Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Quit! Overworked Employees Are Fed Up: A Survey Finds 8 Out of 10 Americans Want a New Job
CNN/ Money ^ | 11/11/2003 | Leslie Haggin Geary

Posted on 11/11/2003 10:09:44 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

I quit! Overworked employees are fed up: a survey finds 8 out of 10 Americans want a new job.

New York (CNN/Money) - Ready to quit? You have plenty of company.

Many employees are overworked, stressed out, fed up -- and eager to quit their jobs once the economy picks up. In fact, worker angst is so pronounced it has surprised even the most tuned-in human resource professionals. They say employee anger is now almost palpable.


(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iquit; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2003 10:09:44 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
Ah ha! This is how they can still attack Bush on the economy. It's doing so well because bosses are cruel to their employees! Let's pass a law making them nicer.
2 posted on 11/11/2003 10:31:57 PM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
bump
3 posted on 11/11/2003 11:00:06 PM PST by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
For example, a national clothing chain must sell 3,000 pairs of $35 khakis to cover the price of replacing a salesperson who quits, including recruiting, training and lost productivity.

The tab to replace a typical white-collar middle manager runs about $100,000.

Let's see $35 X 3000 = $105,000 for a retail clerk at a clothing store.

And $100,000 for a middle manager?

Maybe it's just me but I say this whole article is just garbage.

4 posted on 11/11/2003 11:15:46 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeuceTraveler
No-it means you are getting less workers to do more work.
5 posted on 11/11/2003 11:16:08 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
It's not you, it's garbage from an idiot that doesn't have a clue about basic economics.
6 posted on 11/11/2003 11:30:00 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'm a conservative...not necessarily a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
Let's see $35 X 3000 = $105,000 for a retail clerk at a clothing store.

That's gross, not net.

7 posted on 11/11/2003 11:30:49 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Good point. But it was a bad example to use IMHO.
8 posted on 11/11/2003 11:35:25 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
read later bump
9 posted on 11/11/2003 11:36:48 PM PST by nutmeg ("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
"In fact, worker angst is so pronounced it has surprised even the most tuned-in human resource professionals. They say employee anger is now almost palpable."

Where have these dweebs been? From my point of view, it's been this way since the mid '80's. Either you do the work of 3 or you're out the door.

10 posted on 11/11/2003 11:51:44 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeuceTraveler; Luke Skyfreeper
Don't laugh too hard. This is something you will see used by a smart Rat demogogue someday. When it happens, look out. I only hope it ain't Hillary.
11 posted on 11/12/2003 3:13:28 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (The scariest nine words in the English Language: We're from the government. We're here to help you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
"Where have these dweebs been? From my point of view, it's been this way since the mid '80's. Either you do the work of 3 or you're out the door."

......that was my experiance too........in the late 80s my old company went thru "restructuring" and a bunch of jobs were eliminated.....those of us that survived went thru "survivors syndrome".....that is we felt bad for the ones that got the boot but were grateful to have survived......then reality slowly set in; the work still had to get done and there were fewer of us to do it......seeing this, some of the old timers took retirement.....which meant even FEWER folks to get the work out......computers help, but they are not the total answer......there's just no substitute for manpower........I went thru three rounds of layoffs......I survived the first two but they got me on the third.......at the end I was just as glad.......the tension at work made me not want to go in any more.

12 posted on 11/12/2003 7:17:58 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
the tension at work made me not want to go in any more.

I worked in the defense/aerospace industry where layoffs were not occurring (or only very infrequently). However the work load went up with each transfered employee who was not replaced. Finally I hit early retirement age and the stress left as I realized it was time for me to make room for a younger employee who wanted to work 12 hours a day. So now I RV the good old USA with others who have seen the light.

13 posted on 11/12/2003 7:55:26 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
It's typical no math journalism to make things looks bigger than they are. A significant chunk of that $35 goes to the manufacturer and possibly the wholesaler. So it's 3000 X $35 x {markup percentage). The cost of replacing a clerk is probably 20 to 30 grand.
14 posted on 11/12/2003 8:00:04 AM PST by discostu (You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
Let's see $35 X 3000 = $105,000 for a retail clerk at a clothing store.

And you are thinking they got them for free and work at 100 percent profit?

15 posted on 11/12/2003 8:09:37 AM PST by biblewonk (I must answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY
Yes, but how much does it cost to replace a fiction writer for a news magazine? How many rags does said publisher need to sell?
16 posted on 11/12/2003 8:15:24 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
In the past 3 years, management has beaten up us so badly that I have yet to talk to anyone here who DOESN'T want to leave.

Last March upper management finally got the message and put away the hammer.

17 posted on 11/12/2003 2:00:44 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
At the place I consult at there has been one person who has left in the last three years. When things turn around I see most of the younger workers bailing as soon as they can. from my experince a persons biggest raises and advancements come from jumping ship. It shouldn't be that way but it's been almost universally true in my experience.
18 posted on 11/12/2003 2:14:50 PM PST by Rev DMV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
I worked in the defense/aerospace industry where layoffs were not occurring (or only very infrequently).

We must have been working in different parts of the defense/aerospace industry: in 1991, I was one of 10,000 laid off at General Dynamics (I think it's now Lockhead Martin) in Ft. Worth, where they build the F-16.

That was one-third of their workforce at that plant and it was a mix of blue- and white-collar workers.

At the same time, Bell Helicopter-Textron (Arlington, TX) was also laying off a bunch of people.

Oh, and just for good measure, GD was laying off people in Land Systems Division, (where they built tanks), Electric Boat division (nuclear submarines) and whatever the division was called out in CA where they built the cruise missiles.

The "bombs and bullets" part of defense went down the tubes as part of our "peace dividend" and even my friends at E Systems (which are more of the "spy in the sky" types) were being laid off.

19 posted on 11/12/2003 2:50:27 PM PST by Elric@Melnibone (There are very few personal problems that can't be solved by a suitable application of high explosiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Elric@Melnibone
We were in the same company, but I was refering to a later period. (I left in 2002) By that time LMT had the JSF in Dallas Ft Worth and the THAAD missile (my project) in Alabama and Sunnyvale. Plus space launches out of Denver.

This business has always had its ups and downs, and looking back I can see how much it depended on the administration. Lockheed benefitted from Reagan, and the latest Bush. Boeing had its greatest adherents in the Clinton Administration even thugh Clinton was shifting from defense to social programs. (the peace dividend was a boon to democrats).
20 posted on 11/12/2003 3:43:01 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson