Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prominent Democrat Senators On the Record
Justice For Judges ^ | Unkown

Posted on 11/12/2003 12:12:02 PM PST by LiteKeeper

PROMINENT DEMOCRAT SENATORS ON THE RECORD:

* Tom Harkin (D-IA) "Have the guts to come out and vote up or down….And once and for all, put behind us this filibuster procedure on nominations."

(Cong. Rec., 6/22/95, S8861)

* Joseph Biden (D-DE) "everyone who is nominated is entitled to have a … vote on the floor."

(Cong. Rec., 3/19/97, S2540)

* Richard Durbin (D-IL) "If, after 150 days languishing on the Executive Calendar that name has not been called for a vote, it should be. Vote the person up or down."

(Cong. Rec., 9/28/98, S11021)

* Carl Levin (D-MI) "If a bipartisan majority of the U.S. Senate is prepared to vote to confirm the President's appointment, that vote should occur."

(Cong. Rec., 6/21/95, S8806)

* Edward Kennedy (D-MA) "If our … colleagues don't like them, vote against them. But give them a vote." (Cong. Rec., 2/3/98, S292)

* Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) "Let's bring their nominations up, debate them if necessary, and vote them up or down."

(Cong. Rec., 9/11/97, S9165)

* Tom Daschle (D-SD) "I find it simply baffling that a Senator would vote against even voting on a judicial nomination." (Cong. Rec., 10/5/99, S11919)

* Patrick Leahy (D-VT) "I have stated over and over again … that I would object and fight against any filibuster on a judge, whether it is somebody I opposed or supported." (Cong. Rec, 6/18/98, S6521)

* Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) The filibuster "has unfortunately become a commonplace tactic to thwart the will of the majority." (Cong. Rec., 1/4/95, S36)


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; filibuster; justiceforjudges; marathon; quotes; senators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2003 12:12:02 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Is there any question that DemoRATS are hypocrites?
2 posted on 11/12/2003 12:12:38 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
bttt
3 posted on 11/12/2003 12:13:12 PM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
That's not fair, you used their own words.
4 posted on 11/12/2003 12:14:10 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Does anyone have their statements during the last couple of years?
5 posted on 11/12/2003 12:15:10 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Which time were they lying? We know THAT they were lying, it's only a question of when!
6 posted on 11/12/2003 12:16:37 PM PST by Aeronaut (In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA; The Shrew
Good one!
7 posted on 11/12/2003 12:16:46 PM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) "I have stated over and over again … that I would object and fight against any filibuster on a judge, whether it is somebody I opposed or supported."

I thought that the Dims just invented "filibustering" judges this year????

8 posted on 11/12/2003 12:16:51 PM PST by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Thanks for the great post!
9 posted on 11/12/2003 12:26:21 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Is there any question that DemoRATS are hypocrites?


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hypocrites NO Stupid perhaps.
10 posted on 11/12/2003 12:26:57 PM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (Citizen Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Is there any question that DemoRATS are hypocrites?

Yes . . . there is ONE lone voice . . .

"I think a person can lie and still be honest."
~Dan Rather~
[explaining Bill Clinton]

11 posted on 11/12/2003 12:27:01 PM PST by w_over_w (What is it called when the Saudis can't control their own fanatics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
bump and bookmarked
12 posted on 11/12/2003 12:36:03 PM PST by thiscouldbemoreconfusing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Are you sure you've quoted them correctly?

If you have then what exactly are they trying to prove?

13 posted on 11/12/2003 12:37:10 PM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Someone post this at DUmmyland.
14 posted on 11/12/2003 12:39:29 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
The RATS are masters at situational ethics. Thus, statements made by them in the past have no effect if they conflict with statements they are making now.

There's a line by Paul Neuman in one of his movies, "Hud" I think or maybe "Cool Hand Luke" -- "I believe the law was meant to be interpreted in a lenient manner. Sometimes I lean one way, sometimes I lean the other way."

A perfect summation of the RAT philosophy.

15 posted on 11/12/2003 12:48:45 PM PST by upchuck (Encourage HAMAS to pre-test their explosive devices. A dud always spoils everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Thanks. I'll use this in an editorial. Bet it doesn't see any ink.
16 posted on 11/12/2003 12:50:08 PM PST by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Don't you realize that it's okay to lie to infidels?

-PJ

17 posted on 11/12/2003 12:51:28 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The RATS are masters at situational ethics.

BINGO!!!

Sadly, they can do it because average American - Jane and Joe Public have attention spans of about three seconds. After that, all is forgotten Well, except when the Joie does something wrong to Jane. Then it is remembered for a minimum of 37 years.

18 posted on 11/12/2003 12:56:12 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Good job on the research....

In typical demorat fashion, whether in the Congressional Record or not, they'll spin it as a sign of the times.

19 posted on 11/12/2003 12:57:14 PM PST by b4its2late (Liberals are as confused as a hungry baby in a topless bar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dixielander
Bump!
20 posted on 11/12/2003 1:04:45 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson