Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Six Days? (Six Days of Creation, Literal Days or Era's.
Koinonia House ^ | 11/15/2003 | Dr. Chuck Missler

Posted on 11/15/2003 10:50:03 PM PST by bondserv

Part One of a Series:
Why Six Days?
by Chuck Missler

The Book of Genesis presents a disturbing problem for many Bible-believing Christians. Did God really create the heaven and the earth in just six 24-hour days? How does a serious student of the Torah - the five books of Moses - reconcile the Genesis account with the "billions of years" encountered in the dictums of astronomy, geology, et al?

Many continue to attempt to circumvent the problem by assuming that the six days represent "geological eras," or that the traditional text is simply a rhetorical "framework" for a literary summary of the creative process. Various forms of "theistic evolution" have been contrived in attempts to reconcile the Biblical text with the various theories and conjectures which dominate our evolution-based society.

However, the sincere student cannot escape the confrontations which result from the straightforward reading of the text with the ostensible declarations of "science." How can we deal with these fundamental issues?

Why Is It So Critical?

There are four basic questions that confront all of us: Who am I? Where did I come from? Why am I here? Where am I going when I die?

And your eternal destiny will be determined by your "world view" in addressing these issues. And there are really only two world-views: either everything - including you - is the result of some kind of cosmic accident, or this is all the result of a deliberate design by a Designer.

This issue could not be more fundamental to everything. It comes as a shock to many to discover that every major theme and doctrine in the Bible has its roots in this "Book of Beginnings": sovereign election; salvation, justification by faith, believer's security, separation, disciplinary chastisement, the Divine Incarnation, the "rapture" of the church, death and resurrection, the priesthoods (both Aaronic and Melchizedekian), the Antichrist, and even the Palestinian Covenant that is being challenged by the continuing tensions throughout the world today all have their roots in this critical foundational book of the Bible. And each of these issues also has its consummation in the Book of (the) Revelation. (Like every good textbook, the answers are always in the back!)

Who Really Wrote the Torah?

There are those who have suggested the books of Moses were actually compilations by a number of redactors over the years - the common "Documentary Hypothesis" being one of the most prevalent theories. Fortunately, these previously popular notions have been thoroughly shredded by competent scholarship. But allow me to save you many hours of boring library research. I know who wrote the Books of Moses: Moses did. How do I know? Jesus Christ Himself said so! Many times.1

Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? - John 5:45-47

Jesus quotes from each of the books of the Torah and attributes them each to Moses. The New Testament includes 165 direct quotes (and over 200 allusions) to the Book of Genesis, and over 100 of these are from the first 11 chapters. These include the Creator and the creation, 2 (and allusions3), creation of man and woman,4 the fall of man,5 the Flood of Noah,6 etc. So if you believe in Jesus Christ, you have no problem as to who wrote the Book of Genesis. (And if you don't believe in Jesus Christ, you have much bigger problems than the authorship of Genesis!)

But "Six Days"?

The account of the creation of the universe in six days still is a "bone in the throat" to many Christians. Many point out that the word for "day" is yom

, and is translated to 54 other words; however, 1181 of 1480 occurrences it is "day," and when used with a number it is always a literal day. But the real problem isn't the account in Genesis. It is in Exodus. In the middle of the Ten Commandments, the Creator Himself wrote it with His own finger in stone!

For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it. - Exodus 20:11

It is undeniable that God intended us to understand that it was, indeed, six literal days. So how do we deal with the common understanding that "billions of years" was involved? How do we deal with the astronomical distances of millions of "light years" between the galaxies of the universe? Can anyone familiar with the discoveries of modern science take the Genesis account seriously?

It may come as a pleasant surprise to discover that the more you know about modern science - the real physics, not the mythology and conjectures that masquerade as "science" - the more you can take the Biblical text seriously. The Lord always rewards the diligent. (A recent book includes articles by fifty top scientists - from many different fields of specialization - who declare why they believe in a literal six-day creation. 7)

The Nature of Time

One of the many advantages that 20th century science has given us is that, thanks to Dr. Albert Einstein's brilliant discoveries, we now know that time is a physical property and is subject to mass, acceleration, and gravity. We have come to realize that we live in a four-dimensional continuum properly known as "space-time." (This is what Paul seems to imply in his letter to the Ephesians!8) It is interesting that when one takes the apparent 1012 expansion factor involved in the theories of the "expanding universe," that an assumed 16 billion years reduce to six days!

Furthermore, the astronomical timetables now seem to be entirely overturned with the reluctant acknowledgments that the speed of light is not longer regarded as the constant that the high priests of physics had been previously convinced of.

The Nature of Light

Not only have recent scientific articles highlighted the discoveries that the speed of light has changed over the centuries (something that Barry Setterfield has been declaring for decades) the very nature of light has ripped open the entire world of quantum physics that has shattered our concepts of reality itself.

The changes in the velocity of light not only impacts our understanding of the astronomical distances and properties, it affects the atomic behavior involved in the red shift of spectra, the reliability of radiological dating, etc. It is the peculiar properties of photons themselves that continue to astonish the quantum physicists wrestling with the very nature of our physical existence. It is now recognized that subatomic particles lack a property known as "locality." All subatomic particles are now understood to be immediately connected. There is a simultaneity - a "non-locality" - among all photons that has been confirmed in the laboratory. It now appears that our entire universe may actually be a gigantic hologram of some kind. 9

The Fabric of Space

Most of us assume that space is simply an empty vacuum with nothing "in it." However, it is increasingly evident that even empty space has astonishing properties that have yet to be fully understood. We now know that this "firmament,"(raqia) which the Scripture presents, possesses electromagnetic properties including dielectric permittivity, magnetic permeability, an intrinsic impedance,10 and has an astonishing "zero-point" energy sufficient to keep all the electrons in the entire universe in their orbits.11 The term "stretching the heavens" appears at least 17 times in the Scriptures.12

According to the Scriptures, the heavens can be "torn,"13 "worn out" like a garment,14 "shaken,"15 "burnt up,"16 "split apart" like a scroll,17 rolled up" like a mantle 18 or a scroll.19

The concept of being "rolled up" carries some additional insights. There must be some dimension in which space is "thin." If space can be "bent," there must be a direction it can be bent toward. Thus, this tells us that there must be additional dimensions beyond those of space itself. It is now understood that we live in even more than four dimensions: ten dimensions is the current estimate (which is precisely what Nachmonides concluded in his commentary on Genesis back in the 13th century!) The more we understand from the current perspectives of modern physics, the more comfortable we are with the chronicle in Genesis One.

The Architecture of the Solar System

The more we study our solar system, the more questions get raised. Here, too, the prevailing assumptions that are broadly taught are totally specious. The "Nebular Hypothesis," that the planets were somehow thrown off by the sun, is mathematically untenable. There is no plausible explanation that would support a solar origin of the planets. The sun contains 99.86% of all the mass of the solar system, and yet contains only 1.9% of the angular momentum. The nine planets contain 98.1%. Furthermore, the outer planets are far larger than the inner ones. (Jupiter is 5,750 times as massive as mercury, 2,958 times as massive as Mars, etc.)

There are many other provocative enigmas concerning our planetary history:

o There are three pairs of rapid-spin rates among our planets: Mars and Earth, Jupiter and Saturn, and Neptune and Uranus, are each within 3% of each other. Why?

o Earth and Mars have virtually identical spin axis tilts (about 23.5°). Why? (From angular momentum and orbital calculations, it would seem that the three pairs of these planets may have been brought here from elsewhere.)

o Why does Mars have 93% of its craters in one hemisphere and only 7% in the other? It would appear that over 80% occurred within a single half-hour!

It's almost as if God designed it to challenge any naturalistic hypotheses!

"Evening" and "Morning"?

The Hebrew terms, Erev,and Boker, now refer to "evening" and "morning" but their origins remain obscure. Erev

designates obscuration, mixture (increasing entropy). The time when encroaching darkness begins to deny the ability to discern forms, shapes, and identities; thus, it becomes a term for twilight or evening.20 This also marks the duration of impurity, when a ceremonially unclean person became clean again,21 and thus, the beginning of the Hebrew day.

Boker is a designation for becoming discernible, distinguishable, visible; perception of order; relief of obscurity (decreasing entropy). It thus is associated with being able to begin to discern forms, shapes, and distinct identities; breaking forth of light; revealing; hence, denotatively, dawn, morning. (As traditional designations for the Hebrew day, technically it would seem to only designate the nighttime hours, but it is used connotatively for the entire calendar day.)

It is noteworthy that neither of these are recorded on the seventh day, and thus their original significance may have been to designate the increments of creation.

Other Issues

There are other questions that arise from the Genesis narrative. When was the earth created? It seems to have preceded the rest of the universe. Surprisingly, there are some cosmologists that are (again) beginning to suspect that the universe may be geocentric after all! How did plants (3rd day) flourish without the sun's photosynthesis (4th day)? When were the angels created? (They apparently witnessed the events of Genesis 1.) 22 When did Satan fall? He had apparently already fallen by Chapter 3.

As we explore these, and other, enigmas that emerge from the Biblical text, let us not confuse the precision of the text with conjectures and mythology that pervades our pagan culture and uninformed classrooms. (It's tragic that we can't insist on evidence-based education for our children rather than the foolishness and dogma that continues to strip them of their God-fearing heritage.)

But the more acquainted you become with the amazing discoveries and insights from the frontiers of science - and are able to dismiss the nonsense that prevails among the uninformed - the more comfortable the Genesis text becomes! We plan to continue this series of articles in the unmitigated aspiration of stimulating you to dig ever deeper into God's inerrant Word!


Notes:      

  1. Matthew 8:4; 19:7,8; 23:2; Mark 1:44; 10:3,4; 7:10; Luke 5:14; 16:19, 31; 20:37; 24:27,44; John 3:14; 5:39,45,46; 6:32; 7:19, 22,23.
  2. Matthew 13:35; Mark 13:19; John 1:3; Acts 4:24; 14:15; Romans 1:20; 2 Corinthians 4:6; Colossians 1:16; Hebrews 1:10; 11:3.
  3. Romans 1:25; 16:25; Ephesians 3:9; 1 Timothy 4:4; Hebrews 2:10; 4:10; 9:26; James 3:9; Revelation 3:14; 4:11; 10:6; 14:7.
  4. Matthew 19:4-6, 8; Mark 10:6; Acts 17:26; 1 Corinthians 6:16; 11:8,9; Ephesians 5:31; 1 Timothy 2:13, 14; Revelation 2:7; 22:2, 14.
  5. Romans 5:11, 14, 17, 19; 8:19-20; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22; 2 Corinthians 11:3; Revelation 20:2.
  6. Matthew 24:37; Luke 17:26; 1 Peter 3:20; 2 Peter 2:5; 3:5-61.
  7. John F. Ashton, In Six Days , Master Books, Green Forest AR, 2001.
  8. Ephesians 3:18.
  9. Cf. "Information in the Holographic Universe," Scientific American , August 2003.
  10. Any radio ham that has had to tune an antenna array knows about the 377 ohms.
  11. It has been estimated at a staggering 1.071 x 10117 kilowatts per square meter!
  12. 2 Samuel 22:10; Job 9:8; 26:7; 37:18; Psalm 18:9; 104:2; 144:5; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; Ezekiel 1:22; Zechariah 12:1.
  13. Isaiah 64:1.
  14. Psalm 102:25.
  15. Hebrews 12:26, Haggai 2:6, Isaiah 13:13.
  16. 2 Peter 3:12.
  17. Revelation 6:14.
  18. Hebrews 1:12.
  19. Isaiah 34:4.
  20. Proverbs 7:9; Jeremiah 6:4.
  21. Leviticus 15.
  22. Job 4:7.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; god
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 541-546 next last
To: Elsie
The story of Genesis wasn't written about navigation for people in the southern hemisphere.

(Admittedly, it's written about salvation for all people in the southern hemisphere, but that's the religious and faith and morals (absolute truth) of the Bible, not the explanation stories and tales and parables parts of the literature.
121 posted on 11/16/2003 1:18:47 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"So science tells us this earth is far older than 12,000 + years old. What science has not and can not say is "WHEN" man in the "FLESH" was created.

True: Which is why I'm impressed with the fact that Genesis DOES claim that Man was created only AFTER domestic animals were created, after mammals (in general) were created, after birds (dinosaurs) and creeping and crawling things were created, which were only created AFTER sea creatures were created, and all coming after plants were created.

Exactly the sequence evolution now claims - 3500 some odd years after God revealed it the first time to the Jews.

122 posted on 11/16/2003 1:24:26 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Genesis 2:16 And the Lord God commanded the man, (note the woman had not been created yet) saying, "Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:

v. 17 BUT of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."

How does one eat from a tree that bears KNOWLEDGE of good and evil?
123 posted on 11/16/2003 1:24:41 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
So... you are claiming that all THESE people are wrong as well: HMmmm....

Upon what evidence?


There are three faiths on this planet with over 1 billion followers - Buddhism, Christianity, Islam. If I were to hazard a guess, I would say that, at least, two out of three are probably mistaken in some way.
124 posted on 11/16/2003 1:26:16 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rebel85
That's why I'm not a Christian.
125 posted on 11/16/2003 1:28:56 PM PST by stands2reason (REWARD! Tagline missing since 10/21. Pithy, clever. Last seen in Chat. Sentimental value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
They are two different stories, each written for a different purpose.

The first tells the story of the world - how God created it for all mankind.

The second tells the story of how the Jews were inspired and were inspired to develope their religion of the one true God.

Like the later parables and poetry that Jesus used to explain things using stories, the two versions don't contradict each other, because they try to explain the secular story of creation, not matters of "Faith" and "Morals" that are absolute Truth.
126 posted on 11/16/2003 1:29:12 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wait. The "creation" of man, which was good on the 6th day is not the same as the creation of "the Adam" on the 8th day. After the 7th day "REST" then there was no "MAN" to till the ground - farmer. Thus there are two days of creation which both are described as "GOOD".

Now if what Peter tells us is applied then the 6th day creation continued for 2000 years before the "creation" of "the Adam".

127 posted on 11/16/2003 1:29:41 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
As I pointed out in #92, it's hard to write about "billions" of years when "zero" and "ten" and "powers of ten" didn't exist.
128 posted on 11/16/2003 1:32:45 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Now just what kind of "TREE" did Adam and EVE use to cover their private parts? "FIG"

Jeremiah talks about good figs and bad figs, Christ himself said to "LEARN the PARABLE OF THE FIG TREE".

and Christ "cursed" the "FIG" tree. So the "FIG" tree tells a story from that Garden of Eden and yet Christ was still talking about it and told us to learn it.
129 posted on 11/16/2003 1:33:50 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: candeee
I don't have a Bible in front of me but I think it begins, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth and then the earth became void." Thus after He first created earth, earth became void. How many years did it take for the earth to become void and what/who caused it to become void? It's late and I'm tired but it seems to me that the 7 days did not start until after the earth became void.

When you read the Bible, you must think Hebrew. This is the way a Hebrew tells you an account. Tell you everything in the first sentence - then go back and fill in the details.
130 posted on 11/16/2003 1:34:25 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
For my edificatioin, what is the Biblical reference for this?

Right there in the same account.

Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name. So Adam gave names to all cattle, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper comparable to him. Genesis 2:19-20

131 posted on 11/16/2003 1:36:51 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Also note when you read after that 7th day, "REST" that there was no man to till the ground.

Please find an single Torah scholar that would attest to such nonsence. There are none.
132 posted on 11/16/2003 1:39:23 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Right. The earth was populated for many years AFTER "man" was created (Adam (as identified in the story of the garden of Eden) not being seen as the "first man" but the first 'Jewish man"?) but true farming did NOT start until only a few years before the Jewish traditions began in Mesopatomia (-1 sp) ...

Which is how, after Cain was expelled from Adam's family for killing Able, he went to live in different city. if "Adam" was the first man (not the first "Man God selected"), then there couldn't have been a different city already developed.

Speaking of which - Can you image the trouble he got into when Cain came back home and admitted to killing 1/4 the human race? 8<)
133 posted on 11/16/2003 1:41:13 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

there is extrememly solid evidence for a very old universe and a very old Earth.

(I am quoting this line from Physicist) "The universe is the way it is, and not how we would wish it to be. "

Take a good look at (supernova) SN1987A and the information it provided.

134 posted on 11/16/2003 1:42:08 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
Why would I need any TORAH scholar to tell me what is WRITTEN.

I can read, and I can look up the meaning of words.

Not my problem if there are no scholars, seems that was foretold.
135 posted on 11/16/2003 1:42:40 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
You are correct. Genesis is ancient literature and the first 11 chapters predate Moses. Never have I seen an evolutionist critic that treats it as anything but modern lit.

Then you are saying Jesus is a liar. Jesus, atributed Torah to Moses. All of it. Jesus said the first man was named Adam.

For all you "old earth" people out there who think you can have your cake and eat it too... the doctrines of sin and salvation hinge upon the Genesis account - the LITERAL account.

Romans 5:12-13: Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men"

There was NO DEATH before sin entered the world - Scripture makes it quite clear that death is the EFFECT of sin - therefore NO SIN - NO DEATH. So all the death that "old earth" theories present is a HUGE problem for believer in Jesus - unless he believes what God said THROUGH MOSES. Scripture makes it abundantly clear tht it is through ONE MAN that sin entered the world. So all the nonsense about each day being a thousands years long is fine and well, but are people saying during those long periods that things are DYING? If so, then they have a more serious THEOLOGY problem - not a SCIENCE problem.

Choose sides, but choose wisely.
136 posted on 11/16/2003 1:48:26 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
there is extrememly

Typing too fast on a small keyboard. Sigh!

Should have read: "There is extremely"

137 posted on 11/16/2003 1:50:04 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
The number "seven" in Babylonian also had an idiomatic connotation of "many," so it could be used both as a number and as a general term (much as the ancient Hebrew "forty" was mistranslated by medieval scholars as a direct number where it could have equally meant many... think the Deluge).

What utter nonsense. Do you even read Hebrew?
138 posted on 11/16/2003 1:51:24 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
I can read, and I can look up the meaning of words.

Do you read Hebrew? If not then you are only "looking up" generic words - and you are not "reading" it.
139 posted on 11/16/2003 1:55:26 PM PST by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Kudzu.
140 posted on 11/16/2003 1:56:40 PM PST by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson