Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/07/2003 6:17:35 AM PST by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brian S
Anyone else wondering why this story is getting any traction whereas "The Memo" isn't?

One story is about Saddam Hussein failing at an attempted delay tactic. The other is about potentially treasonous activity.

Which one is more important?

I hate liberals.
2 posted on 11/07/2003 6:21:23 AM PST by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
As I understand it this took place just days after the "Mission Accomplished" banners had been ordered at the Austin TX RNC-run powerhouse, "Banners-R-Us" and only a month after the entire next 20 years had been planned at the Governor's mansion in Texas. Saddam was even willing to limit the number of rapes at his rape centers and included the potential allowance for some French verifications that his non-existant WMD had, indeed, not been left in Iraq. All the more insidious.
3 posted on 11/07/2003 6:22:35 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S; Miss Marple; Howlin; Grampa Dave
I wonder how much the Democrats on the Intel Committee paid this guy Hage to start this 2004 "Tears for Saddam" Tour?

Of all the crap coming from the left to undermine this President, This story takes the cake.

4 posted on 11/07/2003 6:25:50 AM PST by MJY1288 (The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
What a load of crap. How can a reporter believe one word? Are reporters really this stupid, or are they willing and proud participants in this international anti-America pro-Saddam propaganda effort?
9 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:07 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Who on earth has dumbed themselves down enough to believe Saddam had any intention of caving?
13 posted on 11/07/2003 6:39:27 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
As Rumsfeld said yesterday- There was no reason for him to go through back channels.

He had a standing deadline, didn't he, there at the end, of 48 hours? He could have done something then. Too bad so sad.

Next time Bush says "You've got 48 hours" I bet they will think "Hey! I've got 48 hours."

I like when people say what they mean and mean what they say.
16 posted on 11/07/2003 7:05:40 AM PST by eyespysomething (As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another. (Proverbs 27:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
Almost up to the point the bombs began to fall in Bagdad, Saddam could have stopped the war by giving in to the UN (even if he did not mean to follow up on anything)

Saddam (for reasons that I can not understand) thought President Bush was bluffing. He lost that bet.

At this point, I will let history sort it out.

18 posted on 11/07/2003 7:09:51 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian S
These stories sound vaguely familiar /// Oh, yes,

Greetings:

I am a very wealthy banker in Nigeria and I need to wire some 10 gadzillion dollars to your account. In exchange .....

21 posted on 11/07/2003 7:19:09 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson