Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: amdgmary
Baird said Terri Schiavo's right not to be kept alive artificially was successfully defended by her husband in state courts, and any delays in removing the feeding tube so she can die are violating her constitutional right to privacy.

I was listening to Senator Rick Santorum early this morning. He was making the point that nowhere in the Constitution could he find "right to privacy".

Anyone out there know where this right to privacy that Judge Baird is referencing is found in our Constitution? Or, is Judge Baird just making it up as he goes?

6 posted on 11/14/2003 6:44:23 PM PST by auboy (I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: auboy
The right to privacy is there... along with the right for a woman to kill her baby.

Can't you read? It is all right there if you put on your glasses with two left lenses.
9 posted on 11/14/2003 8:31:23 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: auboy
The "right to privacy" was first used in the Roe v. Wade decision. The decision said that this right is to be found in the "penumbra" of the constitution--whatever that may mean.

Justice Brennan probably thought this ploy up, although he used his sock puppet on the court to write the actual decision.
10 posted on 11/14/2003 8:45:21 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson