1 posted on
11/14/2003 6:29:05 PM PST by
amdgmary
To: amdgmary
I can't quite understand how HER "constitutional rights are being violated". Is there a constitutional right to be put to death by people who find you inconvenient?
2 posted on
11/14/2003 6:32:37 PM PST by
livius
To: amdgmary
"The deprivation of this right is immediate, ongoing and presumptively unconstitutional," Baird said from the bench.Geez... why am I not surprised that another Floridah "judge"??? would declare such nonsense??? No doubt all of them are confirmed followers of Lucifer !!!
.
3 posted on
11/14/2003 6:33:23 PM PST by
GeekDejure
(<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
To: amdgmary
Baird said Terri Schiavo's right not to be kept alive artificially was successfully defended by her husband in state courts, and any delays in removing the feeding tube so she can die are violating her constitutional right to privacy.I was listening to Senator Rick Santorum early this morning. He was making the point that nowhere in the Constitution could he find "right to privacy".
Anyone out there know where this right to privacy that Judge Baird is referencing is found in our Constitution? Or, is Judge Baird just making it up as he goes?
6 posted on
11/14/2003 6:44:23 PM PST by
auboy
(I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
To: amdgmary
This is surreal. A person's right to be killed by her guardian not getting the respect it deserves.
While we're talking about absurdities, isn't it absurd that the contract to offer Federal Reserve Bank services to the government was never put up for open bid? I would gladly print fake money and offer it as collateral for debts, public and private -- billions of it, for a very, very small fee. Just ask me. My laser printer stands at the ready.
To: amdgmary
Felos is a monster from hell and his sidekick MS is even worse.
14 posted on
11/14/2003 11:33:46 PM PST by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: amdgmary
It is a lie...she doesnt have a constitutional "right to die"
This is about her psuedo husband and man living with another woman with whom he has now had two children...he lives in a common law marriage..and as such his wife should be allowed a common law divorce imo
Terri wants to live...if this is not apparent to anyone..that person is either blind or has another agenda
For her to still be alive after all that has been done to deprive her of life sustaining therapy and nutrition is a bold testament to her will to live...
This is not about one womans right to die...its about 'The State' (judges and lawyers and the pro death crowd) claiming the right to kill her...(and by extention their right to kill any of us they choose)
17 posted on
11/15/2003 2:47:00 PM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson