do I know? Jesus Christ Himself said so! Many times.1

Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? - John 5:45-47

Jesus quotes from each of the books of the Torah and attributes them each to Moses. The New Testament includes 165 direct quotes (and over 200 allusions) to the Book of Genesis, and over 100 of these are from the first 11 chapters. These include the Creator and the creation, 2 (and allusions3), creation of man and woman,4 the fall of man,5 the Flood of Noah,6 etc. So if you believe in Jesus Christ, you have no problem as to who wrote the Book of Genesis. (And if you don't believe in Jesus Christ, you have much bigger problems than the authorship of Genesis!)

But "Six Days"?

The account of the creation of the universe in six days still is a "bone in the throat" to many Christians. Many point out that the word for "day" is yom

, and is translated to 54 other words; however, 1181 of 1480 occurrences it is "day," and when used with a number it is always a literal day. But the real problem isn't the account in Genesis. It is in Exodus. In the middle of the Ten Commandments, the Creator Himself wrote it with His own finger in stone!

For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it. - Exodus 20:11

It is undeniable that God intended us to understand that it was, indeed, six literal days. So how do we deal with the common understanding that "billions of years" was involved? How do we deal with the astronomical distances of millions of "light years" between the galaxies of the universe? Can anyone familiar with the discoveries of modern science take the Genesis account seriously?

It may come as a pleasant surprise to discover that the more you know about modern science - the real physics, not the mythology and conjectures that masquerade as "science" - the more you can take the Biblical text seriously. The Lord always rewards the diligent. (A recent book includes articles by fifty top scientists - from many different fields of specialization - who declare why they believe in a literal six-day creation. 7)

The Nature of Time

One of the many advantages that 20th century science has given us is that, thanks to Dr. Albert Einstein's brilliant discoveries, we now know that time is a physical property and is subject to mass, acceleration, and gravity. We have come to realize that we live in a four-dimensional continuum properly known as "space-time." (This is what Paul seems to imply in his letter to the Ephesians!8) It is interesting that when one takes the apparent 1012 expansion factor involved in the theories of the "expanding universe," that an assumed 16 billion years reduce to six days!

Furthermore, the astronomical timetables now seem to be entirely overturned with the reluctant acknowledgments that the speed of light is not longer regarded as the constant that the high priests of physics had been previously convinced of.

The Nature of Light

Not only have recent scientific articles highlighted the discoveries that the speed of light has changed over the centuries (something that Barry Setterfield has been declaring for decades) the very nature of light has ripped open the entire world of quantum physics that has shattered our concepts of reality itself.

The changes in the velocity of light not only impacts our understanding of the astronomical distances and properties, it affects the atomic behavior involved in the red shift of spectra, the reliability of radiological dating, etc. It is the peculiar properties of photons themselves that continue to astonish the quantum physicists wrestling with the very nature of our physical existence. It is now recognized that subatomic particles lack a property known as "locality." All subatomic particles are now understood to be immediately connected. There is a simultaneity - a "non-locality" - among all photons that has been confirmed in the laboratory. It now appears that our entire universe may actually be a gigantic hologram of some kind. 9

The Fabric of Space

Most of us assume that space is simply an empty vacuum with nothing "in it." However, it is increasingly evident that even empty space has astonishing properties that have yet to be fully understood. We now know that this "firmament,"(raqia) which the Scripture presents, possesses electromagnetic properties including dielectric permittivity, magnetic permeability, an intrinsic impedance,10 and has an astonishing "zero-point" energy sufficient to keep all the electrons in the entire universe in their orbits.11 The term "stretching the heavens" appears at least 17 times in the Scriptures.12

According to the Scriptures, the heavens can be "torn,"13 "worn out" like a garment,14 "shaken,"15 "burnt up,"16 "split apart" like a scroll,17 rolled up" like a mantle 18 or a scroll.19

The concept of being "rolled up" carries some additional insights. There must be some dimension in which space is "thin." If space can be "bent," there must be a direction it can be bent toward. Thus, this tells us that there must be additional dimensions beyond those of space itself. It is now understood that we live in even more than four dimensions: ten dimensions is the current estimate (which is precisely what Nachmonides concluded in his commentary on Genesis back in the 13th century!) The more we understand from the current perspectives of modern physics, the more comfortable we are with the chronicle in Genesis One.

The Architecture of the Solar System

The more we study our solar system, the more questions get raised. Here, too, the prevailing assumptions that are broadly taught are totally specious. The "Nebular Hypothesis," that the planets were somehow thrown off by the sun, is mathematically untenable. There is no plausible explanation that would support a solar origin of the planets. The sun contains 99.86% of all the mass of the solar system, and yet contains only 1.9% of the angular momentum. The nine planets contain 98.1%. Furthermore, the outer planets are far larger than the inner ones. (Jupiter is 5,750 times as massive as mercury, 2,958 times as massive as Mars, etc.)

There are many other provocative enigmas concerning our planetary history:

o There are three pairs of rapid-spin rates among our planets: Mars and Earth, Jupiter and Saturn, and Neptune and Uranus, are each within 3% of each other. Why?

o Earth and Mars have virtually identical spin axis tilts (about 23.5°). Why? (From angular momentum and orbital calculations, it would seem that the three pairs of these planets may have been brought here from elsewhere.)

o Why does Mars have 93% of its craters in one hemisphere and only 7% in the other? It would appear that over 80% occurred within a single half-hour!

It's almost as if God designed it to challenge any naturalistic hypotheses!

"Evening" and "Morning"?

The Hebrew terms, Erev,and Boker, now refer to "evening" and "morning" but their origins remain obscure. Erev

designates obscuration, mixture (increasing entropy). The time when encroaching darkness begins to deny the ability to discern forms, shapes, and identities; thus, it becomes a term for twilight or evening.20 This also marks the duration of impurity, when a ceremonially unclean person became clean again,21 and thus, the beginning of the Hebrew day.

Boker is a designation for becoming discernible, distinguishable, visible; perception of order; relief of obscurity (decreasing entropy). It thus is associated with being able to begin to discern forms, shapes, and distinct identities; breaking forth of light; revealing; hence, denotatively, dawn, morning. (As traditional designations for the Hebrew day, technically it would seem to only designate the nighttime hours, but it is used connotatively for the entire calendar day.)

It is noteworthy that neither of these are recorded on the seventh day, and thus their original significance may have been to designate the increments of creation.

Other Issues

There are other questions that arise from the Genesis narrative. When was the earth created? It seems to have preceded the rest of the universe. Surprisingly, there are some cosmologists that are (again) beginning to suspect that the universe may be geocentric after all! How did plants (3rd day) flourish without the sun's photosynthesis (4th day)? When were the angels created? (They apparently witnessed the events of Genesis 1.) 22 When did Satan fall? He had apparently already fallen by Chapter 3.

As we explore these, and other, enigmas that emerge from the Biblical text, let us not confuse the precision of the text with conjectures and mythology that pervades our pagan culture and uninformed classrooms. (It's tragic that we can't insist on evidence-based education for our children rather than the foolishness and dogma that continues to strip them of their God-fearing heritage.)

But the more acquainted you become with the amazing discoveries and insights from the frontiers of science - and are able to dismiss the nonsense that prevails among the uninformed - the more comfortable the Genesis text becomes! We plan to continue this series of articles in the unmitigated aspiration of stimulating you to dig ever deeper into God's inerrant Word!


Notes:      

  1. Matthew 8:4; 19:7,8; 23:2; Mark 1:44; 10:3,4; 7:10; Luke 5:14; 16:19, 31; 20:37; 24:27,44; John 3:14; 5:39,45,46; 6:32; 7:19, 22,23.
  2. Matthew 13:35; Mark 13:19; John 1:3; Acts 4:24; 14:15; Romans 1:20; 2 Corinthians 4:6; Colossians 1:16; Hebrews 1:10; 11:3.
  3. Romans 1:25; 16:25; Ephesians 3:9; 1 Timothy 4:4; Hebrews 2:10; 4:10; 9:26; James 3:9; Revelation 3:14; 4:11; 10:6; 14:7.
  4. Matthew 19:4-6, 8; Mark 10:6; Acts 17:26; 1 Corinthians 6:16; 11:8,9; Ephesians 5:31; 1 Timothy 2:13, 14; Revelation 2:7; 22:2, 14.
  5. Romans 5:11, 14, 17, 19; 8:19-20; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22; 2 Corinthians 11:3; Revelation 20:2.
  6. Matthew 24:37; Luke 17:26; 1 Peter 3:20; 2 Peter 2:5; 3:5-61.
  7. John F. Ashton, In Six Days , Master Books, Green Forest AR, 2001.
  8. Ephesians 3:18.
  9. Cf. "Information in the Holographic Universe," Scientific American , August 2003.
  10. Any radio ham that has had to tune an antenna array knows about the 377 ohms.
  11. It has been estimated at a staggering 1.071 x 10117 kilowatts per square meter!
  12. 2 Samuel 22:10; Job 9:8; 26:7; 37:18; Psalm 18:9; 104:2; 144:5; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; Ezekiel 1:22; Zechariah 12:1.
  13. Isaiah 64:1.
  14. Psalm 102:25.
  15. Hebrews 12:26, Haggai 2:6, Isaiah 13:13.
  16. 2 Peter 3:12.
  17. Revelation 6:14.
  18. Hebrews 1:12.
  19. Isaiah 34:4.
  20. Proverbs 7:9; Jeremiah 6:4.
  21. Leviticus 15.
  22. Job 4:7.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; god
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 541-546 next last
To: azhenfud
But didn't that happen that same day?
381 posted on 11/18/2003 1:34:20 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"Can we say.. DECEPTION? (and a VERY short attention span!)"

Ah, perhaps that is it. Those who try to claim the two accounts are contradictory (or two separate creations - I've heard that one before too) are simply trying to be deceptive.

Or perhaps they cannot retain enough information from one account to another to be able discern that the only difference is focus.

382 posted on 11/18/2003 2:04:09 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Dang!

Why didn't I see that?

It's really so simple.............
383 posted on 11/18/2003 2:19:03 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Please clarify your position....

Good luck...............

384 posted on 11/18/2003 2:20:06 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
Well then: since even the great Roman Empire was drawn into His influence, just what DO you believe has caused the obviously illogical following of so many people (in the first century --dang! I can't even get away from Him there...) to worship and adore a blatent fabrication?

I interpret you argument as: since there are a lot of Christian, Christianity must be more correct. I do not agree with that premise. 

Why do you have to INTERPRET anything??
 
I HIGHLIGHTED your words and asked about them --> just what DO you believe <-- that's it; the original, the only.  Everything else I've posted has just added to the confusion.




 
Your reply to 247 stated that followers of Christianity are better then followers of Buddhism and Islam.
 
No.. I did not.
 
Is English not your first language?

385 posted on 11/18/2003 2:26:55 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
No, the spiritual death didn't occur until after God pronounced judgement and removed them both from the garden. Until the curse, there was no death. Genesis 3:19

Thank you Satan, for clearing this up.



Hear the very words of GOD!


 
 
NIV Genesis 2:16-17
 16.  And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden;
 17.  but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."
 

Genesis 3
 1.  Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, `You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
 2.  The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,
 3.  but God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.'"
 4.  "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman.
 5.  "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
 6.  When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
 
 
NIV Genesis 3:22-23
 22.  And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."  (to avoid the death that is NOW on him!)
 23.  So the LORD God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken.

386 posted on 11/18/2003 2:33:20 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: agrace
How long did it take you

Once you have the alef bet down, you will be surprised how much you can sound out - then you will be READING it!. Hebrew reads phonetically.

Shalom!
387 posted on 11/18/2003 4:20:21 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Excellent good bondserv! Your posts are always thoughtful, deep and rewarding. :) I will leave you to your repose now. But like Columbo, I have to come back and ask "Is it evening or is it morning, of the sixth day? (I don't know)
388 posted on 11/18/2003 5:04:14 PM PST by Markofhumanfeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
No doubt I was thinking of "perp" as in AMW. It's walking about in these sandals that causes it.
389 posted on 11/18/2003 5:08:53 PM PST by Markofhumanfeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Thy politeness is very unusual in this country. Alas the saying is from an old Hebrew commentary I found in the park. I will go see if I can find the page again to see just what text it refers unto. Peace and perspicacity to you.
390 posted on 11/18/2003 5:12:46 PM PST by Markofhumanfeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
I don't need a lecture about how to read the ORIGINAL TEXT. Obviously you know that there were TWO days of creating "man in the flesh" else you would have stayed with exactly what the ORIGINAL HEBREW "LOCKED" IN says.

I KNOW that in Genesis 1:2 that "WAS" should be "BECAME". I also know the Genesis 1:2 is described by Jeremiah, that "special" one, the one our Heavenly Father told he foreknew before he was ever in his mother's womb, that one who tells the story of the "overthrow" prior to "man in the flesh" being created. (Jeremiah 4) Jeremiah 23 paints what our Heavenly Father thinks of some.

Jeremiah 24 is also an interesting read and gives some insight about that Garden of EDEN.

There are many places in the WHOLE BIBLE that gives a "glimpse" for those of us in the FLESH to understand those first "6" Chapters of GENESIS. Christ Himself had a few things to tell about the GARDEN PARTY. Parable of FIG Tree for starters. Parable of Sower gives another INSIGHT.

I also know that "the Adam" is not the same as the "man" in the 1st Chapter.

Exodus 31:15-17 Repeats that Commandment regarding the 7th day of Creation which our Heavenly Father "RESTED", thus we are to "REMEMBER", IT is a sign between ME and the CHILDREN of ISRAEL "FOR EVER".

The subject is not the "Creation" of "man" in the flesh. "6" days our Heavenly Father WORKED then "RESTED" on the 7th.

Changing the subject about exactly what story is told in the ORIGINAL TEXT, LOCKED in so NO 'MAN' can change is TELLING.

391 posted on 11/18/2003 6:15:47 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
I am not ignoring you have not had time to respond, but will get back to you.
392 posted on 11/18/2003 6:19:26 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Now if you have followed what I have said and because of the fact that we are not told exactly how long "days" of creation were that "man in the flesh" could be or might be up to 12,000 + years old.

I don't know because we are not told exactly the time span of these days, so it does not bother me that I don't know yet.

I can only go on what is said and what is "locked" in via the MASSORAH. I do not read "original" Hebrew but know how to look up the meaning of words "man" has been allowed to place there.

The Chinese claim to have history which if "TRUE" predates 6,000 years of 'man'. Keeping that in mind if "TRUE" would tell more about the length of those "days".
393 posted on 11/18/2003 6:31:04 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Could have been, but I think there was a span of some time between the actual deed of disobedience and the curse of judgement; consider God walking in "the cool of the day". Possibly morning of the next day? I don't know....
394 posted on 11/18/2003 7:04:02 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"Thank you Satan, for clearing this up."

So Elsie, because you disagree with my understanding of Genesis 3:19, you consider me "SATAN"?

395 posted on 11/18/2003 7:10:59 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Well, I'd like you to know you've some interesting views and I intend to give them more serious thought....
396 posted on 11/18/2003 7:31:22 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
So Elsie, because you disagree with my understanding of Genesis 3:19, you consider me "SATAN"?
 
I merely pointed out that Gen 2:17 preceded 3:19.........
 
No, YOU are not Satan,  (I just KNEW I'd probably ruffle yer feathers ;^), but the IDEA is.
 
 
Even PETER had Jesus saying this type of thing in his direction:
NIV Matthew 16:21-23
 21.  From that time on Jesus began to explain to his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life.
 22.  Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "Never, Lord!" he said. "This shall never happen to you!"
 23.  Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."
 
NIV Mark 8:31-33
 31.  He then began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and after three days rise again.
 32.  He spoke plainly about this, and Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him.
 33.  But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. "Get behind me, Satan!" he said.
We've all seen the cartoon of a little devil on one shoulder and a small angel on the other, giving conflicting information to the poor human, who is always in a dilemma as to what is the right course of action.

 
When Satan asked Eve if GOD said this:
"Did God really say, `You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?",
he KNEW that GOD had NOT said that exact sentence.  So Eve was set up to reply that GOD had not said it: but, she did NOT repeat back to Satan what GOD DID say! 
 
By not using 'the Word of God', she manages to fumble around and add her own spin "and not TOUCH it, either" which got her in FURTHER trouble by attributing THOSE WORDS to GOD, which in fact, they were not.
 
It is VERY important to know EXACTLY what was said by God, don't you think? 
 
So when Peter, who had just been told, BY JESUS HIMSELF what MUST happen, he in effect calls Jesus a liar.
 
Jesus, knowing who put those thoughts into his mind so they'd come out his mouth, talked directly to the one who had influenced him.
 
That is why I posted what I did, using your name, but it was directed at the one would will try, by any means possible, to keep us from hearing GOD's clear voice to us.
 
1 Peter 4:7-11
 7.  The end of all things is near. Therefore be clear minded and self-controlled so that you can pray.
 8.  Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.
 9.  Offer hospitality to one another without grumbling.
 10.  Each one should use whatever gift he has received to serve others, faithfully administering God's grace in its various forms.
 11.  If anyone speaks, he should do it as one speaking the very words of God. If anyone serves, he should do it with the strength God provides, so that in all things God may be praised through Jesus Christ. To him be the glory and the power for ever and ever. Amen.

397 posted on 11/18/2003 8:05:04 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
HIGHLIGHTED your words and asked about them --> just what DO you believe <-- that's it; the original, the only. Everything else I've posted has just added to the confusion.

I think I should be asking this question to you. What do you think made you believe in Christianity? If you like, I can answer what makes me believe in Judaism. We could ask a Muslim and a Buddhist what caused them to believe in their respective religions.

A more direct response would be - I have no idea what makes other people believe in things I do not. (Quite frankly, most times I don’t care why people choose to believe in things I do not.) As long as I am free to practice my faith, I have no objections to other people, peacefully, practicing theirs.

Your reply to 247 stated that followers of Christianity are better then followers of Buddhism and Islam.

No.. I did not.


I beg to differ. Your post 250 stated (with regard to the two religions):

Rational, freedom loving followers. Our God isn't capricious.

Finally, in answer to your question:

Is English not your first language?

Actually, its not my first language. But I think I do quite well with what little I've learned.
398 posted on 11/18/2003 9:35:11 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Markofhumanfeet
AMW?
399 posted on 11/19/2003 12:23:54 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
I beg to differ. Your post 250 stated (with regard to the two religions):

UHhh....

BONDSERV posted that: not me...........

400 posted on 11/19/2003 4:44:05 AM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson