Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Voice in your head
In the real world – to stay in business – you'd have to sack ‘em to survive.

An estimated 60,000 of the 205,000 soldiers on their books can’t deploy to combat zones because of medical problems – and an alarming number of these non-deployables are either wacko, overweight or otherwise physically not up for the fighting game.

I sometimes wonder if Hackworth knows what he’s talking about when it comes to things military. Hopefully he knows more about the military and military matters than he knows about the “real world.”

First, there’s a little thing known as the ADA. You go ahead, in the “real world,” and “sack” someone for a medical problem (or mental problem or for being overweight for that matter). You will have a variety of issues to deal with regarding your business and its ability to continue operating after the lawsuit(s).

I’m beginning to think that Hackworth doesn’t have much experience living in the real world.

3 posted on 11/15/2003 1:06:15 PM PST by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Who dat?
"You go ahead, in the “real world,” and “sack” someone...You will have a variety of issues to deal with regarding your business..."

Proving only that things are screwed up in the real world, too. One of these days, some lean-and-mean organization is going to take over a lot of our lard-laden dysfuntional social constructions, and it will be very lean times for most of us.

When you compare a typical day for a typical American with what our ancestors had to do just to survive, it makes you realize that 'punctuated equilibrium' is not only an exceptionally efficient means of evolving -- it may be absolutely necessary.

7 posted on 11/15/2003 1:56:51 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I wouldn't be judgmental, if people weren't so STUPID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Who dat?
The government doesn't have to comply with any laws it doesn't like--witness the lawsuits by former employees at area 51 alleging the burning of hazardous waste in trenches which may or may not have resulted in serious health problems for the workers. In essence, the gov't just said "We're top secret, we're exempt", and deftly evaded responsibility.

I don't think it would be too tough to drum out some deadbeats and lardos.
8 posted on 11/15/2003 4:12:38 PM PST by Indrid Cold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson