Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss Marple
It's more than disgusting. It's probably illegal. If there is no source for the pregnancy/abortion angle, wouldn't it represent slander and libel? If I were Nancy, I'd get legal representation for this. I'm thinking the RNC might even have an interest in this.
35 posted on 11/08/2003 7:45:01 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: johniegrad
I like your thinking. Perhaps CBS could be sued...and as a settlement we could ask that Roger Ailes be placed in charge of the new division.
36 posted on 11/08/2003 7:46:52 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad
Seems to me you can show malice with this whole effort. Viacom ought to be sued out of existence.
39 posted on 11/08/2003 7:50:28 AM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad
I do believe it is fact that she was pregnant before they got married.
71 posted on 11/08/2003 8:52:27 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad
It seems to me that Patti Davis did hint that her Mother might have been expecting her before their marriage, but she didn't mention an abortion senario. In fact, she never had this confirmed by her parents, who insisted she was premature or something if I recall from her book. They made this part up for sure to make them appear as hypocrites I am sure!
160 posted on 11/08/2003 12:55:03 PM PST by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson