Skip to comments.
Sen. Miller seeks to bust filibusters after 30-hour debate
AccessNorthGA ^
| 11/12/03
Posted on 11/12/2003 11:48:38 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: Consort
Yes, mainly because Conservatives don't believe in incrementalism...they want it all...right now...their way or no way.And of course you have some grand scheme that will explain why the Republican party moves left to go conservative I suppose....
61
posted on
11/12/2003 6:41:52 PM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
And of course you have some grand scheme that will explain why the Republican party moves left to go conservative I suppose....Does that statement make sense to you?
62
posted on
11/12/2003 6:48:53 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Consort
Your statement '
Yes, mainly because Conservatives don't believe in incrementalism...they want it all...right now...their way or no way..
I gathered from that that the only way to reach a conservative goal is incrementally instead of all at once. I would like to know how moving left is moving toward a conservative goal of any sort. If I misunderstood you, please clarify
63
posted on
11/12/2003 7:15:20 PM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
My statement has nothing to do with moving right or left. Why did you assume that? It has to do with strategy. And, no, incrementalism is not the only way to reach a goal. Why did you assume that, as well?
64
posted on
11/12/2003 7:28:52 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Consort
>>>What I said applies to countless postings here and you know as well as I do that it is accurate.There are even more "countless postings" on FR, that apply to actual political conservatism. You're confusing traditional conservatism with rightwing extremism.
The question for you is simple. Don't you want to have more conservatives like Scalia's, Thomases and Rehnquist's on the USSC, then moderates like O'Conner and Kennedy?
65
posted on
11/12/2003 8:55:04 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: Reagan Man
correction: Make that "Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist"
66
posted on
11/12/2003 8:58:51 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: expatpat
They may need it in the future. Think of a small Democrap majority in the Senate ramming through a bunch of Commie judges.
That's already happened. The Pubs didn't filibuster. With respect to judicial nominees, they should absolutely change the rule.
67
posted on
11/12/2003 9:06:13 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: reflecting
love that Zell! A real DINO! And a Dino is a good thing as
opposed to a rino, hino. etc.
To: Reagan Man
You're confusing traditional conservatism with rightwing extremism.Nope.
The question for you is simple. Don't you want to have more conservatives...
The answer is simple. Use the best strategies to attain that goal.
69
posted on
11/12/2003 9:38:50 PM PST
by
Consort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson