Skip to comments.
Is a soldier's life worth more than $650? (Parents buying body armor for sons in Iraq)
JWR ^
| 10/02/03
| Jonathan Turley
Posted on 11/13/2003 8:41:38 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
For many GIs, Iraq appears to be a strictly BYOB war Bring Your Own Bulletproofs.
Suzanne Werfelman is a mother and a teacher who has been shopping for individual body armor. This is not in response to threats from her elementary-class students in Sciota, Pa.; it's a desperate attempt to protect her son in Iraq.
Like many other U.S. service members in Iraq, her son was given a Vietnam-era flak jacket that cannot stop the type of weapons used today. It appears that parents across the country are now purchasers of body armor because of the failure of the military to supply soldiers with modern vests.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bulletproofvests; flakjackets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: edskid
ping
To: liberty or death
If we anihilate an area each time it happens than the people living there will start killing and stopping the terrorist before he starts.
Nope, wouldn't work. The German's tried to do that in WWII and the got the local populace even more up in arms agains them.
22
posted on
11/13/2003 9:16:29 AM PST
by
Cronos
(W2004)
To: milemark
ping
To: Ronaldus Magnus
I picked up a slightly used size extra-small for a friends daughter in the National Guard last year for $150. The full size level IV plates run about $400 extra. Every U.S. serviceman should be issued a set with their first BDU. How heavy are they?
To: Owl_Eagle; GeneralHavoc
ping
To: Dr. Scarpetta
It's a shame we don't provide these as essential equipment.
This site has the body armor Israelis depend on for sale.
26
posted on
11/13/2003 9:21:01 AM PST
by
Sender
To: Cronos
Exactly. Winning hearts and minds is not just a cliche.
The jihadis are just starting to find that out the hard way.
To: SoCal Pubbie
what part do you not believe?
28
posted on
11/13/2003 9:25:22 AM PST
by
isom35
To: Dr. Scarpetta
How heavy are they? Not much more than the old non-ballistic flak jackets. They are quite a bit stiffer, but not as bulky. The plates do have a considerable heft to them, but less than the old issue chicken plate.
To: Badray; PA Lurker
ping
To: Dr. Scarpetta
Its' disgraceful that our military cannot supply their own with the necessary protection! Where is all the money going?
To: randita; P.O.E.; stevio
ping
To: Dr. Scarpetta
It is a shame but soldier and their families provide a lot of the gear. We have gought extra armour, retractable locking baton, extra mag leg gear, and gloves.
We have one strange looking Christmas wish list.
To: Blessed
It's simple.This decision was one of budgeting during the Clinton Administration. They decide to phase in the purchase over 10 years. They could have done it sooner but their would have been no money for training or updating firepower.This was a rational decision during peace time once they were refused funds by the rats under Clinton.And that's why we also have a shortage of tires, tracks, and facilities to repair the vehicles. It's also why the airframe life of C-17s is being used up faster than new aircraft are being built. Peacetime replacement rates were stretched out even more under the klintons, and there is no wartime "surge" capacity because they cut it out to spend the money elsewhere, outside of DOD.
Bill and Hitlery, the gift that just keeps on giving.
34
posted on
11/13/2003 9:34:14 AM PST
by
300winmag
(Photon Micro-lights: the next best thing to the Phial of Galadriel)
To: Temple Owl; pittsburgh gop guy; fatima; Physicist; Mo1
ping
To: Dr. Scarpetta
If I ever found myself in a situation like this where I was certain that Uncle Sam wasn't providing me with a vital piece of equipment, I'd be AWOL in about five minutes.
36
posted on
11/13/2003 9:36:50 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
To: armymarinemom
It is a shame but soldier and their families provide a lot of the gear. We have gought extra armour, retractable locking baton, extra mag leg gear, and gloves. We have one strange looking Christmas wish list. Did you buy these ceramic inserts for vests?
To: scan59
Protection against shrapnel, not bullets. Yes, and little use against bomb blast and fire. The guerilla weapon of choice seems to be bombs. Competent snipers seem to be rare anymore.
38
posted on
11/13/2003 9:37:34 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: Dr. Scarpetta
This is incredible! We have the best military in the world and our troops who are fighting for us should have the best possible equipment.
To: scan59
Protection against shrapnel, not bullets.Not to mention, they weigh a ton. I never had to wear one except for a few week long exercises, but I can how it could slow you down after awhile. $650 is a lot cheaper than severe injury or death, not even counting the SGLI payout.
40
posted on
11/13/2003 9:43:01 AM PST
by
FlyVet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson