Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We’re Not Getting a Bang for Our Buck
sftt.org ^ | 03 NOV 03 | David Hackworth

Posted on 11/15/2003 12:51:10 PM PST by Voice in your head

Let’s say you own a small trucking company with 20 drivers, but six of your operators are dysfunctional in one way or another. In the real world – to stay in business – you'd have to sack ‘em to survive.

But, apparently, the U.S. Army’s Ready Reserve Force doesn’t need to be concerned about the bottom line as long as we taxpayers have deep pockets. An estimated 60,000 of the 205,000 soldiers on their books can’t deploy to combat zones because of medical problems – and an alarming number of these non-deployables are either wacko, overweight or otherwise physically not up for the fighting game. The Army Reserve also has the largest numbers of females of any of the services – 25 percent – so there are more pregnancies, as well as other family problems. For instance, many serving moms aren’t able to muster sitters when they’re ordered to head toward the world’s hot spots.

Does the Army brass fire these non-producers, as would any prudent civilian boss, or just continue billing us for the approximately one-third of the Army Reserve that’s unfit to fight?

Listen up, and you'll hear the sound of checks being cut.

That’s partly because the Army Reserve is built around numbers. Generals get stars and colonels eagles depending on the head count. “My command has 12,000 troops and is well above its quota,” brags a two-star who doesn't give a rat’s behind whether or not 4,000 of his soldiers can pick up an M-16 rifle and close with the enemy.

“In the Reserve, manpower numbers are everything,” says a sergeant major who recently retired because of the rampant corruption. “It’s also why we have loads of deadbeats, people who may or may not show up for drill – resulting in lots of time spent on phone calls, counseling statements, etc., all of which produce nothing – and people you wish would stay home since they just get in the way. All too often the Reserve becomes ‘welfare in uniform’ for slugs. Although filling our ranks with them drives up a unit’s numbers, the truth is they drive down a unit’s effectiveness, and they drive away the better troops who get fed up with continually having to deal with the dregs.”

The war in Iraq has showcased both the Army’s strengths and its weaknesses – and it’s clear that the Reserve falls into the latter category. Now Congress needs to investigate why this important force flunked the course, using at least the same level of enthusiasm that motivated its examination of Bill Clinton’s maneuvers with Monica.

But more likely, Congress will mimic the three brass monkeys and see, hear and smell no evil. Why? Pork. With an annual budget of almost $6 billion, the Reserves bring heavy dough to every state. Which means that carrying the 60,000 non-deployables costs you and me almost $2 billion a year for dead wood.

In 1989, Simon & Schuster published About Face, a book in which I took the Army to task. Before you could say George Patton, I was sitting in Secretary of the Army Mike Stone’s Pentagon office outlining my bitches. When I told him that the Army Reserve force and National Guard couldn’t hold off a Boy Scout troop on a summer day and needed major surgery, he replied with great prescience, “Hack, it would be easier to clean up the Catholic Church.”

That said, following the tried-and-true example of the Marine Corps – which gives us a great return for our tax dollar with the Marine Reserve – the Army Reserve and National Guard should be merged into one structure. The political generals and colonels should then be replaced by regular soldiers right down to the regimental level. The reservists’ primary tasks should be light infantry, military police, intelligence, medical, civil affairs and transport; they shouldn’t be saddled with complicated missions such as armor, since their limited training period – 38 days a year – makes their ability to be combat-ready impossible.

Only highly motivated, concerned citizens who understand that their national security is at risk and who are sick and tired of being ripped off can make this happen.

And if you don’t believe our Army Reserve system is broken, just ask any reservist below the grade of major for the facts.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hackworth; military; nationalguard; reserve

1 posted on 11/15/2003 12:51:11 PM PST by Voice in your head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
Jumping the shark has been the quite the fashion for Hack lately.
2 posted on 11/15/2003 12:56:56 PM PST by Archangelsk (The equivalent of Pavlov's bell for liberals: Bush, Bush, Bush....:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
In the real world – to stay in business – you'd have to sack ‘em to survive.

An estimated 60,000 of the 205,000 soldiers on their books can’t deploy to combat zones because of medical problems – and an alarming number of these non-deployables are either wacko, overweight or otherwise physically not up for the fighting game.

I sometimes wonder if Hackworth knows what he’s talking about when it comes to things military. Hopefully he knows more about the military and military matters than he knows about the “real world.”

First, there’s a little thing known as the ADA. You go ahead, in the “real world,” and “sack” someone for a medical problem (or mental problem or for being overweight for that matter). You will have a variety of issues to deal with regarding your business and its ability to continue operating after the lawsuit(s).

I’m beginning to think that Hackworth doesn’t have much experience living in the real world.

3 posted on 11/15/2003 1:06:15 PM PST by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
Let’s say you own a small trucking company with 20 drivers, but six of your operators are dysfunctional in one way or another.

Six Democrats is six too many.

4 posted on 11/15/2003 1:14:18 PM PST by rickmichaels (God bless America, land that I love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
Based on my experience, active duty in Vietnam and Europe with the balance in the reserves, I'd strongly agree with the Sergeant Major. I'd have to disagree, however, on full time manning at the higher grades. The real solution is centralized promotion and assignment boards made up exclusively of active duty officers. These boards would have to be real and, unlike some of the boards I've seen in action, not subject to input from the reserves beyond OERs and a summary of IG and Annual Training evaluations. If some integrity were applied to the system, we'd all be a whole lot better off.
5 posted on 11/15/2003 1:39:12 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
Two part solution:

1. Deploy the slackers for a couple months to some hellhole so they leave.

2. Cut FLEOs pay by 25% if they don't sign up for the Reserves. There's TWO infantry divisions worth of JBTs in the FedGov.
6 posted on 11/15/2003 1:51:03 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Who dat?
"You go ahead, in the “real world,” and “sack” someone...You will have a variety of issues to deal with regarding your business..."

Proving only that things are screwed up in the real world, too. One of these days, some lean-and-mean organization is going to take over a lot of our lard-laden dysfuntional social constructions, and it will be very lean times for most of us.

When you compare a typical day for a typical American with what our ancestors had to do just to survive, it makes you realize that 'punctuated equilibrium' is not only an exceptionally efficient means of evolving -- it may be absolutely necessary.

7 posted on 11/15/2003 1:56:51 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I wouldn't be judgmental, if people weren't so STUPID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Who dat?
The government doesn't have to comply with any laws it doesn't like--witness the lawsuits by former employees at area 51 alleging the burning of hazardous waste in trenches which may or may not have resulted in serious health problems for the workers. In essence, the gov't just said "We're top secret, we're exempt", and deftly evaded responsibility.

I don't think it would be too tough to drum out some deadbeats and lardos.
8 posted on 11/15/2003 4:12:38 PM PST by Indrid Cold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indrid Cold
"I don't think it would be too tough to drum out some deadbeats and lardos."

It would not be too difficult at all. All it takes is for leaders at the lower levels to enforce standards. I served a few years in the National Guard and witnessed how simple it is to eliminate the deadbeats. We got a new S-3 who also happened to be our AGR administrative officer and, for a short time, our acting battalion commander. He set clear and simple standards - everybody will come to every MUTA. The dates of each MUTA are published at least 6 months in advance, so no absenses were allowed, without 2 months prior notice and it had better be a damn good excuse, like a wedding of a son or daughter, a planned operation, or something of the sort. The only short term notices allowed were for funerals and medical emergencies involving immediate family (and bring some proof). On top of that, we actually enforced physical fitness and weight control standards. You wouldn't believe the stir he created! Actually enforcing standards!

The Army has some pretty clear standards for physical fitness and weight control, as well as for attendance at training. If a soldier does not show up for work, then he is AWOL - a UCMJ offense. If a soldier is not in accordance with the standards set forth in AR 600-9 The Army Weight Control Program, then he can be seperated from the Army, if he does not come back into compliance.

9 posted on 11/15/2003 9:38:39 PM PST by Voice in your head ("The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." - Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson